Paper · 2026 · Crops

Effect of Two Calcium Levels and a Chicken Manure-Based Soil Amendment on Tomato Hybrid Performance

Carlos David Carretillo Moctezuma; Abraham Francisco Aponte Herrera; José Terrones Salgado; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Calcium (Ca) is essential for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit quality and for preventing physiological disorders such as blossom-end rot. However, high total soil Ca does not necessarily translate into plant-available Ca due to factors such as soil pH and limited mobility. This study evaluated soil Ca availability and the effect of a chicken manure-based soil amendment on the growth and yield of four tomato genotypes (Pony Express F1, Palomo F1, Toro F1, and Perseo F1) grown on a loam–clay–sand soil containing 4886 ppm Ca. In the first cycle, conducted in a shade house, two Ca application levels (0% and 25% of the crop’s requirement) were tested. The 0% treatment outperformed the 25% treatment regarding yield-related traits, indicating that native soil Ca met crop demand; application of 25% Ca reduced total fruit weight and fruit number by 19.7% and 5.9%, respectively, while the 0% treatment produced 40.8% more first-quality fruits. Perseo F1 (Perseo) produced the highest yield of first-quality fruits (20.61 t ha−1), exceeding Pony Express F1 (Pony express), Palomo F1 (Palomo), and Toro F1 (Toro) by 10.8%, 6.6%, and 51.4%, respectively. In a second cycle under open-field conditions, incorporation of the chicken manure amendment significantly enhanced growth and yield: treated plants reached a 0.85 m height 58 days after transplanting, and overall yield increased to 70.08 t ha−1 compared with 50.30 t ha−1 in the control (21.9% increase). These results indicate that, while native soil Ca can satisfy crop requirements under the studied conditions, soil amendment under field conditions substantially improves plant performance and commercial yield potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0% Ca treatment outperformed the 25% Ca treatment for tomato yield-related traits, indicating native soil Ca met crop demand.

Treatment
0% treatmente1
Outcome
yield-related traitse1
Direction
outperformede1
Comparator
25% treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 0% treatment outperformed the 25% treatment regarding yield-related traits, indicating that native soil Ca met crop demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 25% Ca reduced tomato total fruit weight by 19.7% relative to the 0% treatment.

Treatment
application of 25% Cae2
Outcome
total fruit weighte2
Direction
reducede2
Value
19.7%e2
Comparator
0% treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 25% Ca reduced total fruit weight and fruit number by 19.7% and 5.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 0% treatment outperformed the 25% treatment regarding yield-related traits, indicating that native soil Ca met crop demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 25% Ca reduced tomato fruit number by 5.9% relative to the 0% treatment.

Treatment
application of 25% Cae2
Outcome
fruit numbere2
Direction
reducede2
Value
5.9%e2
Comparator
0% treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 25% Ca reduced total fruit weight and fruit number by 19.7% and 5.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 0% treatment outperformed the 25% treatment regarding yield-related traits, indicating that native soil Ca met crop demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0% Ca treatment produced 40.8% more first-quality tomato fruits than the 25% treatment.

Treatment
0% treatmente3
Outcome
first-quality fruitse3
Direction
moree3
Value
40.8%e3
Comparator
25% treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“the 0% treatment produced 40.8% more first-quality fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 0% treatment outperformed the 25% treatment regarding yield-related traits, indicating that native soil Ca met crop demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perseo F1 produced the highest yield of first-quality tomato fruits, 20.61 t ha−1.

Material
Perseo F1 (Perseo)e4
Outcome
yield of first-quality fruitse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
20.61 t ha−1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Perseo F1 (Perseo) produced the highest yield of first-quality fruits (20.61 t ha−1), exceeding Pony Express F1 (Pony express), Palomo F1 (Palomo), and Toro F1 (Toro) by 10.8%, 6.6%, and 51.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perseo F1 exceeded Pony Express F1 by 10.8% in yield of first-quality fruits.

Material
Perseo F1 (Perseo)e4
Outcome
yield of first-quality fruitse4
Direction
exceedinge4
Value
10.8%e4
Comparator
Pony Express F1 (Pony express)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Perseo F1 (Perseo) produced the highest yield of first-quality fruits (20.61 t ha−1), exceeding Pony Express F1 (Pony express), Palomo F1 (Palomo), and Toro F1 (Toro) by 10.8%, 6.6%, and 51.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perseo F1 exceeded Palomo F1 by 6.6% in yield of first-quality fruits.

Material
Perseo F1 (Perseo)e4
Outcome
yield of first-quality fruitse4
Direction
exceedinge4
Value
6.6%e4
Comparator
Palomo F1 (Palomo)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Perseo F1 (Perseo) produced the highest yield of first-quality fruits (20.61 t ha−1), exceeding Pony Express F1 (Pony express), Palomo F1 (Palomo), and Toro F1 (Toro) by 10.8%, 6.6%, and 51.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perseo F1 exceeded Toro F1 by 51.4% in yield of first-quality fruits.

Material
Perseo F1 (Perseo)e4
Outcome
yield of first-quality fruitse4
Direction
exceedinge4
Value
51.4%e4
Comparator
Toro F1 (Toro)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Perseo F1 (Perseo) produced the highest yield of first-quality fruits (20.61 t ha−1), exceeding Pony Express F1 (Pony express), Palomo F1 (Palomo), and Toro F1 (Toro) by 10.8%, 6.6%, and 51.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating the chicken manure amendment significantly enhanced tomato growth under open-field conditions.

Treatment
incorporation of the chicken manure amendmente5
Outcome
growthe5
Direction
enhancede5
Setting
open-field conditionse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“In a second cycle under open-field conditions, incorporation of the chicken manure amendment significantly enhanced growth and yield: treated plants reached a 0.85 m height 58 days after transplanting, and overall yield increased to 70.08 t ha−1 compared with 50.30 t ha−1 in the control (21.9% increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure-treated tomato plants reached a 0.85 m height 58 days after transplanting.

Treatment
chicken manure amendmente5
Outcome
heighte5
Value
0.85 me5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“In a second cycle under open-field conditions, incorporation of the chicken manure amendment significantly enhanced growth and yield: treated plants reached a 0.85 m height 58 days after transplanting, and overall yield increased to 70.08 t ha−1 compared with 50.30 t ha−1 in the control (21.9% increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating the chicken manure amendment increased overall tomato yield by 21.9% compared with the control under open-field conditions.

Treatment
incorporation of the chicken manure amendmente5
Outcome
overall yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
21.9%e5
Qualifier
70.08 t ha−1 compared with 50.30 t ha−1e5
Comparator
controle5
Setting
open-field conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Hybrid Performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“In a second cycle under open-field conditions, incorporation of the chicken manure amendment significantly enhanced growth and yield: treated plants reached a 0.85 m height 58 days after transplanting, and overall yield increased to 70.08 t ha−1 compared with 50.30 t ha−1 in the control (21.9% increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1466 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

79 papers: 67 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

130 papers: 117 positive, 13 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.