Paper · 2026 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Harnessing indigenous mycorrhizal symbiosis to boost sorghum productivity and phosphorus-use efficiency on contrasting Sudanese vertisols

Nouralhuda A. J. Tia; Khalid Abdalla Osman; Mahbubjon Rahmatov; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sorghum productivity on vertisols is constrained by phosphate fixation, salinity, and nutrient limitations, undermining food security in semi-arid regions. We evaluated the impact of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on growth, yield, and phosphorus (P) dynamics of four Sudanese sorghum cultivars across two vertisol sites: Abassyia (salinity – sodicity stress) and Medani (P deficiency). Field inoculation with indigenous AMF consortia (Rhizophagus, Glomus, Claroideoglomus, Funneliformis, Entrophospora, Scutellospora, and Acaulospora) improved sorghum performance, increasing biomass, panicle length, grain yield, root colonization, spore density, and phosphorus acquisition efficiency (PAE). Inoculated plants achieved colonization levels of 52–81% and spore densities up to 4894 spores per 100 g soil, with PAE increasing to 132 mg P plant− 1. Shoot P concentration and plant height were unaffected; no conclusion can be drawn regarding P allocation. Cultivar- and site-specific responses identified Tabat as the most productive cultivar (36.6 g grain yield plant− 1), while Tetron showed superior PAE. Multivariate analyses confirmed strong associations between AMF colonization, biomass, and yield, with clustering of inoculated and uninoculated plants. These findings provide robust field evidence that leveraging indigenous AMF biodiversity enhances P-use efficiency and sorghum productivity on vertisols, supporting sustainable biofertilization in low-input systems in sub-Saharan Africa under climate-stressed environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased sorghum biomass and panicle length.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
inoculation with indigenous AMF consortiae0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
biomass, panicle lengthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field inoculation with indigenous AMF consortia (Rhizophagus, Glomus, Claroideoglomus, Funneliformis, Entrophospora, Scutellospora, and Acaulospora) improved sorghum performance, increasing biomass, panicle length, grain yield, root colonization, spore density, and phosphorus acquisition efficiency (PAE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased grain yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
inoculation with indigenous AMF consortiae0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field inoculation with indigenous AMF consortia (Rhizophagus, Glomus, Claroideoglomus, Funneliformis, Entrophospora, Scutellospora, and Acaulospora) improved sorghum performance, increasing biomass, panicle length, grain yield, root colonization, spore density, and phosphorus acquisition efficiency (PAE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased root colonization and spore density.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
inoculation with indigenous AMF consortiae0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonization, spore densitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field inoculation with indigenous AMF consortia (Rhizophagus, Glomus, Claroideoglomus, Funneliformis, Entrophospora, Scutellospora, and Acaulospora) improved sorghum performance, increasing biomass, panicle length, grain yield, root colonization, spore density, and phosphorus acquisition efficiency (PAE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased phosphorus acquisition efficiency.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
inoculation with indigenous AMF consortiae0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus acquisition efficiency (PAE)e0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field inoculation with indigenous AMF consortia (Rhizophagus, Glomus, Claroideoglomus, Funneliformis, Entrophospora, Scutellospora, and Acaulospora) improved sorghum performance, increasing biomass, panicle length, grain yield, root colonization, spore density, and phosphorus acquisition efficiency (PAE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–720 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated sorghum achieved 52–81% AMF colonization.

Outcome
colonization levelse0
Value
52–81%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants achieved colonization levels of 52–81% and spore densities up to 4894 spores per 100 g soil, with PAE increasing to 132 mg P plant− 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated soils reached 4894 AMF spores per 100 g soil.

Outcome
spore densitiese0
Value
4894 spores per 100 g soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants achieved colonization levels of 52–81% and spore densities up to 4894 spores per 100 g soil, with PAE increasing to 132 mg P plant− 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAE increased to 132 mg P plant− 1 in inoculated plants.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
PAEe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
132 mg P plant− 1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants achieved colonization levels of 52–81% and spore densities up to 4894 spores per 100 g soil, with PAE increasing to 132 mg P plant− 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation left shoot P concentration and plant height unaffected.

Outcome
Shoot P concentration and plant heighte0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot P concentration and plant height were unaffected; no conclusion can be drawn regarding P allocation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tabat was the most productive cultivar at 36.6 g grain yield per plant.

Material
Tabate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
most productivee0
Value
36.6 g grain yield plant− 1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar- and site-specific responses identified Tabat as the most productive cultivar (36.6 g grain yield plant− 1), while Tetron showed superior PAE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetron showed superior phosphorus acquisition efficiency.

Material
Tetrone0
Outcome
PAEe0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar- and site-specific responses identified Tabat as the most productive cultivar (36.6 g grain yield plant− 1), while Tetron showed superior PAE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization, biomass and yield were strongly associated.

Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
biomass, and yielde0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Multivariate analyses confirmed strong associations between AMF colonization, biomass, and yield, with clustering of inoculated and uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1285 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate analysis clustered inoculated and uninoculated plants.

Outcome
clustering of inoculated and uninoculated plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Multivariate analyses confirmed strong associations between AMF colonization, biomass, and yield, with clustering of inoculated and uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1285 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

28 papers: 13 positive, 15 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

inoculation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 68 positive, 8 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · SorghumResults agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.