Paper · 2017 · FiVeR (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia)

Synergistic effects of salt and drought stress in wheat responses studied by high throughput phenotyping

Paul, Kenny; Pauk, Janos; Kondić-Špika, Ankica; et al.

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Screening of crops for tolerance can strengthen breeding programs by identifying genotypes with increased tolerance and yield potential. The main objective of the present study was to analyze salt tolerance of 14 wheat genotypes originating from different geographical locations (Austria, Azerbaijan and Serbia) under well-watered and water limited conditions by using high-throughput shoot and root phenotyping platforms. Comparative investigations of various morphological, physiological, biochemical and enzymatic responses concerned with salt and drought tolerance were performed at different developmental stages. Our results show that the adverse effects of salt stress are enhanced under water limitation. Water use efficiency remains unaffected by salt stress in well performing wheat lines, e.g. Capo, but drops significantly in salt sensitive lines, e.g. Azamatili 95. Analysis of gas exchange parameters during biomass accumulation and grain filling period show that biomass accumulation and grain production is roughly correlated with photosynthetic efficiency. Proline is an important osmoprotectant whose amount was significantly increased under salt plus drought stress, and also to a smaller extent under drought stress alone, while the applied salt stress alone had negligible effect on the proline content. It is concluded that the co-occurrence of saline and water limited conditions induce large extent of biomass and grain yield loss in wheat, which can be partly reversed by providing well-watered conditions if it is practically feasible. We could also identify wheat lines which show higher tolerance to combined effects of salt and drought, which demonstrates the potential of high throughput plant phenotyping in breeding for drought and salinity stress tolerance in crop plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation enhanced adverse effects of salt stress.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
adverse effects of salt stresse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
water limitatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the adverse effects of salt stress are enhanced under water limitation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress did not affect water use efficiency in well performing lines such as Capo.

Material
Capoe0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use efficiency remains unaffected by salt stress in well performing wheat lines, e.g. Capo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly lowered water use efficiency in salt sensitive lines such as Azamatili 95.

Material
Azamatili 95e0
Outcome
water use efficiencyt0
Direction
dropse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but drops significantly in salt sensitive lines, e.g. Azamatili 95.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water use efficiency remains unaffected by salt stress in well performing wheat lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–798 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass accumulation and grain production were roughly correlated with photosynthetic efficiency.

Outcome
biomass accumulation and grain productione0
Qualifier
roughlye0
Comparator
photosynthetic efficiencye0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“biomass accumulation and grain production is roughly correlated with photosynthetic efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt plus drought stress significantly increased proline content.

Treatment
salt plus drought stresse0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Proline is an important osmoprotectant whose amount was significantly increased under salt plus drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought alone increased proline content to a smaller extent.

Treatment
drought stress alonee0
Outcome
proline contentt0
Direction
smaller extente0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and also to a smaller extent under drought stress alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“the proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress alone had negligible effect on proline content.

Treatment
salt stress alonee0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
negligible effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the applied salt stress alone had negligible effect on the proline content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined salinity and water limitation caused large biomass loss.

Treatment
saline and water limited conditionse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-occurrence of saline and water limited conditions induce large extent of biomass and grain yield loss in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined salinity and water limitation caused large grain yield loss.

Treatment
saline and water limited conditionse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-occurrence of saline and water limited conditions induce large extent of biomass and grain yield loss in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well watered conditions could partly reverse combined stress losses.

Treatment
well-watered conditionse0
Outcome
partly reversede0
Direction
reversede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“which can be partly reversed by providing well-watered conditions if it is practically feasible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study identified wheat lines with higher tolerance to combined salt and drought.

Outcome
higher tolerance to combined effects of salt and droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We could also identify wheat lines which show higher tolerance to combined effects of salt and drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1664 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 9 positive, 49 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 48 positive, 27 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.