Paper · 2026 · npj Biofilms and Microbiomes

Bacterial inoculation drives microbiome-mediated resistance to a soil-borne pathogen in wheat

Caroline Sayuri Nishisaka; Hélio Danilo Quevedo; Thierry Alexandre Pellegrinetti; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil microbiomes are fundamental to plant health, mediating nutrient cycling, stress tolerance, and pathogen defense. However, soil-borne pathogens such as Bipolaris sorokiniana severely constrain wheat productivity. Despite growing interest, the mechanisms by which beneficial bacterial inoculation reshapes rhizosphere microbial communities to enhance disease resistance remain poorly understood. Here, we isolated three bacterial strains, Streptomyces virginiae CMAA1738, Paenibacillus ottowii CMAA1739, and Pseudomonas inefficax CMAA1741, with antagonistic activity against B. sorokiniana, and evaluated their effects on wheat under controlled conditions. Through plant bioassays, bacterial inoculation reduced disease severity by ~60% and promoted root growth. Metataxonomic and metagenomic analyses revealed shifts in the structure and functional potential of the rhizosphere microbiome. Structural equation modeling indicated that inoculation was the primary driver of microbiome restructuring and disease suppression. Notably, inoculation restored the diversity of plant growth-promoting genes and biosynthetic gene clusters reduced by pathogen infection, enriching functions associated with stress tolerance, nutrient metabolism, and secondary metabolite production. In addition, Random Forest analysis revealed that variation in disease severity under pathogen pressure was associated with differences in bacterial community composition. Together, these findings demonstrate that bacterial inoculation can restructure the rhizosphere microbiome and restore key functional traits linked to plant resilience.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three bacterial strains had antagonistic activity against B. sorokiniana.

Interactor
B. sorokinianaBipolaris sorokinianae0pathogen
Second interactor
Streptomyces virginiae CMAA1738Streptomyces virginiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activity against B. sorokinianae0
Qualifier
Paenibacillus ottowii CMAA1739, and Pseudomonas inefficax CMAA1741e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Streptomyces virginiae CMAA1738, Paenibacillus ottowii CMAA1739, and Pseudomonas inefficax CMAA1741, with antagonistic activity against B. sorokiniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation reduced wheat disease severity by about 60%.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Interactor
Bipolaris sorokinianaBipolaris sorokinianae1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
~60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation reduced disease severity by ~60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bipolaris sorokiniana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation promoted wheat root growth.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation reduced disease severity by ~60% and promoted root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation shifted rhizosphere microbiome structure and functional potential.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
structure and functional potential of the rhizosphere microbiomee1
Direction
shiftse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Through plant bioassays, bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“revealed shifts in the structure and functional potential of the rhizosphere microbiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Structural equation modeling identified inoculation as the primary driver of microbiome restructuring and disease suppression.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
microbiome restructuring and disease suppressione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation was the primary driver of microbiome restructuring and disease suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation restored diversity of plant growth-promoting genes and biosynthetic gene clusters reduced by pathogen infection.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
diversity of plant growth-promoting genes and biosynthetic gene clusterse0
Direction
restorede0
Qualifier
reduced by pathogen infectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation restored the diversity of plant growth-promoting genes and biosynthetic gene clusters reduced by pathogen infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enriched functions associated with stress tolerance, nutrient metabolism, and secondary metabolite production.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
functions associated with stress tolerance, nutrient metabolism, and secondary metabolite productione0
Direction
enrichinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation restored the diversity of plant growth-promoting genes and biosynthetic gene clusters reduced by pathogen infection, enriching functions associated with stress tolerance, nutrient metabolism, and secondary metabolite production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under pathogen pressure, disease severity varied with bacterial community composition.

Interactor
bacterial communitye0symbiont
Outcome
variation in disease severitye0
Qualifier
under pathogen pressuree0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in disease severity under pathogen pressure was associated with differences in bacterial community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑

inoculation · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · Bipolaris sorokiniana · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.