drought · Yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)
12 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 4
4 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effects of drought stress and super absorbent polymer on susceptibility of pepper to damage caused by Aphis gossypii Glover (Hem.: Aphididae) (2015)
increaseLow 15% drought increased pepper yield.
RESPONSE OF RED CHILLI VARIETIES UNDER DROUGHT STRESS (2017)decreaseGrowth and yield decreased most under high water stress (50% FC) compared with optimum water supply (100% FC).
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of water stress on the growth, physiological response and antioxidative gene expression of grafted sweet pepper plants (2019)
decreaseGrafted sweet pepper had the smallest yield reduction caused by water deficit.
Impact of deficit irrigation on sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum var. Simbard) performance: Assessing growth, yield, and water use efficiency under a four-day interval irrigation (2025)no changeThe authors report no significant yield reduction under modest water stress.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effects of drought stress and super absorbent polymer on susceptibility of pepper to damage caused by Aphis gossypii Glover (Hem.: Aphididae) (2015)
increaseLow 15% drought increased pepper yield.
Effect of water stress on the growth, physiological response and antioxidative gene expression of grafted sweet pepper plants (2019)decreaseGrafted sweet pepper had the smallest yield reduction caused by water deficit.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - RESPONSE OF RED CHILLI VARIETIES UNDER DROUGHT STRESS (2017)
decreaseGrowth and yield decreased most under high water stress (50% FC) compared with optimum water supply (100% FC).
Impact of deficit irrigation on sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum var. Simbard) performance: Assessing growth, yield, and water use efficiency under a four-day interval irrigation (2025)no changeThe authors report no significant yield reduction under modest water stress.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 3
Response of Mycorrhizal Bell Peppers to Inoculation Timing, Phosphorus, and Water Stress · 1989
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 8
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Yield Traits and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Bell Pepper Grown in Plastic-Greenhouse · 2009
- negative
RESPONSE OF RED CHILLI VARIETIES UNDER DROUGHT STRESS · 2017
- negative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.