View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The mitochondrial pool decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria.
Treatmentglucose-starved e1 Outcomelow- and intermediate-density mitochondria e0 Comparatorhigher-density mitochondria e0 Verbatim
e0 “this decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria, but not higher- density mitochondria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1460 e1 “preparations from glucose-starved maize root tips ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1180 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher in terspecies in teraction in tensity can decrease evaporation by in creasing root length density of the in tercropped crops
Qualifierby increasing the root length density of intercropping crops e7 Verbatim
e0 “wheat ( Triticum aestivum )–maize ( Zea mays ) in tercropping system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–345 e7 “In creasing in terspecies in teraction in tensity can decrease evaporation by in creasing the root length density of in tercropping crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1614 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Supraoptimal density decrease d root numbers at upper levels.
Treatmentsupraoptimal plant density e0 Qualifierat upper internode and node levels e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A supraoptimal plant density caused an in crease in lengths and a decrease in root numbers at upper in ternode and node levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–714 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
LR density began to decrease when shoot N content exceeded about 1.5 and nitrate content exceeded 0.16 mol/kg.
Directionbegan to decrease e7 QualifierNO(-)(3) exceed 0.16 mol/kg e7 Verbatim
e7 “when the shoot N content exceed about 1.5 and NO(-)(3) exceed 0.16 mol/kg, LR densities began to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1431 t0 “lateral root growth in maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Density above 60,000 plants per hectare decrease d grain starch content.
Treatmentincreasing plant density above 60,000 plants /ha e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in creasing plant density above 60,000 plants /ha led to decrease in starch content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–709 t0 “Grain Quality of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under full irrigation, B1 significantly decrease d root length density in year 2.
Outcomeroot length density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “under full irrigation was less clear, with significant decrease in root length density for B1 and B2 in year 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1807 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under full irrigation, B2 significantly decrease d root length density in year 2.
Outcomeroot length density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “under full irrigation was less clear, with significant decrease in root length density for B1 and B2 in year 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1807 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A drop in photon flux density produces a lag in maize photosynthetic carbon assimilation.
Treatmentdecrease in PFD e0 Outcomelag in photosynthetic carbon assimilation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The lag in photosynthetic carbon assimilation in maize that follows a decrease in PFD has been analysed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–963 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessively high or low density decrease d leaf SOD and CAT activities.
Treatmenttoo high or too low density e0 OutcomeSOD (superoxide dismutase) and CAT (catalase) activities e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “too high or too low density will accelerate the aging of maize leaves, which is manifested by the in crease in MDA (malondialdehyde) content and the decrease in SOD (superoxide dismutase) and CAT (catalase) activities. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1517 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher amitrole concentrations rapidly reduced starch in clusion volume density in BSC chloroplasts.
Organ / stageBSC chloroplasts e1 Treatmenthigher concentrations of AM e0 Outcomevolume density of starch inclusions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “rapid decrease in the volume density of starch in clusions was found in plants treated with higher concentrations of AM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1202 e1 “As regards BSC chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1082 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.