Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude mixtures offer little hay yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
little yield advantagee0
Qualifier
when harvested as haye0
Comparator
alfalfa monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1444

Title

Yield Dynamics of Canopy Components in Alfalfa‐Grass Mixtures

G. D. Mooso; W. F. Wedin Agronomy Journal 1990. doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200040010x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing kasugamycin with other fungicides gave little advantage in bacterial spot control.

Treatment
mixing kasugamycin with other fungicidese0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
Little advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Little advantage in disease control was observed by mixing kasugamycin with other fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–459
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100

Title

Comparison of Kasugamycin to Traditional Bactericides for the Management of Bacterial Spot on Tomato

Gary E. Vallad; Kenneth L. Pernezny; Botond Balogh; et al. HortScience 2010. doi:10.21273/hortsci.45.12.1834

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding orange oil or canola oil to vinegar sprays gave little or no advantage.

Treatment
adding either orange oil or canola oil to vinegar spray solutionse1
Outcome
advantagee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“little or no advantage to adding either orange oil or canola oil to vinegar spray solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2622–2713

Title

Impact of Acetic Acid Concentration, Application Volume, and Adjuvants on Weed Control Efficacy

Charles L. Webber III; Paul M. White Jr; James W. Shrefler; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2018. doi:10.5539/jas.v10n8p1

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover individuals showed little home-neighborhood advantage.

Taxon
TrifoliumTrifoliume0
Outcome
grow best in their "home" neighborhoodse0

Verbatim

e0

“There was little indication that individuals of Trifolium grow best in their "home" neighborhoods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–883

Title

Conditioning effects by neighbors on the growth and form of Trifolium repens

Roy Turkington; Elena Klein; Jack Maze Canadian Journal of Botany 1994. doi:10.1139/b94-099

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plasmid conferred little or no selective advantage on calystegine-negative plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
cac catabolic plasmide0
Interactor
Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41t0symbiont
Outcome
selective advantage in the rhizospheree0
Direction
little or noe0
Comparator
calystegine‐negative plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, the cac catabolic plasmid provided little or no selective advantage in the rhizosphere of calystegine‐negative plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1260
t0

“Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–155

Title

Contribution of calystegine catabolic plasmid to competitive colonization of the rhizosphere of calystegine‐producing plants by Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41

D. Guntli; M. Heeb; Y. Moënne‐Loccoz; et al. Molecular Ecology 1999. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00640.x

Other claims from this paper (3)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found little advantage to sowing pea above 100 plants per square metre.

Treatment
seeding pea above the recommended rate of 100 plants m −2e0
Interactor
volunteer barleye0weed
Outcome
little advantagee0

Verbatim

e0

“there was little advantage, in terms of increasing pea yield or reducing volunteer barley interference, to seeding pea above the recommended rate of 100 plants m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1031

Title

Effect of volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) interference on field pea (Pisum sativumL.) yield and profitability

John T. O'Donovan; Robert E. Blackshaw Weed Science 1997. doi:10.1017/s0043174500092791

Other claims from this paper (6)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that solarization offers little to no advantage over hand-hoeing or herbicides in short-season cool climates.

Taxon
weedse0
Outcome
little to no advantage over hand-hoeing or herbicide control of weedse0
Qualifier
no subsequent differences in crop growth can be expectede0

Verbatim

e0

“solarization in short-season, cool climates will result in little to no advantage over hand-hoeing or herbicide control of weeds, and no subsequent differences in crop growth can be expected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1663

Title

Solarization for Weed Control in a Short-season Climate

Jo Ann Robbins; Carol Blackburn HortScience 1997. doi:10.21273/hortsci.32.3.429a

Other claims from this paper (12)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude Lr34 provides little or no competitive advantage in the current high-input New Zealand trial system with full fungicide control.

Gene
Lr34e0
Outcome
little or no competitive advantagee0
Setting
New Zealande0

Verbatim

e0

“The high‐yield, high‐input farming environment and the use of full fungicide control in New Zealand's current wheat cultivar trialing system means that genetic sources of rust resistance such as Lr34 provide little or no competitive advantage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1581

Title

The Future of Lr34 in Modern, High‐Input Wheat Breeding Programs

Paul A. Johnston; Catherine Munro; Ruth C. Butler; et al. Crop Science 2017. doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.03.0158

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon dispersal offered little overall survival advantage.

Outcome
seed survivale0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
under crownse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“overall they did not confer a great advantage to seed survival since significant numbers of seeds/seedlings also persisted under fruiting crowns (27% under crowns compared with 39% locally dispersed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1701

Title

Early fate of Myristica hypargyraea seeds dispersed by Ducula pacifica in Tonga, Western Polynesia

HAYLEY J. MEEHAN; KIM R. MCCONKEY; DONALD R. DRAKE Austral Ecology 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01479.x

Other claims from this paper (11)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cropping with several cereal species offers little advantage in terms of yield loss abatement due to stemborers and land use efficiency.

Taxon
cereal speciese1
Outcome
little advantages in terms of yield loss abatement due to stemborers and land use efficiencye1

Verbatim

e1

“mixed cropping with several cereal species has little advantages in terms of yield loss abatement due to stemborers and land use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–912

Title

The role of intercropping different cereal species in controlling lepidopteran stemborers on maize in Kenya

J. M. Songa; N. Jiang; F. Schulthess; et al. Journal of Applied Entomology 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01116.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.