View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf and root dry weight did not decrease significantly.
Outcomeleaf and root dry weight e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “while leaf and root dry weight did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–288 t0 “carnation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
OutcomeAverage seedling dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions led to a decrease in honeysuckle fruit weight .
TreatmentDry conditions e1 Outcomethe weight of the fruit e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HONEYSUCKLE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 e1 “Dry conditions had a negative impact on productivity, leading to shedding of the ovary, a decrease in the weight of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf and root dry weight did not decrease significantly.
Outcomeleaf and root dry weight e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “while leaf and root dry weight did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–288 t0 “carnation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
OutcomeAverage seedling dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions led to a decrease in honeysuckle fruit weight .
TreatmentDry conditions e1 Outcomethe weight of the fruit e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HONEYSUCKLE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 e1 “Dry conditions had a negative impact on productivity, leading to shedding of the ovary, a decrease in the weight of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode inoculation before fungus caused 33.08% root- dry - weight decrease .
Treatmentnematode was inoculated prior to fungus e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “root dry weight (33.08) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–301 e1 “when nematode was inoculated prior to fungus. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–511 e2 “per cent decrease of plant growth parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode inoculation before fungus caused 51.5% shoot- dry - weight decrease .
Treatmentnematode was inoculated prior to fungus e1 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “shoot length (41.87), shoot dry weight (51.5) and root dry weight (33.08) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–301 e1 “when nematode was inoculated prior to fungus. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–511 e2 “per cent decrease of plant growth parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode exposure did not significantly decrease root and shoot dry weight in subterranean clover cv Denmark.
Taxonwhite and annual clovers t0 Outcomeplant root and shoot dry weight e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in plant root and shoot dry weight when exposed to nematodes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1102 t0 “white and annual clovers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions led to a decrease in honeysuckle fruit weight .
TreatmentDry conditions e1 Outcomethe weight of the fruit e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HONEYSUCKLE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 e1 “Dry conditions had a negative impact on productivity, leading to shedding of the ovary, a decrease in the weight of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shade above 65% decrease d total dry weight .
Treatmentshading intensity more than 65% e0 Outcometotal dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “shading intensity more than 65% in fact, evidently decrease the dry weight crown and total dry weight of mirabow seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1502 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fine root dry weight showed the greatest decrease under drought in the CG5087 tree.
OutcomeFine root (<2 mm diameter) dry weight e1 Directiongreatest decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “we assessed the drought tolerance of 1-year-old apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees exposed to extreme water stress, focusing on growth and physiological responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–179 e1 “Fine root (<2 mm diameter) dry weight showed the greatest decrease in the CG5087 tree ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1267 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot dry weight gradually decrease d from late August.
Directiongradual decrease e0 QualifierFrom the second part of August e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “From the second part of August a gradual decrease in dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1301 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
BA decrease d old phylloclade dry weight by about 4% to 30%.
Outcometotal dry weight of old phylloclades e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “accompanied by a ≈4% to 30% decrease in total dry weight of old phylloclades ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1275 t0 “Easter Cactus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–67 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Top dry weight growth rate (CGR) of maize showed a rapid decrease during the ear-filling period.
OutcomeTop dry weight growth rate (CGR) e1 Directionrapid decrease e1 Qualifierduring the ear-filling period e1 Verbatim
e1 “Top dry weight growth rate (CGR) changed like a shape of unimodal curve with a peak value occurring at about silking in each year, and showed a rapid decrease during the ear-filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1510 t0 “Productivity of Maize for Whole-Plant Silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–70 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High runs of homozygosity were associated with decrease d dry weight .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The ROHs were associated with total weight and dry weight , and high ROHs resulted in a decrease in the two traits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1477 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High runs of homozygosity were associated with decrease d total weight .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The ROHs were associated with total weight and dry weight , and high ROHs resulted in a decrease in the two traits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1477 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Double mutant seeds had 35.2% less total RFO content, falling from 64.7 to 41.95 mg/g dry weight .
Materialdouble mutant lines e0 Treatmentdouble mutant lines e0 Outcometotal RFO content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The seed carbohydrate analysis of double mutant lines showed a reduction in the total RFO content of soybean seed from 64.7 mg/g dry weight to 41.95 mg/g dry weight , a 35.2% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–986 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The regression model predicted apple shoot dry weight from fertility and ground cover dry weight .
Interactorground cover species e0 weed OutcomeApple shoot dry weight e0 Comparatorfertility levels e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Apple shoot dry weight over all fertility levels, ground cover species, and densities was predicted by a regression model based on increase with fertility and decrease with ground cover dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–766 t0 “Apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.