View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density decrease Tiller numbers in hill in rice.
Treatmentplanting density e0 OutcomeTiller numbers in hill e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Tiller numbers in hill was decrease with in creasing of planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1092 t0 “rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–132 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
Outcomenutrient density unit (NDU) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Amylopectin content continued to decrease with in creasing machine transplanting density .
Treatmentincrease in machine transplanting density e4 Outcomeamylopectin content e6 Directioncontinued to decrease e6 Verbatim
e1 “good taste rice cultivars (GTRC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–105 e4 “with the in crease in machine transplanting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1019 e6 “while the amylopectin content continued to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1072 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain density tended to decrease across years.
Verbatim
e0 “The grain density was relative high in recent 4 years and 80 percent of all varieties came up to the second national standard,while there was a decrease tendency among years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–573 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight of maize.
Treatmentplanting density e1 Outcome100-grain weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE CROP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e1 “The in crement of planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight and in crement of the cob percentage in relation to the total ear weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–885 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher in terspecies in teraction in tensity can decrease evaporation by in creasing root length density of the in tercropped crops
Qualifierby increasing the root length density of intercropping crops e7 Verbatim
e0 “wheat ( Triticum aestivum )–maize ( Zea mays ) in tercropping system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–345 e7 “In creasing in terspecies in teraction in tensity can decrease evaporation by in creasing the root length density of in tercropping crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1614 Other claims from this paper (8)
not stated 97 Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree density within fields tended to decrease crop yield.
Settinginside the fields e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “tree canopy cover and tree density in side the fields tended to decrease crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–736 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High density was associated with a 20% decrease in red to near in frared ratio.
Outcomered/near‐infrared (NIR) ratio e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the 2× treatment was attributed to a population‐ density in duced 20% decrease in the red/near‐ in frared (NIR) ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1187 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
Outcomesoil inoculum density e0 Directionnot a significant decrease e0 Comparator1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced.
Outcomewet pack density e0 Qualifierin all of the pack-density experiments e0 Verbatim
e0 “The wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced in all of the pack- density experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–446 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The in crease in bald tip exceeded the decrease in ear length and width at higher density .
TreatmentIncreased planting density e1 Qualifierlarger than the decrease of ear length and width e0 Verbatim
e0 “the in crease of bald tip was larger than the decrease of ear length and width. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1101 e1 “In creased planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–939 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected ear length, diameter and bald tip degree. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected row number per ear, grain number per row and ear grain weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected cob and ear pedicle dry weight. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear length, bald tip degree and grain number per row. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear grain weight, seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Observation Density response variation for ear length, grain number per row and ear grain weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Observation Density response variation for seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Association Increasing density decreased ear grain number mainly through fewer grains per row. Association For a given hybrid, grain to ear percentage was relatively stable across densities. Association observed original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
In secticide use may in crease or decrease depending on field pest density .
Directionincrease or decrease e0 Qualifierpest densities on individual fields e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Depending on pest densities on in dividual fields, in secticide use may in crease or decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–657 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More recently released cultivars had a progressively smaller ozone related decrease in bulk density .
Outcomerate of decrease in bulk density e0 QualifierAs the release age approaches e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “As the release age approaches, the rate of decrease in bulk density diminishes gradually ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1637 t0 “survey of Chinese wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–122 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield tended to decrease above the stated density thresholds.
Treatmentwheat planting density exceeded 450 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 and 525 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “when wheat planting density exceeded 450 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 and 525 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 , wheat yield tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–566 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
Treatmenta third year without wheat e0 Outcomeadditional decrease e0 Directionno additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease .
TreatmentLow plant density e3 Qualifiermay slightly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 e3 “Low plant density helps improve in dividual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing and in creasing density changed the yield of Hefeng 50 in an in crease-then- decrease trend.
Treatmentsowing date delayed and density increased e1 Directionincrease-and-then-decrease trend e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “New soybean variety Hefeng 50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “with the sowing date delayed and density in creased,the yield of Hefeng 50 showed in crease-and-then- decrease trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–426 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend maintaining soybean plant density as recommended to avoid a decrease in grain yield.
OutcomePlant density should be maintained as recommended e6 Verbatim
e0 “An important limitation to in creased soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 e6 “Plant density should be maintained as recommended to avoid a decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1539 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density in creased.
InteractorGoosegrass t1 weed OutcomeSeed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the in crease in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
High plant density and restricted irrigation decrease nitrogen use efficiency.
TreatmentHigh Plant density and restricted irrigation e0 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–13 e0 “High Plant density and restricted irrigation in crease Leaf/Boll ratio (sink limitation), thereby decrease NUE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1130 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
TreatmentIncreasing nutsedge density e0 Outcomeseed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “In creasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame produced the greatest significant reduction in broomrape density .
InteractorBroomrape e0 parasite OutcomeBroomrape density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that sesame had most significant decrease in Broomrape density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–967 e1 “damage reduction to tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–246 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutsedge density decrease d rapidly at 570 L·ha –1 Propozone.
Outcomenutsedge density e0 Directionrapid decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Examined data in dicated that there was a rapid decrease in nutsedge density with 570 L·ha –1 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 t0 “TOMATO NUTRIENT ABSORPTION AND NUTSEDGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant S-metolachlor did not reduce purple nutsedge density .
TreatmentS -metolachlor e0 Interactorpurple nutsedge e0 weed Outcomepurple nutsedge density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatornontreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were in effective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bulk density under no tillage (NT) could in crease or decrease
Outcomebulk density (BD) e1 Directionincrease or decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “for winter wheat crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–341 e1 “The results revealed that physical properties such as bulk density (BD) can in crease or decrease under NT, while soil water content (SWC) in creased under the same system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–969 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Moldboard tillage decrease d soil bulk density .
Treatmentmoldboard tillage e0 Outcomesoil bulk density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The use of moldboard tillage led to a decrease in soil bulk density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1224 e1 “winter wheat crop formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Replacing ploughing with cultivating and harrowing significantly decrease d spike density .
Treatmentcultivating and harrowing e0 Outcomespike density per 1 m 2 e0 Verbatim
t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 e0 “Replacing ploughing with cultivating and harrowing affected a significant decrease in the plant height and spike density per 1 m 2 of winter wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1597 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High application rates of compost tended to decrease soil bulk density relative to an unamended control.
Treatmenthigh application rates e4 Comparatorunamended control e4 Verbatim
t0 “Improves Potato Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–116 e4 “Relative to an unamended control, the high application rates tended to decrease bulk density and in crease total N in soil, but no differences were detected between the compost or composted biochar treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1340 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Larval density fell sharply after potato budding.
Outcomedensity of phytophagous larvae e0 Directionsharp decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The seasonal dynamics of in sect numbers is characterized by a sharp decrease in the density of phytophagous larvae after budding of potato plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1651 t0 “Colorado potato beetle ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–84 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher planting density decrease d branch number and leaf area per plant.
TreatmentIncrease in planting density e0 Outcomenumber of branches and the leaf area per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In crease in planting density caused the main stem length to in crease and the number of branches and the leaf area per plant to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–361 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.