Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

258 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 28 non-evaluative

Over time

1980 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine-day irrigation reduced leaf relative water content.

Treatment: 9 dayse0
Outcome: relative water content in leavese0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“increase in the duration of the irrigation period to 9 days resulted in a decrease in the characteristics of the study (dry weight, chlorophyll content, relative water content in leaves)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–807

Title

Effect of abscisic acid and superabsorbent polymer on tolerance of Abelmoschus esculentus to drought

Intedhar Abbas Marhoon International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 2019. doi:10.26452/ijrps.v10i1.1885

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Nine-day irrigation reduced plant dry weight.
Intervention effect Nine-day irrigation reduced chlorophyll content.
Intervention effect Nine-day irrigation increased soil water deficit.
Intervention effect Three-day irrigation exceeded the other treatments on studied traits.
Intervention effect Abyssic acid spraying, especially at 6 mg / L, increased studied traits.
Intervention effect Polymer soil mixing improved studied indicators.
Intervention effect Polymer soil mixing increased resistance to water scarcity.
Association Irrigation duration with alfalfa and soil polymer addition significantly affected most traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly decreased leaf relative water content and leaf water potential in all cultivars.

Taxon: Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment: water deficite1
Outcome: leaf relative water content and leaf water potentiale0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Medicago sativa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–73

e0
“led to a significant decrease in leaf relative water content and leaf water potential”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–595

e1
“In all cultivars, water deficit stress reduced the whole plant growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–470

Title

Differential response to water deficit stress in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars: Growth, water relations, osmolyte accumulation and lipid peroxidation

Inès Slama AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY 2011. doi:10.5897/ajb11.1202

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Water deficit reduced whole plant growth in all cultivars.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased root/shoot DW ratio in all cultivars.
Intervention effect Proline and soluble sugar concentrations increased significantly under water deficit in most cultivars.
Observation Tamantit showed the best tolerance to water deficit.
Observation Under stress, Tamantit produced more biomass than other cultivars.
Observation Tamantit had preferential root development.
Observation Tamantit had better ability to accumulate proline and soluble sugars.
Observation Tamantit protected its photosynthetic apparatus against oxidative stress associated with water deficit.
Observation Ecotipo Siciliano was the most sensitive cultivar.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible cultivars showed lower relative water content and grain yield under drought.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Marvi, TD-1 and SKD-1e1
Outcome: relative water contents and grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“decrease in relative water contents and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1022

e1
“Marvi, TD-1 and SKD-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1135

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53

Title

Morpho-physiological characterization of spring wheat genotypes under drought stress

M. J. Baloch; Jim M. Dunwell; Naqib Ullah Khan; et al. CentAUR (University of Reading) 2013

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water stress significantly affected stomatal dimensions and conductance.
Intervention effect Water stress significantly affected relative leaf water content.
Intervention effect Water stress significantly affected grain yield.
Intervention effect Water stress had no reported effect on stomatal density.
Association The irrigation by cultivar interaction for grain yield was non-significant.
Observation Anmol, Moomal, Bhittai and Sarsabz were drought tolerant.
Observation Drought tolerant cultivars had smaller stomatal dimensions and lower conductance under stress.
Observation Drought tolerant cultivars had higher relative water content under stress.
Observation Drought tolerant cultivars produced higher grain yield.
Observation Marvi, TD-1 and SKD-1 were characterized as drought susceptible.
Observation Susceptible cultivars showed higher stomatal attributes under drought.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation decreased wheat grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, photosystem II efficiency and relative water content.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: water limitatione0
Outcome: grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“water limitation led to a decrease in the grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–695

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99

Title

Effects of Biofertilizers and Nano Zinc-Iron Oxide on Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat under Water Deficit Conditions

Raouf Seyed Sharifi; Razieh Khalilzadeh; Alireza Pirzad; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2020. doi:10.1080/00103624.2020.1845350

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Water limitation increased proline, soluble sugars and catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities.
Intervention effect Biofertilizer application increased proline, soluble sugars and enzyme activities.
Intervention effect Nanooxide application increased proline, soluble sugars and enzyme activities.
Intervention effect Zn-Fe oxide nanoparticles lowered electrical conductivity by 17% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Zn-Fe oxide nanoparticles increased peroxidase activity by 27% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Zn-Fe oxide nanoparticles increased polyphenol oxidase by 61% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Azotobacter with nano Zn-Fe oxide increased grain yield by 88% compared with control under severe water limitation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought slightly significantly decreased relative water content in C2.

Taxon: Ae. crassae0
Material: C2e0
Treatment: drought treatmente0
Outcome: relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“At the end of drought treatment, a slightly significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) was shown in two Ae. crassa accessions (C2 and C3)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–593

t0
“Controlled Drought”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101

Title

Response of Three Accessions of Jordanian Aegilops Crassa Boiss and Durum Wheat to Controlled Drought

Amal M. Harb; Jamil N. Lahham Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences 2013. doi:10.12816/0000273

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Drought slightly significantly decreased relative water content in C3.
Intervention effect C1 relative water content did not change under drought.
Intervention effect Durum wheat relative water content did not change under drought.
Intervention effect Drought had minimal effect on chlorophyll content in all Aegilops accessions and durum wheat.
Intervention effect Drought had minimal effect on chlorophyll fluorescence in all Aegilops accessions and durum wheat.
Intervention effect Drought did not significantly change C2 biomass.
Intervention effect Drought did not significantly change C3 biomass.
Intervention effect Drought significantly decreased C1 biomass.
Intervention effect Drought highly significantly decreased durum wheat biomass.
Recommendation The authors identify C2 and C3 as promising sources for engineering drought tolerant wheat.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought slightly significantly decreased relative water content in C3.

Taxon: Ae. crassae0
Material: C3e0
Treatment: drought treatmente0
Outcome: relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“At the end of drought treatment, a slightly significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) was shown in two Ae. crassa accessions (C2 and C3)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–593

t0
“Controlled Drought”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101

Title

Response of Three Accessions of Jordanian Aegilops Crassa Boiss and Durum Wheat to Controlled Drought

Amal M. Harb; Jamil N. Lahham Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences 2013. doi:10.12816/0000273

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Drought slightly significantly decreased relative water content in C2.
Intervention effect C1 relative water content did not change under drought.
Intervention effect Durum wheat relative water content did not change under drought.
Intervention effect Drought had minimal effect on chlorophyll content in all Aegilops accessions and durum wheat.
Intervention effect Drought had minimal effect on chlorophyll fluorescence in all Aegilops accessions and durum wheat.
Intervention effect Drought did not significantly change C2 biomass.
Intervention effect Drought did not significantly change C3 biomass.
Intervention effect Drought significantly decreased C1 biomass.
Intervention effect Drought highly significantly decreased durum wheat biomass.
Recommendation The authors identify C2 and C3 as promising sources for engineering drought tolerant wheat.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S1 decreased leaf relative water content by 17%.

Taxon: safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
Treatment: S1 irrigation levele0
Outcome: relative water content (RWC) of the leafe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 17 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“safflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61

e0
“The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615

Title

Improving the physiological properties and yield of safflower by combining organic and chemical nitrogen in different irrigation cut-off conditions

Eisa Maghsoudi; Alireza Yadavi; Hamidreza Balouchi; et al. Industrial Crops and Products 2024. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119601

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Stem-elongation irrigation cut-off decreased Fv/Fm by 5%.
Intervention effect S1 decreased leaf chlorophyll by 22%.
Intervention effect S1 decreased leaf soluble proteins by 21%.
Intervention effect S1 increased electrolyte leakage by 33%.
Intervention effect S1 increased carotenoids by 43%.
Intervention effect S1 increased proline by 42%.
Intervention effect S1 increased leaf soluble sugars by 39%.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer alone or combined with chemical fertilizer raised Fv/Fm, RWC and chlorophyll under cut-off.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer raised leaf soluble proteins under irrigation cut-off.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer decreased carotenoids, proline and soluble sugars.
Observation Complete irrigation gave the highest biological yield of 21.62 t ha −1.
Observation N3 gave the highest biological yield of 21.93 t ha −1.
Intervention effect N3 increased grain yield by 3.34 t ha −1 in 2015.
Intervention effect N2 increased grain yield by 3.56 t ha −1 in 2016.
Observation Vegetative-stage irrigation cut-off had the greatest negative biological-yield effect.
Observation Flowering and pollination irrigation cut-off was most detrimental for grain yield.
Intervention effect N2 and N3 reduced the negative impact of water deficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation lowered SPAD, Fv/Fm, relative water content and grain yield.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: water limitatione0
Outcome: SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), Fv/Fm, relative water content, and grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“water limitation caused a decrease in SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), Fv/Fm, relative water content, and grain yield of barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–882

Title

Effect of Biofertilizer and Nano-Fe Oxide Foliar Application on Alleviation of Water Deficit in Yield and Some Physico-Chemical Properties of Barley

R. Seyed Sharifi; R. Khalilzadeh; S. Dadashzadeh Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2024. doi:10.1134/s1021443723602938

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Water limitation increased electrical conductivity, proline, soluble sugars and enzyme activities.
Intervention effect Combined nano-iron and AM fungi plus PGPR increased relative water content and proline.
Observation Highest proline occurred with maximum nano-iron and mycorrhiza plus Azospirillum at every irrigation level.
Intervention effect Mycorrhiza and PGPR increased catalase activity by 44.7% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Mycorrhiza and PGPR increased peroxidase activity by 105.3% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Mycorrhiza and PGPR increased polyphenol oxidase activity by 107.5% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Iron deficiency reduced catalase and peroxidase activity under water deficit.
Intervention effect AM fungi and PGPR increased grain yield 10.35% under severe water stress.
Recommendation Authors recommend nano-iron spraying with mycorrhiza and Azospirillum for barley production in semi-arid areas.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation reduced lettuce leaf relative water content, stomatal conductance, and nutrient content.

Taxon: lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment: lower irrigation levelse0
Outcome: leaf relative water content (LRWC), stomatal conductance (SC), and plant nutrient element contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“lower irrigation levels caused a decrease in leaf relative water content (LRWC), stomatal conductance (SC), and plant nutrient element content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1195

t0
“Lettuce”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–124

Title

Ameliorative Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on Water-yield Relationships, Growth, and Nutrient Uptake of Lettuce Plants under Different Irrigation Levels

Ustun Sahin; Melek Ekinci; Fatih Mehmet Kiziloglu; et al. HortScience 2015. doi:10.21273/hortsci.50.9.1379

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Lower irrigation reduced lettuce growth, head weights, and yield.
Intervention effect Lower irrigation increased lettuce electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation.
Intervention effect PGPR inoculation increased lettuce growth, nutrient content, water content, stomatal conductance, and yield under lower irrigation.
Intervention effect PGPR inoculation decreased lettuce electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde under lower irrigation.
Recommendation The authors conclude that PGPR can alleviate low irrigation effects on lettuce growth and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative leaf water content increased as irrigation decreased.

Taxon: guavaPsidium guajavat0
Treatment: decrease in the irrigation regimee0
Outcome: relative leaf water content (RLWC)e0
Direction: increasing trende0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–94

e0
“both the relative leaf water content (RLWC) and the proline content exhibited an increasing trend with a decrease in the irrigation regime”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–807

Title

Deficit irrigation scheduling with mulching and yield prediction of guava (Psidium guajava L.) in a subtropical humid region

Rajkumar Jat; V. P. Singh; Salwan Ali Abed; et al. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1044886

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Proline content increased 123% under DI 50 compared with FI 100.
Intervention effect Fully irrigated guava plants had greater growth.
Intervention effect Silver-black mulch produced greater plant growth.
Intervention effect FI 100 produced significantly higher leaf nutrient concentrations.
Intervention effect M OM produced significantly higher leaf nutrient concentrations.
Intervention effect DI 75 with M SB produced more fruits per plant, higher fruit weights, and higher fruit yields.
Intervention effect DI 75 with M SB produced maximum ascorbic acid content.
Intervention effect DI 50 improved irrigation water productivity by 33.79% compared with FI 100.
Method / resource Regression analysis outperformed principal component regression for fruit yield prediction.
Association Leaf proline, leaf Cu, fruit weight, and IWP were the most important predictors of guava fruit yield.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics