View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield.
QualifierThis decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
Treatment58% population decrease e0 Comparator164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any in crease or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield.
Treatmentincrease or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any in crease or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each 2 °C decrease corresponded to a 3.1 cm decrease in canopy height.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “for every 2 °C decrease there was a 3.1 centimeter decrease in canopy height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–952 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At high populations, the decrease in barley grain yield was accompanied by a comparable decrease in grains per unit area.
Treatmenthigh populations e1 Outcomenumber of grains per unit area e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 e1 “a decrease in grain yield at high populations was associated with a comparable decrease in the number of grains per unit area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1397 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A sharp NP decrease reduced efficiency.
Treatmenta sharp decrease in NP e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a sharp decrease in NP led to a decrease in efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1627 t0 “grain crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield.
Treatmenttotal precipitation for the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yields by an average of 0.736 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in zein fractions under low nitrogen was offset by a large decrease in grain protein content.
Treatmentlow N conditions e0 Outcomegrain protein content e0 Verbatim
e0 “The advantages of a decrease in zein fractions in QPM under low N conditions were offset by a large decrease in grain protein content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1255 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 30% output price decrease reduced in tercropping BCR by 30%.
Treatmentdecrease in output prices e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A 30% decrease in the former leads to a decrease in NPV and BCR by 38% and 30%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1535 e1 “decrease in output prices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1407 e2 “Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.)) and Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–274 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.