View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter was 35% of fresh foliage biomass .
Outcomefresh foliage biomass e0 Qualifierfresh foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “it was 35% of the fresh foliage biomass and 60% of the fresh woody biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2675–2749 t0 “Black wattle (Acacia mearnsii ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
About 50% of biomass was lost over winter, mainly foliage .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “About 50% of the biomass was lost during the winter, mainly in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass .
Outcometotal foliage biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Shortleaf Pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 e0 “thinning seemed to reduce the total foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1045 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
All treatments allocated the most biomass to foliage .
Outcomemore biomass to foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “All treatments allocated more biomass to foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2034 t0 “Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1129 Other claims from this paper (18) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH regressions predicted branch and foliage biomass poorly.
Outcomebiomass of branch and foliage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the precision and reliability were poor of the regressions between the DBH and the biomass of branch and foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–948 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The most susceptible genotypes lost root and foliage biomass .
Materialmost susceptible genotypes e0 Outcomebiomass loss in root and foliage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Avocado ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 e0 “biomass loss in root and foliage in the most susceptible genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1304 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
P. macrocarpa allocated proportionally more biomass to foliage .
Outcomebiomass in foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “P. macrocarpa and M. altissima in vested proportionally more biomass in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
M. altissima allocated proportionally more biomass to foliage .
Outcomebiomass in foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “P. macrocarpa and M. altissima in vested proportionally more biomass in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Branches and foliage contributed a low proportion of D. vario-striata biomass .
Outcomeproportion of biomass of branch and foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The proportion of biomass of branch and foliage was low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1263 t0 “dendrocalamopsis vario-striata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Thorns and foliage accounted for 13% of biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “followed by thorns+ foliage (13%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–369 e1 “Bambusa bambos ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–79 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.