View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The two community forests showed a decrease in tree density .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in tree density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1222 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
Treatmentincreasing the density e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Conditions in ducing more cell enlargement were in terpreted to decrease sclereid density .
Outcomesclereid density e0 Qualifiermore cell enlargement inducing condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “more cell enlargement in ducing condition result in a decrease in the sclereid density in pear fruits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1448 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Both application timings caused a similar decrease in subsequent pest population density .
Outcomepest population density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leading to a similar decrease in pest population density in the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–890 t0 “cork oak forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–125 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative density and basal area in dices of Leguminosae decrease with altitude.
Outcomerelative density and basal area indices e1 Verbatim
e1 “The hydromegathermal families such as Leguminosae present relative density and basal area in dices that decrease with altitude ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1865 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity did not decrease stomatal density .
Outcomestomatal density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Settingintermediate salinity site e0 Verbatim
e0 “in creasing salinities did not decrease stomatal density ( in termediate salinity site: 73.4 stomata.mm2 SD= 13.5; high salinity site: 74.8 stomata.mm2 SD= 17.3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2390 t0 “Rhizophora mangle ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation hypothesis original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Selecting clones on fast growth alone may decrease hybrid aspen wood density .
Treatmentselecting clones based on fast growth only e6 Outcomehybrid aspen wood density e6 Verbatim
t0 “in hybrid aspen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 e6 “selecting clones based on fast growth only may be challenging since it may lead to a decrease in hybrid aspen wood density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1346 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield.
Treatmenttraining to an espalier shape e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Qualifierwith and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Poplar forest canopy density was associated with decrease Anoplophora glabripennis abundance.
Outcomequantity of Anoplophora glabripennis e0 Not reported Interactor role
Verbatim
e0 “The quantity of Anoplophora glabripennis decrease with the in crease of coverage and canopy density ,and the quantity of Anoplophora glabripennis at the edge of forest is bigger than the ones in side the forest. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–476 t0 “Poplar Forest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree diameter showed a marginal, non-significant decrease with in creasing planting density .
Treatmentplanting density e3 Comparator500 trees per hectare e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 e1 “Rubber was planted in three high densities, i.e., 600, 700 and 800 trees per hectare, with the presently recommended level of 500 trees per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1277 e3 “Though not statistically significant, there was a marginal decrease in tree diameter with the in crease in planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2004 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.