View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Both application timings caused a similar decrease in subsequent pest population density .
pest population density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leading to a similar decrease in pest population density in the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–890 t0 “cork oak forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–125 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean fruit mass decrease d by about 35% with each decrease in cropping density .
cropping density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 e1 “Mean fruit mass decrease d by about 35% with each decrease in cropping density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–285 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield.
training to an espalier shape e0 does not decrease e0 with and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wood changes caused by in sect damage led to a decrease in charcoal density .
damaged by defoliating insects e0 defoliating insects e0 pest healthy condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla (clone A) and Eucalyptus saligna (clone B) trees, both in healthy condition and damaged by defoliating in sects ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–389 e1 “and a decrease in density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–985 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree diameter showed a marginal, non-significant decrease with in creasing planting density .
planting density e3 500 trees per hectare e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 e1 “Rubber was planted in three high densities, i.e., 600, 700 and 800 trees per hectare, with the presently recommended level of 500 trees per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1277 e3 “Though not statistically significant, there was a marginal decrease in tree diameter with the in crease in planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2004 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High soil bulk density did not decrease Avicennia root growth.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “High BD decrease d root growth of R. stylosa , but not A. marina . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root tip density per surface and root area in dex tended to decrease under ozone.
ozone-fumigated e1 root tip density per surface, root area index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights, total number of root tips, number of vital mycorrhizal root tips, fine root (mass) density , root tip density per surface, root area in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–2085 e1 “ozone-fumigated plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2223 t0 “Beech ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Added growth from nitrogen fertilization usually decrease s wood density in the hard pines.
nitrogen fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “added growth from nitrogen fertilization will decrease wood density in the hard pines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–428 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density decrease d those in dices per plant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “but these in dices decrease in the evaluations per plant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1057 t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–23 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Prunus cerasust0
Quercus suber
Malus domestica
Olea.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Eucalyptus
Hevea brasiliensis
Avicennia marina
Vitis