View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low temperature at grain filling decrease d grain weight per panicle .
low temperature e1 grain weight per panicle e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “which resulted in grain weight per panicle decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1007 e1 “low temperature during grain -filling stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–955 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Controlled water treatment during 1-10 days after heading decrease d grain s per panicle and 1 000- grain weight .
CWT during 1～10 days after heading stage e0 grains per panicle and 1 000-grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “yield of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 t1 “cold region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 e0 “CWT during 1～10 days after heading stage enabled grain s per panicle and 1 000- grain weight to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–655 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing salinity significantly decrease d rice panicle number, panicle length and spikelets per panicle .
increased salinity stress e0 number of panicles, panicle length, spikelets per panicle e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “number of panicle s, panicle length, spikelets per panicle , filled grain and grain weight also significantly decrease with the increased salinity stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–719 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under stacking, grain yield increase was associated with more filled spikelets per panicle and higher 1000- grain weight .
stacking condition e2 number of filled spikelets per panicle, 1000-grain weight e2 Verbatim
t0 “YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 e2 “The grain yield increase under stacking condition was supported by the increase in the number of filled spikelets per panicle , 1000- grain weight and decrease in sterility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1247 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Shakkorkhora rose 12% over control. Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Chinigura rose 23% over control. Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Kalijira rose 29% over control. Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Kataribhog rose 18% over control. Association With stacking, yield of Shakkorkhora rose 0.6% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Chinigura rose 25% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kalijira rose 18% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kataribhog rose 11% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Shakkorkhora rose 18% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Chinigura rose 27% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kalijira rose 35% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kataribhog rose 80% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association Under stacking, sterility decreased. Association Under stacking at 120 kg N ha-1, the number of filled grain per panicle and 1000-grain weight increased. Association The highest grain yield was observed at 60 kg N ha-1 under non-stacking condition. Intervention effect Kataribhog with stacking at 120 kg N ha-1 produced 3.7 t ha-1 grain yield, higher than 2 t ha-1 under non-stacking. Association Under stacking, Shakkorkhora, Kalijira and Kataribhog showed their highest yielding ability at 120 kg N ha-1. Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under stacking, sterility decrease d.
stacking condition e2 Verbatim
t0 “YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 e2 “The grain yield increase under stacking condition was supported by the increase in the number of filled spikelets per panicle , 1000- grain weight and decrease in sterility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1247 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Shakkorkhora rose 12% over control. Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Chinigura rose 23% over control. Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Kalijira rose 29% over control. Intervention effect Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Kataribhog rose 18% over control. Association With stacking, yield of Shakkorkhora rose 0.6% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Chinigura rose 25% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kalijira rose 18% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kataribhog rose 11% at 60 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Shakkorkhora rose 18% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Chinigura rose 27% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kalijira rose 35% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association With stacking, yield of Kataribhog rose 80% at 120 kg N ha-1. Association Under stacking, grain yield increase was associated with more filled spikelets per panicle and higher 1000-grain weight. Association Under stacking at 120 kg N ha-1, the number of filled grain per panicle and 1000-grain weight increased. Association The highest grain yield was observed at 60 kg N ha-1 under non-stacking condition. Intervention effect Kataribhog with stacking at 120 kg N ha-1 produced 3.7 t ha-1 grain yield, higher than 2 t ha-1 under non-stacking. Association Under stacking, Shakkorkhora, Kalijira and Kataribhog showed their highest yielding ability at 120 kg N ha-1. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition significantly decrease d wheat plant height, productive tillers, grain s per panicle and grain weight .
Weed competition e0 plant height, productive tillerslm row length, grainslpanicle and 1,000 grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Weed competition resulted in significant decrease in wheat plant height, productive tillerslm row length, grain slpanicle and 1,000 grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1382 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition significantly decrease d wheat plant height, productive tillers and grain s per panicle .
Weed competition e4 plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grains/panicle e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 e4 “Weed competition resulted in significant decrease in wheat plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grain s/ panicle and 1,000 grain weight and lowered crop yield by 27.2% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1415 Other claims from this paper (13) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attribute the improved grain quality under super sparse cultivation to more spikelets per panicle , lower leaf weight per grain at full heading and a reduced grain filling rate.
super sparse cultivation e1 an increase in the number of spikelets per panicle, a decrease in the weight of leaf per grain at full heading, and reduced grain filling rate e1 Verbatim
e0 “three hybrid rice varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–752 e1 “The increase in grain quality in super sparse cultivation was due to an increase in the number of spikelets per panicle , a decrease in the weight of leaf per grain at full heading, and reduced grain filling rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1776 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High nitrogen decrease d inside- panicle yield components.
Japonica Super Rice t0 weight per pani-cle,1000-grain weight,seed setting rate e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Japonica Super Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 e0 “the decrease of factors inside panicle s( weight per pani-cle,1000- grain weight ,seed setting rate,total number of grain s per panicle ,number of filled grain s per panicle ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–868 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The grain yield loss after delayed sowing was mainly due to fewer grain s per panicle .
Two weeks delay of sowing time e3 mainly due to lower grain number in panicle e3 Verbatim
t0 “naked and hulled oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 e3 “Two weeks delay of sowing time caused significant decrease in grain yield mainly due to lower grain number in panicle and slightly decrease weight of 1000 grain s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1118 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativat0
Triticum aestivum
Avena sativa