View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants grown from control and cryopreserved tips were phenotypically similar .
Organ / stageshoot tips e0 Outcomephenotypically similar e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Plants produced from control and cryopreserved shoot tips were phenotypically similar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–625 t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–30 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The selected line was phenotypically similar to its parent line.
Outcomephenotypically similar e1 Verbatim
e0 “Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 e1 “was phenotypically similar to the parent line ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–663 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Control and cryopreserved plants were phenotypically similar .
Outcomephenotypically similar e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants produced from control and cryopreserved shoot tips were phenotypically similar . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–846 t0 “redwood ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants regenerated from cryopreserved rose shoot tips were phenotypically similar to plants from control shoot tips.
Treatmentcryopreserved shoot tips e6 Outcomephenotypically similar e6 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro grown roses (Rosa hybrida L.) cv. Fairy and wild roses (Rosa sp.) shoot tips were used for cryopreservation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–344 e6 “Plants produced from control and cryopreserved shoot tips were phenotypically similar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1158 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Surviving betaCA1 deficient seedlings were phenotypically similar to wild type, including after subambient CO2 growth.
Outcomephenotypically similar e0 Comparatorwild-type plants e0 Settingsubambient levels of CO2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The small number of surviving seedlings able to grow and develop are phenotypically similar to wild-type plants, even when subsequently grown at subambient levels of CO2. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1223 t0 “Arabidopsis Seedling Survivorship ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–111 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Without NaCl, antisense M6PR celery lines were mostly phenotypically similar to wild type.
Treatmentantisense transformants e0 Outcomephenotypically similar e0 QualifierIn the absence of NaCl e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In the absence of NaCl, and despite the lack of any significant accumulation of mannitol that is normally the major photosynthetic product, antisense transformants were mostly phenotypically similar to the WT celery. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–801 e1 “antisense M6PR transformants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–489 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spike number was similar for all mixtures and their midcomponents.
Comparatormidcomponents e1 Verbatim
e1 “The spike number m –2 was similar for all mixtures and their midcomponents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1439 t0 “Mixture performance of phenotypically contrasting barley cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect Early, short:late, tall same-row mixture yielded 13% more than the midcomponent in 1991. Intervention effect Early, tall:late, tall same-row mixture yielded 14% more than the midcomponent in 1992. Intervention effect Alternate-row mixtures yielded similar or significantly greater than their monocrops in 1991 and 1992, except one mixture. Intervention effect Late, short cultivar in alternate-row mixture with early, tall cultivar yielded significantly lower than monocrop in 1991. Intervention effect Early, short:late, short alternate-row mixture produced 7.0% more spikes than the midcomponent in 1992. Association Same-row mixtures of early, short:late, tall and early, tall:late, tall cultivars had the best combining abilities. Intervention effect Phenotypically contrasting barley mixtures may give a yield advantage over monocrops. Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CAX1 expressing rice resembled wild type phenotypically throughout growth.
MaterialCAX1 expressing transgenic rice plants e0 Qualifierduring the whole growth period e0 Verbatim
e0 “The CAX1 expressing transgenic rice plants were similar in phenotype to the wild type during the whole growth period. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–595 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Haploids and diploids were similar in bush habit and leaf, flower, and fruit shapes.
Outcomebush habitus and the shapes of leaves, flowers, and fruit e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “these plants were phenotypically similar with respect to qualitative characteristics, such as the bush habitus and the shapes of leaves, flowers, and fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–335 t0 “haploid and diploid Mikado tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.