Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, relative water content of Nicotiana glauca did not decrease with drought.

Taxon: Nicotiana glaucaNicotiana glaucat0
Treatment: droughte0
Outcome: relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0
Setting: In the fielde0

Verbatim

t0
“in the cosmopolitan invader Nicotiana glauca”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–95

e0
“In the field, water potential, photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance (gs), but not relative water content (RWC) decreased because of drought”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–722

Title

Ecophysiological responses to drought and salinity in the cosmopolitan invader Nicotiana glauca

Armando González; Wilmer Tezara; Elizabeth Rengifo; et al. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 2012. doi:10.1590/s1677-04202012000300008

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf water content did not significantly decrease during drought stress.

Taxon: chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment: drought stresse0
Outcome: SLWCe0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131

e0
“SLFW and SLWC did not significantly decrease during drought stress period.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1364

Title

Relative leaf expansion rate and other leaf-related indicators for detection of drought stress in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).

Laily Ilman Widuri; Benyamin Lakitan; Mery Hasmeda; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2017. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.12.pne800

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Relative leaf expansion rate varied mainly with the day-night cycle rather than gradual drought.
Intervention effect Specific leaf fresh weight did not significantly decrease during drought stress.
Intervention effect Drought stress significantly inhibited total leaf area.
Intervention effect Chili pepper recovered after four days of drought stress.
Intervention effect Chili pepper did not recover after eight days or longer of drought stress.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content, RNA, and protein were unchanged before visible wilt in infected leaves.

Taxon: ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Interactor: Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaet1pathogen
Outcome: relative water content, RNA, and protein levelse0
Direction: No changese0
Qualifier: before the appearance of visible wilte0

Verbatim

t0
“Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitam)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–170

t1
“Verticillium dahliae”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–56

e0
“No changes in relative water content, RNA, and protein levels and a slight decrease in chlorophyll level were detected within infected leaf tissue before the appearance of visible wilt.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–715

Title

Influence of Defoliate Pathotype of Verticillium dahliae on Some Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitam)

S. J. Sanei; Seyed Esmael Razavi Journal of ornamental and horticultural plants 2018

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steady water tables at 5 and 10 cm did not restrain relative leaf expansion rate.

Taxon: tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: steady water table at 5-cm and 10-cm depthe0
Outcome: relative leaf expansion rate (RLER)e0
Direction: did not restraine0
Comparator: Untreated control plantse1

Verbatim

e0
“steady water table at 5-cm and 10-cm depth did not restrain relative leaf expansion rate (RLER)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1140

e1
“Untreated control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–821

t0
“tomato plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–135

Title

Steady shallow water table did not decrease leaf expansion rate, specific leaf weight, and specific leaf water content in tomato plants

Mei Meihana; STIPER Sriwigama, Palembang 30137, Indonesia; Benyamin Lakitan; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2017. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.12.pne808

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource A zero intercept linear model was selected for tomato leaf area estimation.
Intervention effect Specific leaf fresh weight did not differ significantly between treated and untreated plants.
Intervention effect Specific leaf water content did not differ significantly between treated and untreated plants.
Observation Steady shallow water tables at 5 cm or deeper did not affect tomato growth.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: Leaf chlorophyll contente4
Direction: unchangede4
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e4
“Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–703

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low night temperature did not increase transpiration of sweet pepper

Taxon: sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment: LNTe1
Outcome: transpiratione1
Direction: no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The response of sweet pepper seedlings to different doses of low night temperature (LNT) (1/4/7 nights at 6/18 °C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–499

e1
“LNT reduced water uptake and relative water content (RWC) of plant tissues probably due to a decrease of hydraulic conductivity but not to an increase of transpiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–753

Title

Physiological Processes Affected by Low Night Temperatures in Sweet Pepper Plants

E. Gorbe Sánchez; E. Heuvelink; C. Stanghellini Procedia Environmental Sciences 2015. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.189

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Low night temperature reduced water uptake and relative water content of sweet pepper plant tissues
Intervention effect Low night temperature enhanced the accumulation of sucrose and starch in sweet pepper leaves during the night
Association Starch accumulation did not affect photosynthesis in sweet pepper, due to feedback inhibition
Intervention effect Photo-inhibition was observed in sweet pepper after 7 cold nights
Intervention effect CO2 uptake of sweet pepper was not affected after 7 cold nights
Intervention effect Total dry weight production of sweet pepper was not affected after 7 cold nights
Intervention effect Low night temperature decreased specific leaf area of sweet pepper
Intervention effect Low night temperature led to shorter sweet pepper plants
Intervention effect Low night temperature led to thicker sweet pepper leaves
Intervention effect Low night temperature led to smaller sweet pepper leaves
Mechanism Loss of turgor from reduced relative water content reduced stem elongation and leaf expansion in sweet pepper
Mechanism The decrease of cell elongation in sweet pepper was due to reduced water uptake capacity
Intervention effect Low night temperature did not stop the clock that regulates sweet pepper plant processes

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium caused no reliable difference in cellular juice concentration in red Lolo Ross lettuce.

Taxon: Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativae0
Material: red Lolo Rosse2
Treatment: cadmium ionse0
Outcome: concentration of cell juicee3
Direction: absence of a reliable differencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the effect of cadmium ions on the water exchange parameters in green Lolo and red Lolo Ross varieties of Lactuca sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–160

e2
“the water deficit decrease, an increase in the parameters of relative turgescence and free water content to the fourteenth day of exposure was noted for the red Lolo Ross variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1154

e3
“the absence of a reliable difference in the parameter of the concentration of cell juice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1253

Title

Water exchange parameters of lettuce plants under the action of cadmium ions

I. Khomenk; O. Kosyk; N. Taran Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Series “Psychology” 2018. doi:10.17721/1728_2748.2018.76.20-25

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Cadmium increased the water deficit of green Lolo lettuce compared with control.
Intervention effect Cadmium reduced relative turgescence, free water content and cellular juice concentration in green Lolo lettuce compared with control.
Intervention effect Cadmium decreased the water deficit of red Lolo Ross lettuce by the fourteenth day of exposure.
Intervention effect Cadmium increased relative turgescence and free water content in red Lolo Ross lettuce by the fourteenth day of exposure.
Intervention effect Cadmium increased xeromorphism of leaf blades in green Lolo lettuce.
Intervention effect Cadmium increased xeromorphism of leaf blades in red Lolo Ross lettuce.
Intervention effect Cadmium increased stomata density in green Lolo lettuce.
Intervention effect Cadmium increased stomata density in red Lolo Ross lettuce.
Observation In Lolo lettuce most stomata were locked in, unlike the Ross variety.
Observation Red Lolo Ross lettuce has higher adaptive capacity to cadmium than Lolo, according to the authors.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt concentration non significantly affected number of leaves and number of roots.

Taxon: Apple (M. pomila)Malus domesticat0
Treatment: increasing salt concentratione0
Outcome: number of leaves and number of rootse0
Direction: non significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results of this work indicate that increasing salt concentration in the nutrient solution leads to: (a) a decline in the stomata conductance (b) the reduction of leaf chlorophyll content (c) to a decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content (d) the reduction of vegetative shoot growth, diameter of stem and trunk width area (e) significantly decrease in the leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–2262

t0
“Apple (M. pomila)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29

Title

Response of Apple (M. pomila) Dwarf Rootstocks To Salinity Stress

Amim Alizadeh; Valida Alizade 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration decline stomata conductance.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration reduction leaf chlorophyll content.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration decrease leaf water potential and relative water content.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration reduction vegetative shoot growth, diameter of stem and trunk width area.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration decrease leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh and dry weight.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration increase percentage of dead leaves.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration increase root/leaf ratio.
Intervention effect Increasing salt concentration increase proline amino acid and soluble sugars content in leaves.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics