View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought treatments significantly decrease d soil water content , leaf water potential, and leaf relative water content .
TreatmentDrought treatments (M2 and M3) e0 Outcomesoil water content, leaf water potential, leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Macroptilium bracteatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–74 e0 “Drought treatments (M2 and M3) significantly (P < 0.05) decrease soil water content , leaf water potential, leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–773 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the data of photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–820 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and relative water content .
Outcomephotosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–665 t0 “cluster bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d leaf relative water content across cultivars.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease of leaf relative water content was found in tested cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–453 e1 “drought stress was in itiated by withholding water for 14 d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–338 t0 “yellow lupin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing water level significantly decrease d relative water content and membrane stability in dex in Cassia occidentalis .
Treatmentdecrease in water level e0 Outcomerelative water content and membrane stability index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Physiological parameters like leaf area in dex, biomass accumulation, relative water content and membrane stability in dex decrease d significantly with decrease in water level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–867 t0 “Cassia occidentalis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content and leaf osmotic potential in forage rape.
Treatmentwater-deficit treatment e2 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) and leaf osmotic potential e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in the leaves with different maturities in forage rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–328 e1 “The significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) and leaf osmotic potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–427 e2 “after 5 d of water -deficit treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–494 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly reduced relative water content .
TreatmentDrought stress at 50% heading stage e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “paddy varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–110 e0 “Drought stress at 50% heading stage led to a significant decrease in relative water content , percentage in filled grain and grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–949 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d leaf relative water content and leaf water potential in all cultivars.
Outcomeleaf relative water content and leaf water potential e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Medicago sativa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–73 e0 “led to a significant decrease in leaf relative water content and leaf water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–595 e1 “In all cultivars, water deficit stress reduced the whole plant growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–470 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought slightly significantly decrease d relative water content in C2.
Treatmentdrought treatment e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the end of drought treatment, a slightly significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) was shown in two Ae. crassa accessions (C2 and C3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–593 t0 “Controlled Drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.