View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf dry weight showed the largest decrease among dry mass components.
Directionmost considerable decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Among the plant dry components, leaf dry weight had the most considerable decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1586 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treated wastewater showed a nonsignificant dry weight decrease .
Treatmenttreated wastewater e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treated and untreated wastewater showed insignificant decrease in dry weight of barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1138 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Untreated wastewater showed a nonsignificant dry weight decrease .
Treatmentuntreated wastewater e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treated and untreated wastewater showed insignificant decrease in dry weight of barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1138 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions led to a decrease in honeysuckle fruit weight .
TreatmentDry conditions e1 Outcomethe weight of the fruit e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HONEYSUCKLE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 e1 “Dry conditions had a negative impact on productivity, leading to shedding of the ovary, a decrease in the weight of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The root dry - weight decrease was greater in Inpara 5 than Mahsuri.
Outcomeroot and shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of root and shoot dry weight in Inpara 5 was higher than that of Mahsuri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1088 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The shoot dry - weight decrease was greater in Inpara 5 than Mahsuri.
Outcomeroot and shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of root and shoot dry weight in Inpara 5 was higher than that of Mahsuri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1088 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype G-5 showed the biggest decrease in shoot and root dry weight under water-deficit stress.
Outcomeshoot dry weight and root dry weight e2 Directionbiggest decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Drought Tolerance in Mung Bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 e2 “G-3 showed the smallest decrease in shoot dry weight and root dry weight under WD stress, whereas G-5 showed the biggest decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1534 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Zucchini plants were more sensitive to Ni than Cd, with greater phenotypic effects and dry weight decrease .
Outcometotal dry weight e0 Qualifierhigher phenotypic affection e0 Verbatim
e0 “higher sensitivity of zucchini plants to Ni in comparison to Cd, with a higher phenotypic affection and a major decrease of total dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–912 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in radiation reduced root dry weight by 0.1938 g m−2.
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “for every 1‐MJ m −2 decrease in solar radiation, the root dry weight , shoot dry weight , and root/shoot ratio decrease d by 0.1938 g m −2 , 1.3517 g m −2 , and 0.0103 × 10 −2 , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1067 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in radiation reduced shoot dry weight by 1.3517 g m−2.
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “for every 1‐MJ m −2 decrease in solar radiation, the root dry weight , shoot dry weight , and root/shoot ratio decrease d by 0.1938 g m −2 , 1.3517 g m −2 , and 0.0103 × 10 −2 , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1067 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.