View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition caused a decrease in relative water content in spring wheat.
mineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
leaf rust e0 pathogen relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
drought-treated e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under water stress, YS-1L had a smaller decrease in leaf relative water content than other wheat species.
Stress treatment e0 much smaller decrease e0 other wheat species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stress treatment caused a much smaller decrease in the leaf RWC and rise in MDA content in YS-1L compared to the other wheat species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1417 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d wheat relative water content by 35.57%.
stressed conditions e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the present study with 92 genotypes, a decrease of 35.57% for relative water content and 23.08% was observed for chlorophyll content in the stressed conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Chamran under I1 had the smallest relative water content decline relative to I4.
drought stress treatment (I1) e0 relative water content e0 lowest decrease e0 control treatment (I4) e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The Chamran cultivar (C1) on drought stress treatment (I1) had the lowest decrease in relative water content and total chlorophyll content than with control treatment (I4). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1352 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
leaf rust e0 pathogen relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root in oculation significantly decrease d wheat relative leaf water content .
Root inoculation e0 Helminthosporium sativum t0 pathogen relative leaf water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Root in oculation showed significant decrease in relative leaf water content , whereas root length and root to shoot ratio were also reduced significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–810 t0 “Helminthosporium sativum in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–120 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In compatible in fection, leaf diffusive resistance, relative water content and turgor potential decrease d during symptom progression.
Stripe Rust t0 pathogen leaf diffusive resistance (LDR), relative water content (RWC) and Ψ p e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease of leaf diffusive resistance (LDR), relative water content (RWC) and Ψ p from the appearance of rust symptom to the formation of fungal uredia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–835 t0 “Wheat Leaves in the In fection Process of Stripe Rust ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–82 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat embryo water content decrease d from days 22 to 32 after pollination.
embryo relative water content (ERWC) e0 from the 22nd to the 32nd day e0 Verbatim
e0 “from the 22nd to the 32nd day, the embryos of wheat grains underwent dehydration, as judged by the decrease of embryo relative water content (ERWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–607 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivume0