View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bean weevil and parasitoid performance were not correlated.
parasitoid e0 biocontrol_agent beetle and parasitoid performance e0 not correlated e0 Verbatim
t0 “wild common bean populations, Phaseolus vulgaris L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–334 e0 “beetle and parasitoid performance were not correlated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1015 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Aphid and parasitoid performance were uncorrelated.
aphid and parasitoid performance e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “aphid and parasitoid performance was not correlated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–814 e1 “the aphid Myzus persicae and its endoparasitoid Diaeretiella rapae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–222 e2 “Brassica napus
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–256 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Caterpillar and parasitoid performance was consistent among host plants.
caterpillar e0 pest performance metrics e0 Verbatim
e0 “performance metrics of both the caterpillar and parasitoid were consistent among host plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–997 e1 “three varieties of cultivated Brassica oleracea (L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–686 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid (Cotesia melanoscelus) performance did not vary in relation to CO2 environment (ambient versus elevated).
Cotesia melanoscelus e2 CO[sub 2] environment e0 Parasitoid performance e3 not in relation e0 Verbatim
e0 “not in relation to CO[sub 2] environment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–922 e1 “grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–277 e2 “the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 e3 “Parasitoid performance varied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–843 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Host size of Aulacorthum solani at mummification was not influenced by temperature.
host size at mummification e1 no_change inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “Performance of the parasitoid Praon volucre in Aulacorthum solani at five temperatures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 e0 “a leaf disc of lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–482 e1 “Even though host size at mummification was not influenced by temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1272 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Emergence rate of Praon volucre was not affected by temperature and was between 79.6% and 93.4%.
no_change inferred e3 Verbatim
t0 “Performance of the parasitoid Praon volucre in Aulacorthum solani at five temperatures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 e0 “a leaf disc of lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–482 e3 “Emergence rate was not affected by temperature and was between 79.6% and 93.4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–829 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field parasitoid performance did not differ statistically between sole and intercropped plots.
intercropped plot e0 parasitoid performance e0 no statistical difference e0 field experiment e0 Verbatim
e0 “In the field experiment using sentinel egg card technique no statistical difference in parasitoid performance between the sole crop and intercropped plot was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–711 t0 “brinjal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Other A. rhopalosiphi performance measures showed no further effects.
adult longevity, adult body weight and secondary sex ratio e0 No further effects e0 Verbatim
e0 “No further effects were observed in other variables evaluating A. rhopalosiphi performance , such as adult longevity, adult body weight and secondary sex ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1015 t0 “wheat and oat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
E. plagiator performance did not differ significantly among cultivars or cereal species.
variables analysed e0 did not show significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “E. plagiator did not show significant differences in any of the variables analysed, both between cultivars and cereal species
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1157 t0 “wheat and oat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid (Cotesia melanoscelus) performance did not vary in relation to CO2 environment (ambient versus elevated).
Cotesia melanoscelus e2 CO[sub 2] environment e0 Parasitoid performance e3 not in relation e0 Verbatim
e0 “not in relation to CO[sub 2] environment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–922 e1 “grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–277 e2 “the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 e3 “Parasitoid performance varied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–843 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid development time was unaffected under high CO2.
development time e0 Verbatim
e0 “development time and adult male size were unaffected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1295 e1 “Larvae feeding on high CO 2 aspen exhibited the largest reduction in performance , relative to larvae feeding on birch, oak, or maple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–820 t0 “CO 2 ‐mediated changes in tree chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–100 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adult male parasitoid size was unaffected under high CO2.
development time and adult male size were unaffected e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “development time and adult male size were unaffected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1295 t0 “CO 2 ‐mediated changes in tree chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–100 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bean weevil and parasitoid performance were not correlated.
parasitoid e0 biocontrol_agent beetle and parasitoid performance e0 not correlated e0 Verbatim
t0 “wild common bean populations, Phaseolus vulgaris L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–334 e0 “beetle and parasitoid performance were not correlated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1015 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid residence time did not differ significantly among treatments.
residence time of the parasitoid e0 No significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “No significant differences in the residence time of the parasitoid in the aphid colony occurred between treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1374 e1 “Johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 e2 “Lysiphlebus testaceipes
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–235 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Phaseolus vulgaris_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Myzus persicae
Diaeretiella rapae
Brassica oleracea
Lactuca sativa
Aulacorthum solani
Solanum melongena
Triticum aestivum
Aphidius rhopalosiphi.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Sorghum halepense