View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem relative water content did not decrease significantly during the day.
relative water content (RWC) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “stem relative water content (RWC) and stem hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) of this bamboo species did not decrease significantly during the day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–503 t0 “Sinarundinaria nitida (Mitford) Nakai
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–283 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d slightly without significant differences.
Leaf relative water content e0 overall decrease in relative water content was small e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content and SPAD values also decrease d, but the overall decrease in relative water content was small, and the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1002 t0 “Cd Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–90 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In oculation prevented significant loss of leaf relative water content under simulated stress.
inoculated plants e0 relative water content of leaves e0 neither a significant decrease e0 uninoculated ones e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “neither a significant decrease in the relative water content of leaves nor a strong in hibition of acetylene reduction was observed for in oculated plants compared to the uninoculated ones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–806 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem relative water content did not decrease significantly during the day.
relative water content (RWC) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “stem relative water content (RWC) and stem hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) of this bamboo species did not decrease significantly during the day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–503 t0 “Sinarundinaria nitida (Mitford) Nakai
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–283 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
None of the tested maple species showed a significant decline in leaf relative water content under drought.
one month long summer drought e1 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “none from tested species showed a significant decrease in leaf relative water content in dicating stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–738 t0 “maples (Acer sp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–67 e1 “reactions of juvenile plants of eight maple species to one month long summer drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–511 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem hydraulic conductivity did not decrease significantly during the day.
hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “stem relative water content (RWC) and stem hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) of this bamboo species did not decrease significantly during the day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–503 t0 “Sinarundinaria nitida (Mitford) Nakai
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–283 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In fection by Albugo Candida caused a nonsignificant decrease of relative water content in Cakile maritima .
relative water content e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Puccinia lagenophorae , in fecting Senecio glaucus and Albugo Candida in fecting Cakile maritima during late in fection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–452 e1 “The in fection of Senecio caused a significant decrease of relative water content , while the in fection of Cakile caused a nonsignificant decrease of the same parameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–770 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In oculation prevented significant loss of leaf relative water content under simulated stress.
inoculated plants e0 relative water content of leaves e0 neither a significant decrease e0 uninoculated ones e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “neither a significant decrease in the relative water content of leaves nor a strong in hibition of acetylene reduction was observed for in oculated plants compared to the uninoculated ones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–806 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Agar and Gelrite caused no considerable changes in morpho-physiological characteristics of walnut explants.
Agar or Gelrite e2 morpho-physiological characteristics e2 no considerable changes e2 Verbatim
e2 “Analysis of results in dicated no considerable changes in the morpho-physiological characteristics of explants grown in DKW medium containing Agar or Gelrite gelling agents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1194 e0 “Compared with the medium containing Agar, adding Gelrite to the DKW medium caused a decrease in E and an in crease in relative leaf water content (RWC) of the walnut explant's leaves during desiccation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1396 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Fargesia nitidat0
Zea mays
Acer.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Cakile maritima
Albugo candida