View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype ICC15868.
Outcomerelative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype GL26054.
Outcomerelative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype L552.
Outcomerelative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content declined.
Outcomerelative Water contents RWC e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease of BIO, SW, TKW, relative Water content s RWC, LA, PH and DH. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1065 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Oil effects in cluded reduced chlorophyll and relative water content and electrolyte leakage.
Outcomechlorophyll and relative water content, electrolyte leakage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in chlorophyll and relative water content , electrolyte leakage and high levels of MDA and proline were in dicators of the oxidative effects of EOs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1698 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content in creased under stress.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “The findings demonstrated a consistent in crease in relative water content , accompanied by a decrease in water loss and transpiration. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1286 t0 “Bambara Groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–92 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition caused a decrease in relative water content in spring wheat.
Treatmentmineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stress decrease d relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “CUCUMBER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–91 e0 “Generally a decrease in relative water content and an in crease in dry weight content were recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–499 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea relative water content alternately decrease d and in creased during stress.
OutcomeRelative water content e0 Directionalternate decrease or increase e0 Verbatim
e0 “Relative water content (RWC) showed periodic changes with alternate decrease or in crease at certain in terval ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–480 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–113 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat leaf water content decrease d in winter relative to summer.
Outcomeleaf water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–332 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Roots lost turgor at lower relative water content than leaves.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Roots exhibited turgor loss at lower values of relative water content and experienced a more gradual decrease in water potential per unit water content during dehydration than did leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1193 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in RWC and LWP was larger in C. olitorius than in C. capsularis .
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) and leaf water potential (LWP) e1 ComparatorCorchorus capsularis L.e1 Verbatim
e1 “decrease d the relative water content (RWC) and leaf water potential (LWP) in the two jute species Corchorus capsularis L. (cv. JRC 212) and C. olitorius L. (cv. JRO 632), more so in the latter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–265 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Midwinter relative water content fell by 8% in the wet treatment.
Qualifierduring midwinter e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in RWC during midwinter was only 8% and 12%, respectively, in the 2 treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–864 e1 “wet and dry treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–742 e2 “rose (Rosa hyb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–155 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Midwinter relative water content fell by 12% in the dry treatment.
Qualifierduring midwinter e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in RWC during midwinter was only 8% and 12%, respectively, in the 2 treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–864 e1 “wet and dry treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–742 e2 “rose (Rosa hyb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–155 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Before visible wilt, in fected leaves showed no changes in relative water content , permeability, RNA, or protein.
Outcomerelative water content, tissue permeability, RNA, and protein levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “No changes in relative water content , tissue permeability, RNA, and protein levels and only a slight decrease in chlorophyll level were detected within in fected leaf tissue before the appearance of visible wilt. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–528 t0 “chrysanthemum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34 e1 “Verticillium dahliae Kleb. in vaded and colonized chrysanthemum leaf tissue before symptom expression. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–205 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Control pear leaf water potential and relative water content at turgor loss tended to decline from spring to summer.
OutcomeLeaf water potential (Psi(pi) (0)) and relative water content (R(0)) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf water potential (Psi(pi) (0)) and relative water content (R(0)) at the turgor loss point of control leaves tended to decrease from spring to summer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1022 e1 “pear trees (Pyrus communis L. cv. "Barlett") ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–125 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water content relative to dry mass or organic matter began to decline during the late embryonal phase.
Organ / stagelate embryonal phase e1 Verbatim
e0 “Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–324 e1 “Related to dry mass or organic matter (i.e. dry mass corrected for the mass of in organic ions) water content started to decrease during the late embryonal phase of the life cycle. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–729 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Armeria had a smaller ascorbate decrease than Cochlearia.
Directionsmaller decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Armeria maritima showed similar decrease s in relative water content and dry weight after droughting, but a quantitatively smaller decrease in ascorbate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–739 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.