View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “soybean” → Glycine max . Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low nitrogen during low temperature caused little decrease in pod number versus 23°C.
Treatmentlow N application during the low temperature treatments e0 Comparatorsame comparison e0 Verbatim
e0 “low N application during the low temperature treatments showed little decrease in pod number in the same comparison. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–651 t0 “soybean s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–132 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Humate or oat straw depressed vegetative growth and tended to decrease flower number.
Treatmenthumate, and or oat straw e0 Outcomevegetative growth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Despite the increase in the 100-seed weight, the addition of humate, and or oat straw indicated no increase in the seed weight because of the depression of vegetative growth and the tendency of decrease in the flower number. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3435–3659 t0 “soybean s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–114 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High nitrogen during low temperature markedly decrease d pod number versus 23°C.
TreatmentHigh N application during the low temperature treatments e0 Comparator23°C condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “High N application during the low temperature treatments caused a remark able decrease in pod number, comparing with a 23°C condition. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–517 t0 “soybean s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–132 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean height decrease d as simulated mesotrione drift rate increased.
Treatmentsimulated mesotrione drift e0 Verbatim
e0 “As the rate of simulated mesotrione drift increased, there was an increase in soybean injury and a decrease in shoot dry weight, height, and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–651 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–114 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield decrease d as simulated mesotrione drift rate increased.
Treatmentsimulated mesotrione drift e0 Verbatim
e0 “As the rate of simulated mesotrione drift increased, there was an increase in soybean injury and a decrease in shoot dry weight, height, and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–651 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–114 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean shoot dry weight decrease d as simulated mesotrione drift rate increased.
Treatmentsimulated mesotrione drift e0 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “As the rate of simulated mesotrione drift increased, there was an increase in soybean injury and a decrease in shoot dry weight, height, and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–651 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–114 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Early generation selection did not effectively decrease percent heat injury in Population 1.
OutcomeIneffectiveness of early generation selection for decreased percent heat injury e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ineffectiveness of early generation selection for decrease d percent heat injury was indicated in Population 1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–1995 t0 “SOYBEAN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A typical ozone dose decrease d soybean seed weight by 20% relative to the control dose.
Treatmenta dose of O 3 typical for soybean production areas e0 Comparatora control dose of 0.025 ppm O 3 e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “a dose of O 3 typical for soybean production areas (seasonal 7—h day −1 mean of 0.055 ppm v/v) caused a seed weight decrease of 20% compared to a control dose of 0.025 ppm O 3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–676 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield declined with increasing dicamba rate according to an exponential response equation.
Treatmentincreasing rates of dicamba e0 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Comparatorrate = 0 g ha −1 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Soybean yield in response to increasing rates of dicamba was described by equations of the form y = Aexp ( − bx ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–608 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–25 e1 “Soybean yield in response to increasing rates of dicamba was described by equations of the form y = Aexp ( − bx ), where y = yield, A = maximum yield (rate = 0 g ha −1 ), b is a constant, and x = rate of dicamba applied. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–715 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean aphid injury at seedling stage decrease d plant height.
Treatmentinjury by soybean aphids e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in plant height and number of pods and seeds, owing to injury by soybean aphids at the seedling stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–387 t0 “Soybean Aphid at the Seedling Stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean aphid injury at seedling stage decrease d the number of pods and seeds.
Treatmentinjury by soybean aphids e0 Outcomenumber of pods and seeds e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in plant height and number of pods and seeds, owing to injury by soybean aphids at the seedling stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–387 t0 “Soybean Aphid at the Seedling Stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–87 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ureide N accumulation in aphid-injured soybean decrease d by about 36%.
Treatmentaphid‐injured plants e4 Outcomeureide N accumulation e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “soybean aphid ( Aphis glycines Matsumura) effects on soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–73 e4 “This lack of a concentration effect resulted in about a 36% decrease in ureide N accumulation in aphid‐injured plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1264 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide injury and defoliation interacted to decrease soybean yield.
Treatmentherbicide injury and defoliation e3 Qualifierinteracted over 1990 and 1991 e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “seed yield of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–572 e3 “Moreover, herbicide injury and defoliation interacted over 1990 and 1991 to decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1297 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold stress decrease d activities of both soybean lipoxygenase isoenzymes.
Outcomespecific activities of both isoenzymes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cold stress led to a decrease of the specific activities of both isoenzymes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–233 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation caused a significant yield loss in both moisture-stressed and well-watered soybean s.
Directiondecrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Significant yield loss occurred in both moisture-stressed and well-watered soybean s due to defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2265–2367 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The same combination synergistically decrease d dry biomass and height.
Outcomedry biomass and height e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a synergistic decrease in dry biomass and height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1132 t0 “soybean injury ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High cutting, crushing, harvest injury and processing violations contribute to crop losses and lower grain and seed quality.
Treatmenta high cut of the harvester's header e0 Outcomelosses and a decrease in the quality of commercial grain and seeds e0 Verbatim
e0 “a high cut of the harvester's header, significant crushing and injury during harvesting, and violation of the post-harvest processing technology lead to losses and a decrease in the quality of commercial grain and seeds. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–318 t0 “soybean s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–75 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A dicamba rate of 98 g a.i. per ha at the V6 stage caused significant soybean yield loss.
Organ / stageV6 growth stage e2 Treatmentdicamba rate of 98 g.ai ha -1 e2 Directiondecrease inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “dicamba-susceptible soybean s during different growth stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–899 e2 “significant yield loss occurred during the V6 growth stage at a dicamba rate of 98 g.ai ha -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1645 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher insecticide rates may decrease soybean yield.
Treatmenthigher rates of application e0 Qualifiermay cause foliage injury e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 e0 “higher rates of application may cause foliage injury to the extent of decreasing yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–260 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.