View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Prediction errors matched the magnitude of calculated probable errors .
OutcomePrediction errors e0 Directionsame magnitude e0 Comparatorcalculated probable errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Prediction errors were of the same magnitude as the calculated probable errors . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1041 e1 “living tobacco plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–600 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation prediction errors were similar to fitting errors .
Outcomeroot mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) e0 Comparatorfitting errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1084 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation errors were similar to errors from independent data.
Comparatorindependent data e0 Verbatim
e0 “These errors were similar to those computed using independent data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1342 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional errors were found, including errors affecting reported data and manuscript typographical errors .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “we found several others, some of which affect reported data and some of which are simple typographical errors introduced while preparing a manuscript ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1097 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Observed error variance standard errors exceeded expected standard errors in both designs.
OutcomeObserved standard errors of the experimental error variances e0 Comparator“expected standard errors” e0 Verbatim
e0 “Observed standard errors of the experimental error variances were larger than “expected standard errors ” for both Designs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1055 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Errors resulting from uneven grazing are compared with errors due to transference of fertility.
Outcomeerrors due to transference of fertility e0 Verbatim
e0 “a comparison is made with errors due to transference of fertility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–368 e1 “white clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–95 Other claims from this paper (2) Association author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The dependency of errors on the response variable of interest can increase the probability of errors .
Treatmentdependency of errors on the response variable of interest e0 Outcomeprobability of errors e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The dependency of errors on the response variable of interest can influence the effect size and increase the probability of errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2223 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated leaf area index errors were associated with daily simulated ET errors , varying by growth stage.
Organ / stagegrowth stage e0 Outcomeerrors in daily simulated ET e0 QualifierErrors in simulated leaf area index e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Errors in simulated leaf area index were associated with errors in daily simulated ET, but the relationship varied with the growth stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1807 t0 “Wheat crop models ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
All errors increased with lower resolution.
Treatmentlower resolution e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “All errors increased with lower resolution ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1787 Other claims from this paper (15) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The author argues this integration would reduce taxonomic errors .
Outcomeminimize errors and modify taxonomy e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Such an effort would minimize errors and modify taxonomy. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–259 Other claims from this paper (1) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A procedure aimed at reducing errors in the preparation of cocoa leaf samples is recommended.
TreatmentA procedure aimed at reducing such errors e1 Outcomereducing such errors e1 Verbatim
e0 “Errors arising from the preparative phase of storing the fresh harvested cocoa leaves during transit to the laboratory ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–127 e1 “A procedure aimed at reducing such errors is recommended ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–281 Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Including gm when calculating photosynthesis parameters from gas-exchange data is recommended to avoid systematic errors .
Outcomesystematic errors e7 Verbatim
e0 “especially in plants with high photosynthetic capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–910 e7 “will avoid systematic errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1229 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Interplant spacing errors in corn were mainly due to crop damage and sampling platform vibration that caused mosaicking errors .
OutcomeInterplant spacing errors e1 Qualifiercrop damage and sampling platform vibration e1 Verbatim
e1 “Interplant spacing errors were mainly due to crop damage and sampling platform vibration that caused mosaicking errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1067 t0 “Emerged Corn Plant Spacing Measurement ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–102 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Some changes were attributed to freezing dehydration errors .
Qualifiererrors in the freezing dehydration e0 Verbatim
e0 “Some of the changes are attributed to errors in the freezing dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–449 t0 “Citrus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Polyploid types were attributed to cytological errors in diploids.
Qualifiercytological errors in diploids e0 Verbatim
e0 “polyploid types originated from cytological errors in diploids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–604 t0 “Pennisetum typhoides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–87 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
MAP2 corrected in vitro folding errors in taxol-stabilized maize microtubules.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “MAP2 corrected in vitro folding errors in taxol-stabilized maize microtubules ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1035 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding environments gave the greatest reduction in genotype standard errors .
Treatmentadditional environments e0 Outcomegenotype standard errors e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest reduction in genotype standard errors was obtained through additional environments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1193 e1 “wheat crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–161 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Controlled lighting significantly reduced sorting errors .
Treatmentcontrolled lighting system e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A controlled lighting system was implemented to optimize the quality of the captured images, which allowed for a significant reduction in sorting errors . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1023 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.