Search claims · PlantClaims

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 23.19%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 7.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling rate (AGFR)e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 13.97%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants 19

Show all 19 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The transformants showed a small decrease in phosphoribulokinase activity and larger but subproportional decreases in sedoheptulose-1,7-biphosphatase and plastid fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activity.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment: Antisense expression of a full length cDNA encoding plastid aldolasee0
Gene: sedoheptulose-1,7-biphosphatase and plastid fructose-1,6-bisphosphatasee4
Outcome: phosphoribulokinase activitye4
Direction: decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Antisense expression of a full length cDNA encoding plastid aldolase led to decreased expression of aldolase at the transcript and protein level in several 'antisense' potato transformants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188

e4
“a small decrease of phosphoribulokinase activity, and larger but subproportional decreases of sedoheptulose-1,7-biphosphatase and plastid fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–745

Title

A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants

Volker Haake; Rita Zrenner; Uwe Sonnewald; et al. The Plant Journal 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00089.x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Antisense expression of plastid aldolase decreased aldolase expression at the transcript and protein level in several potato transformants.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 32-43% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 56-71% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 79-83% in transformant A-51.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 91-97% in transformant A-2.
Mechanism Q-Sepharose separation showed that the decrease in aldolase activity was due to inhibition of plastid aldolase.
Intervention effect The transformants showed a small increase in Rubisco activity.
Intervention effect The transformants contained increased triose phosphates.
Intervention effect The transformants contained very low ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate and glycerate-3-phosphate.
Intervention effect Thylakoid energization was increased in the transformants, with photosystem II more reduced.
Intervention effect Starch synthesis was decreased by 16% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Starch synthesis was decreased by 36% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Sucrose synthesis was less strongly inhibited than starch synthesis in the transformants.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 10% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 40% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 66% in transformant A-51.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 85% in transformant A-2.
Intervention effect Plant growth was not significantly altered in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Plant growth was decreased by 41% in transformant A-3 and was severely inhibited in plants with under 20% of wild-type aldolase activity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The transformants showed a small increase in Rubisco activity.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment: Antisense expression of a full length cDNA encoding plastid aldolasee0
Outcome: Rubisco activitye3
Direction: increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Antisense expression of a full length cDNA encoding plastid aldolase led to decreased expression of aldolase at the transcript and protein level in several 'antisense' potato transformants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188

e3
“The transformants showed a small increase of Rubisco activity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–569

Title

A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants

Volker Haake; Rita Zrenner; Uwe Sonnewald; et al. The Plant Journal 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00089.x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Antisense expression of plastid aldolase decreased aldolase expression at the transcript and protein level in several potato transformants.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 32-43% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 56-71% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 79-83% in transformant A-51.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 91-97% in transformant A-2.
Mechanism Q-Sepharose separation showed that the decrease in aldolase activity was due to inhibition of plastid aldolase.
Intervention effect The transformants showed a small decrease in phosphoribulokinase activity and larger but subproportional decreases in sedoheptulose-1,7-biphosphatase and plastid fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activity.
Intervention effect The transformants contained increased triose phosphates.
Intervention effect The transformants contained very low ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate and glycerate-3-phosphate.
Intervention effect Thylakoid energization was increased in the transformants, with photosystem II more reduced.
Intervention effect Starch synthesis was decreased by 16% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Starch synthesis was decreased by 36% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Sucrose synthesis was less strongly inhibited than starch synthesis in the transformants.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 10% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 40% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 66% in transformant A-51.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 85% in transformant A-2.
Intervention effect Plant growth was not significantly altered in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Plant growth was decreased by 41% in transformant A-3 and was severely inhibited in plants with under 20% of wild-type aldolase activity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The transformants contained increased triose phosphates.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment: Antisense expression of a full length cDNA encoding plastid aldolasee0
Outcome: triose phosphatese5
Direction: increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Antisense expression of a full length cDNA encoding plastid aldolase led to decreased expression of aldolase at the transcript and protein level in several 'antisense' potato transformants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188

e5
“The transformants contained increased triose phosphates”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–892

Title

A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants

Volker Haake; Rita Zrenner; Uwe Sonnewald; et al. The Plant Journal 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00089.x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Antisense expression of plastid aldolase decreased aldolase expression at the transcript and protein level in several potato transformants.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 32-43% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 56-71% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 79-83% in transformant A-51.
Intervention effect Aldolase activity was decreased by 91-97% in transformant A-2.
Mechanism Q-Sepharose separation showed that the decrease in aldolase activity was due to inhibition of plastid aldolase.
Intervention effect The transformants showed a small increase in Rubisco activity.
Intervention effect The transformants showed a small decrease in phosphoribulokinase activity and larger but subproportional decreases in sedoheptulose-1,7-biphosphatase and plastid fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase activity.
Intervention effect The transformants contained very low ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate and glycerate-3-phosphate.
Intervention effect Thylakoid energization was increased in the transformants, with photosystem II more reduced.
Intervention effect Starch synthesis was decreased by 16% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Starch synthesis was decreased by 36% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Sucrose synthesis was less strongly inhibited than starch synthesis in the transformants.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 10% in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 40% in transformant A-3.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 66% in transformant A-51.
Intervention effect Ambient photosynthesis was inhibited by 85% in transformant A-2.
Intervention effect Plant growth was not significantly altered in transformant A-70.
Intervention effect Plant growth was decreased by 41% in transformant A-3 and was severely inhibited in plants with under 20% of wild-type aldolase activity.

Morphogenesis, pigment content, phytohormones and productivity of sweet pepper under the action of gibberellin and tebuconazole 19

Show all 19 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EW-250 decreased epidermal thickness.

Taxon: Capsicum annuum L.Capsicum annuume1
Treatment: EW-250e0
Outcome: thickness of the upper and lower epidermise5
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“EW-250 led, on the contrary, to a decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2048

t0
“sweet pepper”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78

e1
“productivity of Capsicum annuum L., Antey variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–606

e2
“Both regulators led to an increase in the number of leaves on the plant, the leaf raw biomass, stems and roots and the dry matter of the whole plant, the area of a single leaf blade and the total area of leaves on the plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1668

e3
“With GA3 treatment, plant height increased considerably, while with EW-250, it decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1443

e4
“Under the action of EW-250, the chlorophyll content in the leaves surged, while under the action of GA3 it tended to decrease or did not change at all”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1820

e5
“GA3 treatment induced a rise in the thickness of the upper and lower epidermis, and EW-250 led, on the contrary, to a decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2048

e6
“It is shown that after treatment with exogenous GA3, the content of endogenous IAA and ABA decreased and GA3 in plant stems increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2183

e7
“Under the action of the retardant, the level of ABA in the leaves did not change, while GA3 and IAA decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2366–2475

Title

Morphogenesis, pigment content, phytohormones and productivity of sweet pepper under the action of gibberellin and tebuconazole

V. V. Rogach; V. G. Kuryata; I. V. Kosakivska; et al. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems 2021. doi:10.15421/022139

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect GA3 increased plant height.
Intervention effect EW-250 decreased plant height.
Intervention effect Both regulators increased leaf number and biomass.
Intervention effect Both regulators increased stem, root and whole plant dry matter.
Intervention effect Both regulators expanded single leaf and total leaf area.
Intervention effect EW-250 increased leaf chlorophyll.
Intervention effect GA3 tended to lower or leave unchanged leaf chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Both regulators thickened chlorenchyma and enlarged columnar parenchyma cells.
Intervention effect GA3 thickened both epidermal surfaces.
Intervention effect GA3 decreased stem IAA and ABA.
Intervention effect GA3 increased endogenous stem GA3.
Intervention effect EW-250 reduced stem GA3, IAA and ABA.
Intervention effect GA3 raised leaf GA3 and IAA.
Intervention effect GA3 inhibited leaf ABA.
Intervention effect EW-250 left leaf ABA unchanged.
Intervention effect EW-250 lowered leaf GA3 and IAA.
Intervention effect Both regulators reduced stem cytokinin pools.
Intervention effect EW-250 increased leaf hormone content, specifically iP.
Observation GA3 increased leaf ZG, Z and ZR and fruit number; EW-250 increased fruit weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both regulators reduced stem cytokinin pools.

Taxon: Capsicum annuum L.Capsicum annuume1
Treatment: studied growth regulatorse0
Outcome: pool of cytokinins (CK) in stemse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Treatment of plants with the studied growth regulators caused a decrease in the pool of cytokinins (CK) in stems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2589

t0
“sweet pepper”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78

e1
“productivity of Capsicum annuum L., Antey variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–606

e2
“Both regulators led to an increase in the number of leaves on the plant, the leaf raw biomass, stems and roots and the dry matter of the whole plant, the area of a single leaf blade and the total area of leaves on the plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1668

e3
“With GA3 treatment, plant height increased considerably, while with EW-250, it decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1443

e4
“Under the action of EW-250, the chlorophyll content in the leaves surged, while under the action of GA3 it tended to decrease or did not change at all”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1820

e5
“GA3 treatment induced a rise in the thickness of the upper and lower epidermis, and EW-250 led, on the contrary, to a decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2048

e6
“It is shown that after treatment with exogenous GA3, the content of endogenous IAA and ABA decreased and GA3 in plant stems increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2183

e7
“Under the action of the retardant, the level of ABA in the leaves did not change, while GA3 and IAA decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2366–2475

Title

Morphogenesis, pigment content, phytohormones and productivity of sweet pepper under the action of gibberellin and tebuconazole

V. V. Rogach; V. G. Kuryata; I. V. Kosakivska; et al. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems 2021. doi:10.15421/022139

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect GA3 increased plant height.
Intervention effect EW-250 decreased plant height.
Intervention effect Both regulators increased leaf number and biomass.
Intervention effect Both regulators increased stem, root and whole plant dry matter.
Intervention effect Both regulators expanded single leaf and total leaf area.
Intervention effect EW-250 increased leaf chlorophyll.
Intervention effect GA3 tended to lower or leave unchanged leaf chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Both regulators thickened chlorenchyma and enlarged columnar parenchyma cells.
Intervention effect GA3 thickened both epidermal surfaces.
Intervention effect EW-250 decreased epidermal thickness.
Intervention effect GA3 decreased stem IAA and ABA.
Intervention effect GA3 increased endogenous stem GA3.
Intervention effect EW-250 reduced stem GA3, IAA and ABA.
Intervention effect GA3 raised leaf GA3 and IAA.
Intervention effect GA3 inhibited leaf ABA.
Intervention effect EW-250 left leaf ABA unchanged.
Intervention effect EW-250 lowered leaf GA3 and IAA.
Intervention effect EW-250 increased leaf hormone content, specifically iP.
Observation GA3 increased leaf ZG, Z and ZR and fruit number; EW-250 increased fruit weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EW-250 reduced stem GA3, IAA and ABA.

Taxon: Capsicum annuum L.Capsicum annuume1
Treatment: EW-250e0
Outcome: levels of GA3, IAA and ABA in the stemse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“EW-250 caused a decrease in the levels of GA3, IAA and ABA in the stems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2194–2265

t0
“sweet pepper”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78

e1
“productivity of Capsicum annuum L., Antey variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–606

e2
“Both regulators led to an increase in the number of leaves on the plant, the leaf raw biomass, stems and roots and the dry matter of the whole plant, the area of a single leaf blade and the total area of leaves on the plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1668

e3
“With GA3 treatment, plant height increased considerably, while with EW-250, it decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1443

e4
“Under the action of EW-250, the chlorophyll content in the leaves surged, while under the action of GA3 it tended to decrease or did not change at all”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1820

e5
“GA3 treatment induced a rise in the thickness of the upper and lower epidermis, and EW-250 led, on the contrary, to a decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2048

e6
“It is shown that after treatment with exogenous GA3, the content of endogenous IAA and ABA decreased and GA3 in plant stems increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2183

e7
“Under the action of the retardant, the level of ABA in the leaves did not change, while GA3 and IAA decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2366–2475

Title

Morphogenesis, pigment content, phytohormones and productivity of sweet pepper under the action of gibberellin and tebuconazole

V. V. Rogach; V. G. Kuryata; I. V. Kosakivska; et al. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems 2021. doi:10.15421/022139

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect GA3 increased plant height.
Intervention effect EW-250 decreased plant height.
Intervention effect Both regulators increased leaf number and biomass.
Intervention effect Both regulators increased stem, root and whole plant dry matter.
Intervention effect Both regulators expanded single leaf and total leaf area.
Intervention effect EW-250 increased leaf chlorophyll.
Intervention effect GA3 tended to lower or leave unchanged leaf chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Both regulators thickened chlorenchyma and enlarged columnar parenchyma cells.
Intervention effect GA3 thickened both epidermal surfaces.
Intervention effect EW-250 decreased epidermal thickness.
Intervention effect GA3 decreased stem IAA and ABA.
Intervention effect GA3 increased endogenous stem GA3.
Intervention effect GA3 raised leaf GA3 and IAA.
Intervention effect GA3 inhibited leaf ABA.
Intervention effect EW-250 left leaf ABA unchanged.
Intervention effect EW-250 lowered leaf GA3 and IAA.
Intervention effect Both regulators reduced stem cytokinin pools.
Intervention effect EW-250 increased leaf hormone content, specifically iP.
Observation GA3 increased leaf ZG, Z and ZR and fruit number; EW-250 increased fruit weight.

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimuline0
Outcome: number of weedse0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: PGR Zeastimuline4
Outcome: above-ground air-dry mass of weed plantse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“only a slight decrease in the above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1848

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Laudis herbicidee0
Interactor: weedse0weed
Outcome: number of weedse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 89,7%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“After treatment of crops with Laudis herbicide, weed accounting showed a decrease in the number of weeds by 89,7% compared to control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1165

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced leaf starch.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSe1
Outcome: starch content in leavese0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“leading to a reduced starch content in leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–974

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: eTe1
Outcome: starch, CP and digestibilitye0
Direction: reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reducing starch, CP and digestibility”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1340

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined warming and water deficit reduced forage quality.

Taxon: Panicum maximum Jacq.Megathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment: wSeT treatmente0
Outcome: forage qualitye0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The combined wSeT treatment reduced A , g s , V cmax and the forage quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1417

e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–1536

Title

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass

Eduardo Habermann; Eduardo Augusto Dias de Oliveira; Daniele Ribeiro Contin; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2018. doi:10.1111/ppl.12891

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Water deficit and warming had no effect on photosystem II photochemistry.
Intervention effect Water deficit at ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf starch.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced leaf dry mass by 16%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased forage fiber.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced crude protein.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased dry matter digestibility.
Intervention effect Warming with adequate moisture increased leaf dry mass by 25%.
Intervention effect Warming increased lignin content.
Intervention effect Warming reduced starch, crude protein and digestibility.
Intervention effect Combined warming and water deficit reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and Rubisco carboxylation.
Intervention effect Water deficit raised leaf lignin by 43% versus control.
Intervention effect Warming raised leaf lignin by 28% versus control.
Intervention effect Combined warming and deficit raised leaf lignin by 17% versus control.
Mechanism Raised lignin caused a significant reduction in dry matter digestibility.

Ameliorative Effects of Exogenous Potassium Nitrate on Antioxidant Defense System and Mineral Nutrient Uptake in Radish (Raphanus sativusL.) under Salinity Stress 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

40 day radish chlorophyll-a decreased by 50% under salinity stress

Taxon: Raphanus sativusL.Raphanus sativust0
Material: 40 day radishe0
Treatment: salinity stresse0
Outcome: chlorophyll-ae0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 50e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results from the present study illustrated that the salinity stress induced a significant decrease in shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight, root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, leaf area chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate by 43, 67, 41, 21, 34, 28, 74, 91, 50, 41, 24, 34…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–1076

t0
“Raphanus sativusL.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–139

Title

Ameliorative Effects of Exogenous Potassium Nitrate on Antioxidant Defense System and Mineral Nutrient Uptake in Radish (Raphanus sativusL.) under Salinity Stress

Amany H. A. Abeed; Muhammad Hamzah Saleem; Muhammad Ahsan Asghar; et al. ACS Omega 2023. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01039

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot length decreased by 43% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root length decreased by 67% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot fresh weight decreased by 41% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot dry weight decreased by 21% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root fresh weight decreased by 34% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root dry weight decreased by 28% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish number of leaves per plant decreased by 74% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish leaf area decreased by 91% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish chlorophyll-b decreased by 41% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish total chlorophyll decreased by 24% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish carotenoid decreased by 34% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish net photosynthesis decreased by 14% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish stomatal conductance decreased by 26% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish transpiration rate decreased by 67% under salinity stress
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased phenolic content in 40 day radish by 41%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased flavonoids content in 40 day radish by 43%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased ascorbic acid content in 40 day radish by 24%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased anthocyanin content in 40 day radish by 37%
Mechanism KNO 3 improved growth and nutritional profile of both radish genotypes under normal and stressed conditions

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

40 day radish carotenoid decreased by 34% under salinity stress

Taxon: Raphanus sativusL.Raphanus sativust0
Material: 40 day radishe0
Treatment: salinity stresse0
Outcome: carotenoide0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 34e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results from the present study illustrated that the salinity stress induced a significant decrease in shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight, root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, leaf area chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate by 43, 67, 41, 21, 34, 28, 74, 91, 50, 41, 24, 34…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–1076

t0
“Raphanus sativusL.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–139

Title

Ameliorative Effects of Exogenous Potassium Nitrate on Antioxidant Defense System and Mineral Nutrient Uptake in Radish (Raphanus sativusL.) under Salinity Stress

Amany H. A. Abeed; Muhammad Hamzah Saleem; Muhammad Ahsan Asghar; et al. ACS Omega 2023. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01039

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot length decreased by 43% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root length decreased by 67% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot fresh weight decreased by 41% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot dry weight decreased by 21% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root fresh weight decreased by 34% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root dry weight decreased by 28% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish number of leaves per plant decreased by 74% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish leaf area decreased by 91% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish chlorophyll-a decreased by 50% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish chlorophyll-b decreased by 41% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish total chlorophyll decreased by 24% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish net photosynthesis decreased by 14% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish stomatal conductance decreased by 26% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish transpiration rate decreased by 67% under salinity stress
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased phenolic content in 40 day radish by 41%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased flavonoids content in 40 day radish by 43%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased ascorbic acid content in 40 day radish by 24%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased anthocyanin content in 40 day radish by 37%
Mechanism KNO 3 improved growth and nutritional profile of both radish genotypes under normal and stressed conditions

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

40 day radish shoot length decreased by 43% under salinity stress

Taxon: Raphanus sativusL.Raphanus sativust0
Material: 40 day radishe0
Treatment: salinity stresse0
Outcome: shoot lengthe0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 43e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results from the present study illustrated that the salinity stress induced a significant decrease in shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight, root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, leaf area chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate by 43, 67, 41, 21, 34, 28, 74, 91, 50, 41, 24, 34…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–1076

t0
“Raphanus sativusL.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–139

Title

Ameliorative Effects of Exogenous Potassium Nitrate on Antioxidant Defense System and Mineral Nutrient Uptake in Radish (Raphanus sativusL.) under Salinity Stress

Amany H. A. Abeed; Muhammad Hamzah Saleem; Muhammad Ahsan Asghar; et al. ACS Omega 2023. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01039

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect 40 day radish root length decreased by 67% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot fresh weight decreased by 41% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish shoot dry weight decreased by 21% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root fresh weight decreased by 34% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish root dry weight decreased by 28% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish number of leaves per plant decreased by 74% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish leaf area decreased by 91% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish chlorophyll-a decreased by 50% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish chlorophyll-b decreased by 41% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish total chlorophyll decreased by 24% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish carotenoid decreased by 34% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish net photosynthesis decreased by 14% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish stomatal conductance decreased by 26% under salinity stress
Intervention effect 40 day radish transpiration rate decreased by 67% under salinity stress
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased phenolic content in 40 day radish by 41%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased flavonoids content in 40 day radish by 43%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased ascorbic acid content in 40 day radish by 24%
Intervention effect Exogenous KNO 3 increased anthocyanin content in 40 day radish by 37%
Mechanism KNO 3 improved growth and nutritional profile of both radish genotypes under normal and stressed conditions

The optimization of grain crops’ phytosanitary condition with the associative rhizobacteria application 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximal decrease in helminthosporiotic root rot development (32 %) in soft wheat and triticale was noted with Sphingomonas sp. K1B.

Taxon: soft wheate6
Treatment: Sphingomonas sp. K1Be6
Outcome: helminthosporiotic root rote6
Direction: maximal decreasee6
Value: 32 %e6
Comparator: water and Batr Gume3

Verbatim

e3
“In the control plants were treated with water and Batr Gum (by 10 ml/l of water)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–578

e6
“On the soft wheat cultivar Sudarynya and triticale cultivars Aist Kharkovskiy and Dua, a decrease in helminthosporiotic root rot was revealed when using associative rhizobacteria; the maximal decrease in the disease development (by 32 %) was noted when using the strain Sphingomonas sp. K1B”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–2040

Title

The optimization of grain crops’ phytosanitary condition with the associative rhizobacteria application

L. E Kolesnikov; A. A Belimov; B. A Hassan; et al. Rossiiskaia selskokhoziaistvennaia nauka 2023. doi:10.31857/s2500262723010088

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingomonas sp. K1B decreased the affection of the Dua, k-828 triticale cultivar by brown rust by 13 %.

Taxon: triticale×Triticosecalee6
Material: Dua, k-828e5
Treatment: Sphingomonas sp. K1B straine5
Outcome: plants affection by brown ruste5
Direction: decreasee5
Value: 13 %e5
Comparator: water and Batr Gume3

Verbatim

e3
“In the control plants were treated with water and Batr Gum (by 10 ml/l of water)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–578

e5
“After the Dua, k-828 cultivar treatment with the Sphingomonas sp. K1B strain, a decrease in the plants affection by brown rust was observed by 13 %, the pustules number decreased by 59 %, the pustule area by 52 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1448

e6
“On the soft wheat cultivar Sudarynya and triticale cultivars Aist Kharkovskiy and Dua, a decrease in helminthosporiotic root rot was revealed when using associative rhizobacteria; the maximal decrease in the disease development (by 32 %) was noted when using the strain Sphingomonas sp. K1B”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–2040

Title

The optimization of grain crops’ phytosanitary condition with the associative rhizobacteria application

L. E Kolesnikov; A. A Belimov; B. A Hassan; et al. Rossiiskaia selskokhoziaistvennaia nauka 2023. doi:10.31857/s2500262723010088

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingomonas sp. K1B decreased the pustule area of brown rust on the Dua, k-828 triticale cultivar by 52 %.

Taxon: triticale×Triticosecalee6
Material: Dua, k-828e5
Treatment: Sphingomonas sp. K1B straine5
Outcome: pustule areae5
Direction: decreasee5
Value: 52 %e5
Qualifier: brown ruste5
Comparator: water and Batr Gume3

Verbatim

e3
“In the control plants were treated with water and Batr Gum (by 10 ml/l of water)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–578

e5
“After the Dua, k-828 cultivar treatment with the Sphingomonas sp. K1B strain, a decrease in the plants affection by brown rust was observed by 13 %, the pustules number decreased by 59 %, the pustule area by 52 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1448

e6
“On the soft wheat cultivar Sudarynya and triticale cultivars Aist Kharkovskiy and Dua, a decrease in helminthosporiotic root rot was revealed when using associative rhizobacteria; the maximal decrease in the disease development (by 32 %) was noted when using the strain Sphingomonas sp. K1B”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–2040

Title

The optimization of grain crops’ phytosanitary condition with the associative rhizobacteria application

L. E Kolesnikov; A. A Belimov; B. A Hassan; et al. Rossiiskaia selskokhoziaistvennaia nauka 2023. doi:10.31857/s2500262723010088

Other claims from this paper (19)

Regulation of sulfate uptake, expression of the sulfate transporters Sultr1;1 and Sultr1;2, and APS reductase in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) as affected by atmospheric H2S nutrition and sulfate deprivation 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With ample sulfate, H2S partly reduced sulfate uptake capacity.

Taxon: Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: H2S exposuree0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: sulfate uptake capacitye0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: partial decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: ample sulfate supplye0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“At an ample sulfate supply, H2S exposure of Chinese cabbage resulted in a partial decrease of the sulfate uptake capacity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–563

e1
“At an ample sulfate supply, H2S exposure of Chinese cabbage resulted in a partial decrease of the sulfate uptake capacity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–563

e2
“Upon sulfate deprivation there was a more than 3-fold increase in the sulfate uptake capacity of the root”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–783

e3
“Expression of APR was strongly enhanced in the root and shoot of sulfate-deprived plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1282

e4
“a decreased expression of Sultr1;2 in the root and APR in the root and shoot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–676

Title

Regulation of sulfate uptake, expression of the sulfate transporters Sultr1;1 and Sultr1;2, and APS reductase in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) as affected by atmospheric H2S nutrition and sulfate deprivation

Aleksandra Koralewska; C. Elisabeth E. Stuiver; Freek S. Posthumus; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2008. doi:10.1071/fp07283

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect H2S at the stated concentration lowered root Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect H2S lowered APR expression in root and shoot.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation raised root sulfate uptake capacity more than threefold.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation induced root Sultr1;1 expression.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation enhanced root Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation induced shoot Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate enhanced sulfate uptake during deprivation.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate root transporter expression during deprivation.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate altered shoot-to-root partitioning.
Intervention effect Sulfate resupply did not rapidly affect the deprivation changes.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation strongly enhanced root and shoot APR expression.
Intervention effect H2S reduced APR expression in sulfate-deprived plants.
Intervention effect Sulfate resupply reduced APR expression in sulfate-deprived plants.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2S reduced APR expression in sulfate-deprived plants.

Taxon: Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensist0
Treatment: H2S exposuree0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: APRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: sulfate-deprived plantse0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“decreased again upon H2S exposure and sulfate re-supply”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1342

e1
“At an ample sulfate supply, H2S exposure of Chinese cabbage resulted in a partial decrease of the sulfate uptake capacity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–563

e2
“Upon sulfate deprivation there was a more than 3-fold increase in the sulfate uptake capacity of the root”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–783

e3
“Expression of APR was strongly enhanced in the root and shoot of sulfate-deprived plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1282

e4
“a decreased expression of Sultr1;2 in the root and APR in the root and shoot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–676

t0
“Chinese cabbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128

Title

Regulation of sulfate uptake, expression of the sulfate transporters Sultr1;1 and Sultr1;2, and APS reductase in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) as affected by atmospheric H2S nutrition and sulfate deprivation

Aleksandra Koralewska; C. Elisabeth E. Stuiver; Freek S. Posthumus; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2008. doi:10.1071/fp07283

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With ample sulfate, H2S partly reduced sulfate uptake capacity.
Intervention effect H2S at the stated concentration lowered root Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect H2S lowered APR expression in root and shoot.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation raised root sulfate uptake capacity more than threefold.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation induced root Sultr1;1 expression.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation enhanced root Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation induced shoot Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate enhanced sulfate uptake during deprivation.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate root transporter expression during deprivation.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate altered shoot-to-root partitioning.
Intervention effect Sulfate resupply did not rapidly affect the deprivation changes.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation strongly enhanced root and shoot APR expression.
Intervention effect Sulfate resupply reduced APR expression in sulfate-deprived plants.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate deprivation induced root Sultr1;1 expression.

Taxon: Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensist0
Treatment: sulfate deprivatione0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Gene: Sultr1;1e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: expression of Sultr1;1e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: inducede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: ample sulfate supplye0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“an induced expression of Sultr1;1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–833

e1
“At an ample sulfate supply, H2S exposure of Chinese cabbage resulted in a partial decrease of the sulfate uptake capacity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–563

e2
“Upon sulfate deprivation there was a more than 3-fold increase in the sulfate uptake capacity of the root”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–783

e3
“Expression of APR was strongly enhanced in the root and shoot of sulfate-deprived plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1282

e4
“a decreased expression of Sultr1;2 in the root and APR in the root and shoot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–676

t0
“Chinese cabbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128

Title

Regulation of sulfate uptake, expression of the sulfate transporters Sultr1;1 and Sultr1;2, and APS reductase in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) as affected by atmospheric H2S nutrition and sulfate deprivation

Aleksandra Koralewska; C. Elisabeth E. Stuiver; Freek S. Posthumus; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2008. doi:10.1071/fp07283

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With ample sulfate, H2S partly reduced sulfate uptake capacity.
Intervention effect H2S at the stated concentration lowered root Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect H2S lowered APR expression in root and shoot.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation raised root sulfate uptake capacity more than threefold.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation enhanced root Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation induced shoot Sultr1;2 expression.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate enhanced sulfate uptake during deprivation.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate root transporter expression during deprivation.
Intervention effect H2S did not alleviate altered shoot-to-root partitioning.
Intervention effect Sulfate resupply did not rapidly affect the deprivation changes.
Intervention effect Sulfate deprivation strongly enhanced root and shoot APR expression.
Intervention effect H2S reduced APR expression in sulfate-deprived plants.
Intervention effect Sulfate resupply reduced APR expression in sulfate-deprived plants.

Chitosan (biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some ornamental foliage diseases. 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of willow against Melampsora epitea gave 26 to 47% disease severity response under 01-0.04%.

Taxon: willowSalixe0
Treatment: chitosane0
Interactor: Melampsora epiteaMelampsora epiteae0pathogen
Outcome: disease severitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 26 to 47%e0
Qualifier: 01-0.04%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–2664

Title

Chitosan (biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some ornamental foliage diseases.

A T Wojdyła PubMed 2004

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of dieffenbachia against Myrotecium gave about 40% Myrotecium leaf spot response under Curative application.

Taxon: dieffenbachiaDieffenbachiae0
Treatment: chitosane0
Interactor: Myroteciume0pathogen
Outcome: Myrotecium leaf spote0
Direction: controllede0
Value: about 40%e0
Qualifier: Curative applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–2664

Title

Chitosan (biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some ornamental foliage diseases.

A T Wojdyła PubMed 2004

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of rose against Peronospora sparsa gave over 72% Effectiveness of chitosan response under plastic tunnel.

Taxon: rosee0
Treatment: chitosane0
Interactor: Peronospora sparsaPeronospora sparsae0pathogen
Outcome: Effectiveness of chitosane0
Direction: effectivenesse0
Value: over 72%e0
Qualifier: plastic tunnele0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–2664

Title

Chitosan (biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some ornamental foliage diseases.

A T Wojdyła PubMed 2004

Other claims from this paper (15)

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: controle1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 48.0e1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: controle1
Outcome: stover yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.2e1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: RDF (T2)e1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.8e1
Qualifier: Non-adoption of individual factorse1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

“decrease in A”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants 19

Morphogenesis, pigment content, phytohormones and productivity of sweet pepper under the action of gibberellin and tebuconazole 19

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass 15

Ameliorative Effects of Exogenous Potassium Nitrate on Antioxidant Defense System and Mineral Nutrient Uptake in Radish (Raphanus sativusL.) under Salinity Stress 15

The optimization of grain crops’ phytosanitary condition with the associative rhizobacteria application 15

Regulation of sulfate uptake, expression of the sulfate transporters Sultr1;1 and Sultr1;2, and APS reductase in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) as affected by atmospheric H2S nutrition and sulfate deprivation 14

Chitosan (biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some ornamental foliage diseases. 14

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14