View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Temporal Yield Variability under Conventional and Alternative Management Systems 3 Show all 3 → Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No-till corn yield variability was similar to conventional.
yield variability e1 Verbatim
e0 “similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2026 e1 “Compared to the CT system, yield variability was 40% lower in the LI (corn phase), 33% lower in the NT (soybean phase) and similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–2026 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No-till wheat yield variability was similar to conventional.
yield variability e1 Verbatim
e0 “similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2026 e1 “Compared to the CT system, yield variability was 40% lower in the LI (corn phase), 33% lower in the NT (soybean phase) and similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–2026 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield s were similar across management systems.
Verbatim
e0 “Yield s in the soybean phase were similar across the four management systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1648 Other claims from this paper (10) Response of Corn Grain Yield to Spatial and Temporal Variability in Emergence 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between plant spacing variability and emergence variability were not significant for corn yield .
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1719 e1 “did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Variation in within-row spacing did not affect corn yield .
variation in within‐row spacing e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within‐row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn plants adjacent to a late emerging corn plant did not exhibit compensatory growth.
compensatory growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “plants adjacent to a late emerging corn plant did not exhibit compensatory growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1435 Other claims from this paper (7) Maize Temporal Yield Variability under Long‐Term Manure and Fertilizer Application: Fractal Analysis 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate yearly maize yield variability .
Soil fertility amendments e0 year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield e0 did not alleviate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1482 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer did not elicit a yield response where manure was applied.
fertilizer application e0 where manure had been applied e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “no response to fertilizer application was observed where manure had been applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1123 e1 “Grain yield increased with increasing N application rate without manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1037 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fractal dimension did not significantly differ between manure or fertilizer treatments.
no significant difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant difference between D values for manure or fertilizer treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1370 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5) Response of Corn Grain Yield to Spatial and Temporal Variability in Emergence 3 Show all 3 → Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between emergence and spacing variability was not significant.
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1718 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Within-row spacing variation did not affect corn yield .
variation in within-row spacing e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within-row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1655 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn beside a late-emerging plant showed no compensatory growth.
compensatory growth e0 did not exhibit e0 Verbatim
e0 “plants adjacent to a late emerging corn plant did not exhibit compensatory growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1434 Other claims from this paper (6) Effects of soil properties on variation in growth, grain yield and nutrient concentration of wheat and barley 2 Show all 2 → Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In a year with above-average rainfall, measured soil variables described very little of the yield variation.
dryland cereal crops e2 variation in yield e1 In a year with above-average rainfall e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “In a year with above-average rainfall, very little of the variation in yield could be described by any of the measured soil variables ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1907 e2 “High spatial and temporal variability is an inherent feature of dryland cereal crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Colwell phosphorus in the topsoil was not related to dry matter production at anthesis or to grain yield .
dryland cereal crops e3 Colwell phosphorus e1 dry matter production at anthesis or with grain yield e2 topsoil (0–0.15 m) e1 Verbatim
e1 “Colwell phosphorus concentration in the topsoil (0–0.15 m) was positively correlated with dry matter production at tillering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1438 e2 “but was not related to dry matter production at anthesis or with grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1515 e3 “High spatial and temporal variability is an inherent feature of dryland cereal crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Spatio‐temporal variability in vine vigour and yield in a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc vineyard 2 Show all 2 → Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield variation was unrelated to vine vigour.
variation in vine vigour e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “patterns of yield variation are neither temporal ly stable nor related to variation in vine vigour ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–985 t0 “Sauvignon Blanc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield variation was unrelated to inherent block characteristics.
underlying characteristics of the block e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “patterns of yield variation are neither temporal ly stable nor related to variation in vine vigour or the inherent underlying characteristics of the block ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1041 t0 “Sauvignon Blanc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (7) SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN APPLES 1 Show all 1 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold storage did not change soluble solids content in Fuji.
soluble solids content e0 did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “APPLES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 e0 “During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 Other claims from this paper (9) Spatial and Temporal Variability of Available Nutrient in Cotton Field at Flower and Boll Stage and Its Effect on Lint Yield and Fiber Quality 1 Show all 1 → Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under N0, soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and phosphorus had no significant horizontal variation.
alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available phosphorus contents e0 no significant variation e0 Verbatim
e0 “in N0 treatment,there was no significant variation in alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available phosphorus contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1569 t0 “Cotton Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Spatial-temporal variability of leaf chlorophyll and its relationship with cocoa yield 1 Show all 1 → Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under the conditions of the study, no relationship could be established between leaf chlorophyll index and cocoa yield .
no_change inferred e1 Verbatim
e1 “Under the conditions of this study, it was not possible to establish a relationship between leaf chlorophyll index and cocoa yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1130 Other claims from this paper (3) Crop resilience to climate change: A study of spatio-temporal variability of sugarcane yield in a subtropical region, China 1 Show all 1 → Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane yield had no significant relationship with solar radiation changes.
changes in solar radiation e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “sugarcane yield had no significant relationship with changes in solar radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1831 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation Projected sugarcane dry-matter yield increases under RCP4.5 were 3.6, 4.7 and 5.8 t ha−1 for the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s against baseline. Observation Projected sugarcane dry-matter yield increases under RCP8.5 were 2.9, 5.4 and 8.5 t ha−1 for the 2030s, 2060s and 2090s against baseline. Observation Projected sugarcane sucrose yield increases under RCP4.5 were 5.2, 7.0 and 8.3 t ha−1 across the future periods. Observation Projected sugarcane sucrose yield increases under RCP8.5 were 4.3, 7.2 and 10.8 t ha−1 across the future periods. Association Sugarcane yield was significantly correlated with rainfall changes. Association Sugarcane yield was significantly correlated with temperature changes. Association Combined radiation, rainfall, temperature and elevated CO2 changes may explain 69% of sugarcane DM yield changes. Association Combined radiation, rainfall, temperature and elevated CO2 changes may explain 76% of sugarcane sucrose yield changes. Association Increased temperature caused a small increase in sugarcane yield. Association Increased rainfall significantly increased sugarcane yield until a limit was exceeded. Association Sugarcane yield decreased when rainfall exceeded a certain limit. Association Sucrose yield increased with temperature at constant radiation. Association Sucrose yield decreased when radiation exceeded a certain limit. Association Temperature changes increased sucrose yield only when radiation and temperature increased together. Association Rainfall increased sucrose yield, though the amplitude was limited. Association Radiation increased sucrose yield, though the amplitude was limited. Recommendation The authors recommend supplemental irrigation to improve sugarcane yield under future climate change. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Zea mays
Gossypium hirsutum
Theobroma cacao