View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photoinhibitory treatment beyond 2 h did not further decrease photosynthesis in soybean.
Treatmentphotoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h e2 Directiondid not cause a further decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Exposure to the photoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h did not cause a further decrease of photosynthesis in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–823 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential did not decline under low photon flux density.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ψl in the plant exposed to low PFD did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–608 t0 “Responses of Soybean Leaf Angle, Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance to Leaf and Soil Water Potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease caused by waterlogging was compensated to a level similar to Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 through enhanced nodule growth in the recovery stage.
Qualifierbecause of its enhanced nodule growth during the recovery stage e3 ComparatorEnrei and Shinpaldalkong2 e3 Verbatim
t0 “supernodulating soybean cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–109 e2 “Kanto100 and SS2-2 exhibits a marked decrease in dry matter production by waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1841 e3 “yield decrease is compensated to level similar to that of Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 because of its enhanced nodule growth during the recovery stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1994 Other claims from this paper (8)
not stated 6 Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
EDTA washing did not further decrease chloroplast chloride.
Treatmentwashing in EDTA e0 Outcomechloroplast Cl(-) e0 Directionnot decreased further e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “chloroplast Cl(-) was not decrease d further by washing in EDTA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1297 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Ambient-CO₂ leaf photosynthesis did not differ among genotypes.
OutcomeLeaf photosynthesis e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf photosynthesis at ambient [CO₂] was not different among the genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–550 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Free cordon vines had no assimilation decrease after 27% leaf removal.
Treatment27 % of its total leaf area had been removed e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The FC vine showed no decrease in TVA after 27 % of its total leaf area had been removed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–907 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Added 27 mM NaCl did not significantly decrease biomass production or harvest photosynthesis parameters relative to Control_2.
Treatmentaddition of 27 mM NaCl e0 Outcomebiomass production, or in photosynthesis-related parameters at harvest e0 Directiondid not result in any significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to Control_2, the addition of 27 mM NaCl in the nutrient solution did not result in any significant decrease in biomass production, or in photosynthesis -related parameters at harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–2038 t0 “Lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mowing did not decrease vitamin C or anthocyanin contents.
TreatmentMowing treatments e0 OutcomeVitamin C and anthocyanin contents e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mowing treatments promoted photosynthesis , and did not decrease soluble sugar, sucrose, soluble protein, Vitamin C and anthocyanin contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1087 t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–108 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mowing did not decrease soluble sugar, sucrose and soluble protein contents.
TreatmentMowing treatments e0 Outcomesoluble sugar, sucrose, soluble protein e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mowing treatments promoted photosynthesis , and did not decrease soluble sugar, sucrose, soluble protein, Vitamin C and anthocyanin contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1087 t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–108 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under saturating CO2, pod removal did not decrease photosynthesis measured by O2 evolution.
Outcomephotosynthetic rate e0 Qualifierconditions of saturating CO2 e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “such a decrease in the photosynthetic rate was not observed when measured with O2 evolution under conditions of saturating CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–664 t0 “pod-removed bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rubisco specific activity and activation state did not decrease in depodded plants.
Outcomespeci fic activity nor activation state of Rubisco e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “neither the speci fic activity nor activation state of Rubisco decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–857 t0 “pod-removed bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress did not change the F v /F m ratio in bean.
Treatmentdrought stress e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BEAN PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 e5 “drought stress induced an increase in the minimal chlorophyll fluorescence (F 0 ), ac- companied by a decrease in the maximal one (F m ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1198 e6 “The F v /F m ratio practically was not changed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1276 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis during chilling in the light was not prominent for the initial 2 h.
Treatmentchilling in the light e0 OutcomeDecrease in photosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in photosynthesis was not prominent for the initial 2 h of chilling in the light or 12 h of chilling in the dark, but was manifested as an abrupt drop the reafter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–716 e1 “using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Kinetin did not counteract the long-term decrease in carbon fixation.
Outcomedecrease in CO(2) fixation e0 Directionnot counteracted e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in CO(2) fixation was not counteracted by kinetin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1295 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Internal CO2 concentration did not show the metal-induced decrease .
Treatmentmetals in both concentrations e0 Outcomeinternal CO2 concentration e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Verbatim
e0 “On the contrary, metals in both concentrations drastically decrease d (50 and more % of control) the net photosynthetic rate and the stomatal conductance, but not the internal CO2 concentration. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1258 t0 “cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B did not significantly affect net photosynthesis or Fv/Fm in maize grown on sufficient nutrients.
TreatmentUV-B treatments e4 Directiondid not significantly affect e4 Qualifierin plants grown on sufficient nutrients e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “near-isogenic maize lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–119 e4 “The UV-B treatments did not significantly affect P N and Fv/Fm in plants grown on sufficient nutrients, except in the low flavonoid lines dta and hi27 in which P N and Fv/Fm decrease d by ∼15 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1449 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No further decrease in chlorophylls and carotenoids in maize was observed between +60 and +80 atmospheres.
Outcomechlorophylls and carotenoids e4 DirectionNo supplementary decrease e5 Verbatim
e1 “maize seedlings ( ZEA MAYS L. cv. Chambord) were exposed to 5 atmospheres in open-top chambers: non-filtered air (NF, 48 nL L (-1) O (3)) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–415 e2 “NF supplied with 20 (+ 20), 40 (+ 40), 60 (+ 60), and 80 (+ 80) nL L (-1) ozone ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–499 e4 “Across NF, + 20, + 40, and + 60 atmospheres, both chlorophylls and carotenoids were found to be linearly decrease d against increasing AOT40 ( CA. - 50 % in + 60) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1042 e5 “No supplementary decrease was observed between + 60 and + 80 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1104 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize transpiration remained stable at high light irradiance.
Treatmenthigh light irradiance e0 Directionremains stable e0 Verbatim
e0 “Results show that the assimilation rate and stomatal conductance decrease at high light irradiance while transpiration remains stable. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–510 e1 “attached maize (Zea mays ) leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–158 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At low temperature, photosynthesis rate does not exchange.
Outcomephotosynthesis rate e0 Directiondoes not exchange e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An exposure to 4 °C inhibit the plants’ growth, but the photosynthesis rate does not exchange. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–619 e1 “B. juncea var. Nika growth, photosynthesis and water exchange was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–523 t0 “Sarepta mustard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect At low temperature, plants’ growth inhibit. Intervention effect At low temperature, chlorophyll a content increase. Intervention effect At low temperature, chlorophylls a/b ratio increase. Intervention effect At low temperature, carotenoids content remained. Intervention effect At low temperature, size of stomatal aperture remained. Intervention effect At low temperature, F v /F m increased. Intervention effect At low temperature, transpiration rate slowed down. Intervention effect At low temperature, tissue hydration maintenance. Intervention effect At low temperature, WUE increased. Recommendation The authors concluded that Nika is cold resistant and may be grown in northern regions, including for phytoremediation. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At low temperature, carotenoids content remained.
Outcomecarotenoids content e0 Comparatoroptimal temperature conditions e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “The carotenoids content and the size of stomatal aperture remained at the optimal temperature conditions level, and the F v /F m increased, indicating the efficient operation of photosystem II. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–921 e1 “B. juncea var. Nika growth, photosynthesis and water exchange was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–523 t0 “Sarepta mustard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect At low temperature, plants’ growth inhibit. Intervention effect At low temperature, photosynthesis rate does not exchange. Intervention effect At low temperature, chlorophyll a content increase. Intervention effect At low temperature, chlorophylls a/b ratio increase. Intervention effect At low temperature, size of stomatal aperture remained. Intervention effect At low temperature, F v /F m increased. Intervention effect At low temperature, transpiration rate slowed down. Intervention effect At low temperature, tissue hydration maintenance. Intervention effect At low temperature, WUE increased. Recommendation The authors concluded that Nika is cold resistant and may be grown in northern regions, including for phytoremediation. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At low temperature, size of stomatal aperture remained.
Outcomesize of stomatal aperture e0 Comparatoroptimal temperature conditions e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “The carotenoids content and the size of stomatal aperture remained at the optimal temperature conditions level, and the F v /F m increased, indicating the efficient operation of photosystem II. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–921 e1 “B. juncea var. Nika growth, photosynthesis and water exchange was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–523 t0 “Sarepta mustard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect At low temperature, plants’ growth inhibit. Intervention effect At low temperature, photosynthesis rate does not exchange. Intervention effect At low temperature, chlorophyll a content increase. Intervention effect At low temperature, chlorophylls a/b ratio increase. Intervention effect At low temperature, carotenoids content remained. Intervention effect At low temperature, F v /F m increased. Intervention effect At low temperature, transpiration rate slowed down. Intervention effect At low temperature, tissue hydration maintenance. Intervention effect At low temperature, WUE increased. Recommendation The authors concluded that Nika is cold resistant and may be grown in northern regions, including for phytoremediation. Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
C. scoparius carbon gain did not decline during the year.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “carbon gain and water potential did not decrease during the year for C. scoparius ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–714 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
C. scoparius shoot water potential did not decline during the year.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “carbon gain and water potential did not decrease during the year for C. scoparius ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–714 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
C. scoparius carbon gain and water potential did not decline during the year.
Outcomecarbon gain and water potential e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “carbon gain and water potential did not decrease during the year for C. scoparius . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–717 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Phosphite did not increase citrus growth despite greater phosphorus content.
Directiondid not translate into increased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “this did not translate into increased plant growth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1490 t0 “citrus rootstocks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 e2 “the Phi treatment had some phytotoxic symptoms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1546 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Defense gene induction did not differ between mutant and wild type.
Outcomeinduction of genes diagnostic for biotic-stress responses e0 ComparatorXanthomonas citri pv. citrit0 Verbatim
e0 “no difference in the induction of genes diagnostic for biotic-stress responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1484 t0 “Xanthomonas citri pv. citri, the bacteria responsible for citrus canker ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 e1 “leaves infiltrated with the XacPNP deletion mutant show a more pronounced decrease in photosynthetic proteins while no reduction in defense related proteins as compared to the wild-type pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1088 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The XacPNP deletion mutant did not reduce defense proteins relative to wild type.
TreatmentXacPNP deletion mutant e1 Outcomedefense related proteins e0 Comparatorwild-type pathogen e0 Verbatim
e0 “no reduction in defense related proteins as compared to the wild-type pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1088 t0 “Xanthomonas citri pv. citri, the bacteria responsible for citrus canker ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 e1 “leaves infiltrated with the XacPNP deletion mutant show a more pronounced decrease in photosynthetic proteins while no reduction in defense related proteins as compared to the wild-type pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1088 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glands did not reduce herbicide inhibition of cotton photosynthesis .
Materiallysigeneous glands e0 Outcomeinhibition of photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The presence of lysigeneous glands did not increase atrazine tolerance by cotton or decrease the inhibition of photosynthesis by the herbicide. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–414 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.
Organ / stagefourth leave e0 Treatment12 plants m −2 e1 Outcomephotosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content e0 Directionno significant decrease e1 Comparator7.5 plants m −2 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decrease d with increasing plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727 e1 “but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818 t0 “high density cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glands did not increase cotton atrazine tolerance.
Materiallysigeneous glands e0 Outcomeatrazine tolerance e0 Directiondid not increase e0 Verbatim
e0 “The presence of lysigeneous glands did not increase atrazine tolerance by cotton or decrease the inhibition of photosynthesis by the herbicide. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–414 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.