View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between plant spacing variability and emergence variability were not significant for corn yield .
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1719 e1 “did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate yearly maize yield variability .
Soil fertility amendments e0 year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield e0 did not alleviate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1482 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No-till corn yield variability was similar to conventional.
yield variability e1 Verbatim
e0 “similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2026 e1 “Compared to the CT system, yield variability was 40% lower in the LI (corn phase), 33% lower in the NT (soybean phase) and similar in the NT (corn and winter wheat phases) systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–2026 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In a year with above-average rainfall, measured soil variables described very little of the yield variation.
dryland cereal crops e2 variation in yield e1 In a year with above-average rainfall e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “In a year with above-average rainfall, very little of the variation in yield could be described by any of the measured soil variables ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1907 e2 “High spatial and temporal variability is an inherent feature of dryland cereal crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Colwell phosphorus in the topsoil was not related to dry matter production at anthesis or to grain yield .
dryland cereal crops e3 Colwell phosphorus e1 dry matter production at anthesis or with grain yield e2 topsoil (0–0.15 m) e1 Verbatim
e1 “Colwell phosphorus concentration in the topsoil (0–0.15 m) was positively correlated with dry matter production at tillering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1438 e2 “but was not related to dry matter production at anthesis or with grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1515 e3 “High spatial and temporal variability is an inherent feature of dryland cereal crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer did not elicit a yield response where manure was applied.
fertilizer application e0 where manure had been applied e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “no response to fertilizer application was observed where manure had been applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1123 e1 “Grain yield increased with increasing N application rate without manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1037 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fractal dimension did not significantly differ between manure or fertilizer treatments.
no significant difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant difference between D values for manure or fertilizer treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1370 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5)
not stated 2 Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between emergence and spacing variability was not significant.
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1718 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Within-row spacing variation did not affect corn yield .
variation in within-row spacing e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within-row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1655 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield variation was unrelated to vine vigour.
variation in vine vigour e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “patterns of yield variation are neither temporal ly stable nor related to variation in vine vigour ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–985 t0 “Sauvignon Blanc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield variation was unrelated to inherent block characteristics.
underlying characteristics of the block e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “patterns of yield variation are neither temporal ly stable nor related to variation in vine vigour or the inherent underlying characteristics of the block ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1041 t0 “Sauvignon Blanc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield s were similar across management systems.
Verbatim
e0 “Yield s in the soybean phase were similar across the four management systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1648 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
There were no substantial differences in soybean yield prediction performance among the deep learning architectures.
no substantial differences e3 DL architectures e3 Verbatim
e0 “predicting within-field soybean yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–246 e3 “There were no substantial differences in performance among the DL architectures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1186 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold storage did not change soluble solids content in Fuji.
soluble solids content e0 did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “APPLES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 e0 “During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under the conditions of the study, no relationship could be established between leaf chlorophyll index and cocoa yield .
no_change inferred e1 Verbatim
e1 “Under the conditions of this study, it was not possible to establish a relationship between leaf chlorophyll index and cocoa yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1130 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn beside a late-emerging plant showed no compensatory growth.
compensatory growth e0 did not exhibit e0 Verbatim
e0 “plants adjacent to a late emerging corn plant did not exhibit compensatory growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1434 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under N0, soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and phosphorus had no significant horizontal variation.
alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available phosphorus contents e0 no significant variation e0 Verbatim
e0 “in N0 treatment,there was no significant variation in alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available phosphorus contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1569 t0 “Cotton Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
Zea mays
Glycine max
Theobroma cacao
Gossypium hirsutum