View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage tended to decrease total weed density and flixweed density early in wheat growth, but not significantly versus traditional tillage.
flixweed e0 weed total density of weeds and the density of dominant species flixweed e0 traditional tillage e0 Verbatim
e0 “No-tillage had a trend of decreasing the total density of weeds and the density of dominant species flixweed at the early stage of wheat growth,but the difference between traditional tillage and no-tillage was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–452 t0 “wheat field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Applied amendments non-significantly decrease d soil bulk density .
applied treatments e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “After the harvest of wheat 2008-09, non-significant decrease in bulk density was recorded with applied treatments while in filtration rate remained unchanged ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–692 e2 “The treatments employed were: Tube well water (TW) alone; TW + Gypsum @ 50% soil gypsum requirement (TW + G50); TW–Canal water (CW) + G50; TW–CW + farm manure (FM) @ 25 Mg ha-1 (TW-CW + FM) before sowing wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–534 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
HDOM-W did not significantly decrease wheat germination relative to chopped wheat straw.
wheat germination rate e0 not significantly decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “compared to CWS, wheat germination rate was not significantly decrease d in the HDOM- W treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–848 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cacao sap flux density changed by −11% without statistical significance during roof closure.
sap flux densities e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “small nonsignificant changes in cacao (−11%) and Gliricidia (−12%) sap flux densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–596 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing VPD slightly decrease d stomatal conductance without significance.
increasing VPD e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the slight decrease in g s and the slight in crease in C i with in creasing VPD were non-significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–829 t0 “cacao seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing VPD slightly in creased in ternal CO2 without significance.
increasing VPD e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the slight decrease in g s and the slight in crease in C i with in creasing VPD were non-significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–829 t0 “cacao seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density .
Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage e0 fiber linear density e0 did not decrease significantly e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density , while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density .
low fertilization e0 fiber strength and fiber line density e0 no significant reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density , while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
All NK fertilizer as base fertilization e0 did not reduce significantly e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density , while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
nutrient density unit (NDU) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Forage rice total digestible nutrient content did not decrease significantly with in creasing skipper density .
total digestible nutrients content e0 did not decrease e0 increasing larval density e1 Verbatim
e0 “total digestible nutrients content did not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–761 e1 “in creasing larval density on the rice plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–686 e2 “rice skipper Parnara guttata guttata Bremer et Grey larvae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–115 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The relationship between nematode density and decrease in yield components was statistically in significant.
Verbatim
t0 “Response of some rice cultivars to rice white tip nematode ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 e3 “The relationship between nematode density and decreasing in yield component of varieties was statistically in significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–847 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At higher density with nitrogen raised to 30 kg, corn production began to decline, but the decrease was not significant.
nitrogen dosage increased to 30 kg e5 began to decline e5 higher density(more than 4 000 plants per 667 m2) e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “This study adopted the method of split-plot experiment design,researched the directional cultivating conditions,planting density and fertilizer levels for semi-compact corn Pacific 98 and its effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207 e5 “in the higher density (more than 4 000 plants per 667 m2)and nitrogen dosage in creased to 30 kg,the production began to decline,but the decrease was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–806 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
With in oculated corn silage (I CS), silo density was negatively related to ETOH (R2=0.09, P<0.10), a tendency only.
bacterial inoculants e1 decrease inferred e2 Verbatim
e0 “In creasing density (D) of ensiled corn forage by proper harvest dry matter, chop length and silo packing results in decrease d presence of oxygen which enhances bacterial fermentation of corn silage (CS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 e1 “This research measured the effect of CS D and bacterial in oculants (I) on selected fermentation characteristics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–413 e2 “With I CS there were negative relationships between D and pH (R2=0.13, P<0.05), NH3 (R2=0.24, P<0.01), and ETOH (R2=0.09, P<0.10) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1468 Other claims from this paper (12) Association With inoculated corn silage (I CS), silo density was negatively related to pH (R2=0.13, P<0.05). Association With inoculated corn silage (I CS), silo density was negatively related to NH3 (R2=0.24, P<0.01). Association Silo density was positively related to lactic acid (R2=0.35, P<0.001) in corn silage from Midwest USA dairies. Association Silo density was positively related to total volatile fatty acids (R2=0.37, P<0.001) in corn silage from Midwest USA dairies. Association Without inoculants, silo density was negatively related to pH (R2=0.34, P<0.01). Association Without inoculants, silo density was negatively related to NH3 (R2=0.36, P<0.01). Intervention effect Inoculated corn silage had lower pH than non-inoculated silage (4.01 vs. 4.30, P<0.001). Intervention effect Inoculated corn silage had lower NH3 than non-inoculated silage (0.93 vs. 1.05, P<0.01). Intervention effect Inoculated corn silage had lower ETOH than non-inoculated silage (0.47 vs. 0.56, P<0.01). Intervention effect Inoculated corn silage had higher VFA than non-inoculated silage (6.59 vs 4.94, P<0.01). Intervention effect Inoculated corn silage had higher lactic acid than non-inoculated silage (4.52 vs. 3.42, P<0.01). Association Increased silo density and bacterial inoculation were strongly correlated with improved fermentation characteristics.
not stated 2 Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
soil inoculum density e0 not a significant decrease e0 1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density nonsignificantly reduced grain rows and 100 grain weight.
increasing density e0 number of rows and weight of 100 grains e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease , but not significantly, with in creasing density , the number of rows and weight of 100 grains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–760 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated mechanical removal of Rumex obtusifolius did not significantly decrease its density after three seasons.
removed eight times during three vegetation seasons e1 No significant decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rumex obtusifolius
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 e1 “Plants of R. obtusifolius were removed eight times during three vegetation seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–719 e2 “No significant decrease in the density of R. obtusifolius was recorded after three vegetation seasons and density was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–889 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Density of Rumex obtusifolius was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment.
fertilizer treatment e2 not significantly affected e2 Verbatim
t0 “Rumex obtusifolius
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 e0 “using the following fertilizer treatments: control, P, N, NP and NPK ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–635 e2 “No significant decrease in the density of R. obtusifolius was recorded after three vegetation seasons and density was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–889 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Declines in grain damage with panicle size were not significant in resistant genotypes IS 17610 and IS 17645.
IS 17610 and IS 17645 e0 Calocoris angustatus t0 pest Verbatim
e0 “the in crease in bug numbers or decrease in grain damage was not significant in head bug resistant genotypes, IS 17610 and IS 17645 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–695 t0 “sorghum to head bug, Calocoris angustatus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Changes in bug numbers with panicle size were not significant in resistant genotypes IS 17610 and IS 17645.
IS 17610 and IS 17645 e0 Calocoris angustatus t0 pest Verbatim
e0 “the in crease in bug numbers or decrease in grain damage was not significant in head bug resistant genotypes, IS 17610 and IS 17645 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–695 t0 “sorghum to head bug, Calocoris angustatus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing bulk density reduced root length and surface area in barley nonsignificantly.
root length and root surface area e0 Verbatim
e0 “as the bulk density in creased, root length and root surface area decrease (statistically significant in common vetch and nonsignificant in Italian ryegrass and barley) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–789 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated defoliation did not significantly decrease rhizome bud and shoot density and biomass of Carex brevicuspis over two consecutive years.
rhizome buds e1 repeated defoliation e1 density and biomass of rhizome buds and shoots e1 did not decrease e1 over two consecutive years e1 Dongting Lake wetlands, China e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the wetland sedge Carex brevicuspis C. B. Clarke in the Dongting Lake wetlands, China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–447 e1 “The density and biomass of rhizome buds and shoots did not decrease significantly in response to repeated defoliation over two consecutive years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–593 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Theobroma cacao
Hibiscus cannabinus
Oryza sativa
Parnara guttata
Zea mays subsp. mays
Rumex obtusifolius
Sorghum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare