View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter or leaf area index of maize.
Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) e0 chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI) e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103 e0 “Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease kernels per row, 100-kernel weight or grain yield of maize.
Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) e0 kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103 e0 “Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease ear length, ear diameter or rows per ear of maize.
Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) e0 ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103 e0 “Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 125 mg/kg Cd, root dry weight decrease d by 5.29% with no significant decrease compared with control.
dry weight of root e3 Verbatim
e3 “When the Cd treatment concentration was up to 125 mg kg−1, the dry weight of root and shoots biomass and PN in the plant decrease d by 5.29%, 1.94% and 2.06%, and they had no significant decrease compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–969 t0 “Lonicera japonica Thunb.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 125 mg/kg Cd, PN decrease d by 2.06% with no significant decrease compared with control.
Verbatim
e3 “When the Cd treatment concentration was up to 125 mg kg−1, the dry weight of root and shoots biomass and PN in the plant decrease d by 5.29%, 1.94% and 2.06%, and they had no significant decrease compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–969 t0 “Lonicera japonica Thunb.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 125 mg/kg Cd, shoot biomass decrease d by 1.94% with no significant decrease compared with control.
Verbatim
e3 “When the Cd treatment concentration was up to 125 mg kg−1, the dry weight of root and shoots biomass and PN in the plant decrease d by 5.29%, 1.94% and 2.06%, and they had no significant decrease compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–969 t0 “Lonicera japonica Thunb.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 2 mM Al, citric acid did not significantly decrease dry weight .
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Citric acid increased fresh weight by 8%, had no significant decrease on dry weight , but significantly decrease d chlorophyll content by 16% (Al2 CA5 vs. Al2 CA0) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–897 e1 “At 2 mM Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–581 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Application of azoxystrobin did not significantly decrease soybean disease severity or improve total dry weight .
Application of azoxystrobin e4 disease severity e4 did not significantly e4 or improve total dry weight of the soybean plants e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e4 “Application of azoxystrobin did not significantly decrease disease severity or improve total dry weight of the soybean plants (P > 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–735 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly lower dry matter.
basal 25% defoliation e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not decrease TDM, seed weight /plant and seed yield/ha significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–867 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–103 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treated wastewater showed a nonsignificant dry weight decrease .
treated wastewater e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treated and untreated wastewater showed insignificant decrease in dry weight of barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1138 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Untreated wastewater showed a nonsignificant dry weight decrease .
untreated wastewater e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treated and untreated wastewater showed insignificant decrease in dry weight of barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1138 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
P. vaginatum shoot and root dry weight did not significantly decrease at 72 dS m-1.
shoot and root dry weight e0 did not show significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “P. vaginatum and E. atrovirens did not show significant decrease in shoot and root dry weight at highest salinity levels (72 dS m-1). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
E. atrovirens shoot and root dry weight did not significantly decrease at 72 dS m-1.
E. atrovirens e0 weed E. atrovirens did not show significant decrease in shoot and root dry weight e0 did not show significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “P. vaginatum and E. atrovirens did not show significant decrease in shoot and root dry weight at highest salinity levels (72 dS m-1). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root fresh and dry weight did not significantly decrease after initial salt stress.
fresh and dry weight in root e0 did not significantly reduce e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “fresh and dry weight in root did not significantly reduce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–517 e1 “initial stage of salt stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–449 e2 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Root K+ content fell rapidly after salt stress began. Intervention effect Root Na+ content rose rapidly after salt stress began. Intervention effect At 3 h of salt treatment, 1,292 genes were upregulated against control. Intervention effect At 24 h of salt treatment, 453 genes were upregulated against control. Intervention effect At 72 h of salt treatment, 486 genes were upregulated against control. Intervention effect At 3 h of salt treatment, 939 genes were downregulated against control. Intervention effect At 24 h of salt treatment, 894 genes were downregulated against control. Intervention effect At 72 h of salt treatment, 646 genes were downregulated against control. Observation More genes were differentially expressed at 3 h than at 24 or 72 h. Association Salt response genes were related to kinase and calcium binding, hormone signaling, transcription, metabolism, antioxidants and ion transport. Observation Many salt response genes were activated at 3 h. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding Almix to butachlor did not significantly decrease weed dry weight compared with butachlor alone.
Butachlor and Almix as tank mixture e0 dry weight of weeds e0 did not significantly decrease e0 alone application of butachlor at corresponding dose e0 Verbatim
e0 “Butachlor and Almix as tank mixture did not significantly decrease the dry weight of weeds over the alone application of butachlor at corresponding dose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–738 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 18 ppm zinc treatment gave a non-significant decrease in fresh and dry weight of wheat.
18 ppm zinc concentration e1 fresh and dry weight average e1 Verbatim
e0 “on some morphological and physiological characteristic of wheat plant var Ipa 99 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–385 e1 “18 ppm zinc concentration caused non significant decrease of fresh and dry weight average ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1789 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in wheat.
supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation e0 not significantly decreased e0 control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry weight s of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decrease d by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation did not significantly decrease Alisma dry and fresh weight .
inoculation with the above-mentioned fungus e0 dry and fresh weight e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the same results were found for the dry and fresh weight of the said weed after inoculation with the above-mentioned fungus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1291 e1 “height of Alisma plantago-aquatica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1079 e2 “Curvularia lunata was isolated
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–138 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of Bud 9 and M.9 was not significantly different from that at 500 nematodes per kg soil.
1 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density e3 dry shoot weight e3 not significantly different e3 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density e3 Verbatim
t0 “Pathogenicity of Pratylenchus penetrans to dwarfing apple rootstocks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e3 “Under the 1 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density, the dry shoot weight of Bud 9 and M.9 were not significantly different from the 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density except M.26 which exhibited a 29% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–555 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing salt concentration non significantly affected number of leaves and number of roots.
increasing salt concentration e0 number of leaves and number of roots e0 non significantly affected e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results of this work indicate that increasing salt concentration in the nutrient solution leads to: (a) a decline in the stomata conductance (b) the reduction of leaf chlorophyll content (c) to a decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content (d) the reduction of vegetative shoot growth, diameter of stem and trunk width area (e) significantly decrease in the leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–2262 t0 “Apple (M. pomila ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Lonicera japonica
Glycine max.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Paspalum vaginatum
Oryza sativa
Triticum aestivum
Alisma plantago-aquatica
Curvularia lunata
Malus domestica
Pratylenchus penetrans