View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 18 ppm zinc treatment gave a non-significant decrease in fresh and dry weight of wheat.
Treatment18 ppm zinc concentration e1 Outcomefresh and dry weight average e1 Verbatim
e0 “on some morphological and physiological characteristic of wheat plant var Ipa 99 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–385 e1 “18 ppm zinc concentration caused non significant decrease of fresh and dry weight average ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1789 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight of wheat decrease d during the last week before cutting.
Qualifierduring the last week e2 Verbatim
t0 “The Development of the Grain of Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e2 “Some decrease of dry weight takes place during the last week ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–355 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Under shading, the percentage decrease in leaf and culm area of spring wheat was lower than the percentage decrease in dry weight .
Outcomedecreasing percentages of leaf and culm area e1 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “The decreasing percentages of leaf and culm area, however, were lower compared with those of dry weight s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–976 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Five days after waterlogging, root dry weight , root system activity and SOD activity began to decrease .
TreatmentWaterlogging at early booting stage e1 Outcomethe root dry weight,root system activity and SOD activity e2 Directionbegan to decrease e2 QualifierFive days after treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 e1 “Waterlogging at early booting stage(05 days after treatment) increased a little dry weight (DW) of root system per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–387 e2 “Five days after treatment,the root dry weight ,root system activity and SOD activity began to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–489 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing salinity tended to reduce shoot dry weight .
Treatmentsoil salinity level e0 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The rise in soil salinity level tended to decrease shoot dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 t0 “wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management treatments decrease d weed density and dry weight .
Treatmentall treatments e0 Outcomeweed density and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a substantial decrease in weed density and dry weight across all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1105 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aboveground dry weight fell 4.4% for each 10 cm decrease below 100 cm.
OutcomeAbove-ground dry weight e0 Qualifierfor each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm e0 Verbatim
e0 “Above-ground dry weight was reduced by 4.4% of the mean weight for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1253 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CPZ reduced wheat seedling root dry weight .
Outcomedry weight of root e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “CPZ resulted in the decrease of dry weight of root and upground parts of wheat seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–406 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
root dry - weight decrease d with increasing soil depth.
Verbatim
e0 “The results indicate that the root length and root dry - weight decrease with increase of soil depth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–674 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–36 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of winter wheat decrease d as soil water decrease d.
Treatmentdecrease of soil water e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Effects of soil drought on root growth and physiological characteristics of winter wheat seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 e1 “total root number,total root length,root volume,root dry weight ,root water potential,root relative water content,root water loss velocity,and root activity decrease with decrease of soil water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–338 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.