View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease sugarcane borer density .
TreatmentRelease of 1418 parasites/ha e0 Second interactorLixophaga diatraeae e2 biocontrol_agent Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease host density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–418 e1 “sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 e2 “a tachinid parasite, Lixophaga diatraeae (Townsend) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
Outcomesoil inoculum density e0 Directionnot a significant decrease e0 Comparator1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield.
Treatmenttraining to an espalier shape e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Qualifierwith and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
Treatmenta third year without wheat e0 Outcomeadditional decrease e0 Directionno additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield.
Treatmentsix plants per meter e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Association author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease of BGF along the leaf cannot be explained by a reduction in trichome density .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–537 e7 “the decrease of BGF along this leaf can not be explained by a reduction in trichomes density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1477 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree diameter showed a marginal, non-significant decrease with in creasing planting density .
Treatmentplanting density e3 Comparator500 trees per hectare e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 e1 “Rubber was planted in three high densities, i.e., 600, 700 and 800 trees per hectare, with the presently recommended level of 500 trees per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1277 e3 “Though not statistically significant, there was a marginal decrease in tree diameter with the in crease in planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2004 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated mechanical removal of Rumex obtusifolius did not significantly decrease its density after three seasons.
Treatmentremoved eight times during three vegetation seasons e1 DirectionNo significant decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rumex obtusifolius ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 e1 “Plants of R. obtusifolius were removed eight times during three vegetation seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–719 e2 “No significant decrease in the density of R. obtusifolius was recorded after three vegetation seasons and density was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–889 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
SEC3A puncta density did not decrease after these cells stopped growing.
Outcomedensity of puncta e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Qualifierafter growth termination e0 Verbatim
t0 “Arabidopsis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–15 e0 “The density of puncta does not decrease after growth termination of these cells, but decrease s strongly when exocytosis is in hibited by treatment with brefeldin A. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1098 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High soil bulk density did not decrease Avicennia root growth.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “High BD decrease d root growth of R. stylosa , but not A. marina . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.