View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The most susceptible genotypes lost root and foliage biomass .
Materialmost susceptible genotypes e0 Outcomebiomass loss in root and foliage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Avocado ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 e0 “biomass loss in root and foliage in the most susceptible genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1304 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
P. macrocarpa allocated proportionally more biomass to foliage .
Outcomebiomass in foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “P. macrocarpa and M. altissima in vested proportionally more biomass in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
M. altissima allocated proportionally more biomass to foliage .
Outcomebiomass in foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “P. macrocarpa and M. altissima in vested proportionally more biomass in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
With fertilizer, more foliated branches contributed more than foliage per branch to the foliage biomass in crease.
Directionmore important e0 Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “In creases in the number of foliated branches was more important than in creases in the amount of foliage on a branch when fertilizer was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2276 e1 “in creased tree-level foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1522 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH size correlated positively with flower and reproductive and foliage biomass and diameter in crement.
Outcomeflower biomass,reproductive biomass,foliage biomass and diameter increment e0 Directionpositively correlated e0 Verbatim
e0 “DBH size is positively correlated with flower biomass ,reproductive biomass , foliage biomass and diameter in crement(P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1969 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vestigated factors had a higher impact on tuber biomass than on foliage biomass in radishes.
Treatmentinvestigated factors e5 Outcomebiomass of tuber e5 Comparatorbiomass of foliage e5 Verbatim
e1 “growth of radishes (Raphanus sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–195 e5 “in vestigated factors had higher impact on biomass of tuber than biomass of foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1125 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer prolonged the in crease in foliage biomass .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was evidence of a prolonged in crease in foliage biomass due to N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–694 t0 “Corsican pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Branches and foliage contributed a low proportion of D. vario-striata biomass .
Outcomeproportion of biomass of branch and foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The proportion of biomass of branch and foliage was low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1263 t0 “dendrocalamopsis vario-striata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage held an average 3% of biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “14 % in 3 % in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–938 t0 “Zanthoxylum kellermanii ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Water deficits decrease foliage area biomass and productivity.
TreatmentWater deficits e0 Outcomefoliage area biomass and, therefore, in productivity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Water deficits result in a decrease in foliage area biomass and, therefore, in productivity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1847 t0 “water-stressed plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–354 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.