Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in dry weight”

99 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem plus leaf sheath weight in no-ear wheat did not decrease until maturation.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage: maturation stagee0
Outcome: weight of stem plus leaf sheathe0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“the weight of stem plus leaf sheath did not decrease until the maturation stage in the no-ear wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–691

Title

Effects of Ear Removal on Dry Matter Production and Its Partitioning in Wheat and Barley.

Kano KOIDE; Kuni ISHIHARA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1992. doi:10.1626/jcs.61.651

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Ear removal did not produce a significant difference in total dry weight in wheat and barley through harvest.
Intervention effect Ear removal increased weights of leaf blade, leaf sheath and roots in wheat and barley.
Intervention effect Ear removal increased weights of stem and late tillers in wheat and barley.
Intervention effect Stem plus leaf sheath weight in no-ear barley decreased to the same extent as controls.
Intervention effect The increase in late tillers after ear removal was larger in barley than wheat.
Intervention effect After ear removal, leaf blade and sheath weights increased more in upper wheat leaves.
Intervention effect After ear removal, leaf blade and sheath weight increases were the same across barley leaf positions.
Mechanism In both wheat and barley, increased flag leaf weight after ear removal was mainly due to increased sucrose.
Observation After ear removal, the sucrose increase was larger in wheat than barley.
Observation After ear removal, glucose and fructose increases began earlier and were larger in barley than wheat.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing fertilizer by 25% did not reduce soil nutrient availability or wheat nutrient content, height and dry weight.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: reducing fertilizer application by 25%e0
Outcome: N/P/K content, plant height, and dry weight of wheate0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reducing fertilizer application by 25% did not decrease the available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the soil and N/P/K content, plant height, and dry weight of wheat.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1624

Title

Beneficial bacteria activate nutrients and promote wheat growth under conditions of reduced fertilizer application

Juanjuan Wang; Ruochen Li; Hui Zhang; et al. BMC Microbiology 2020. doi:10.1186/s12866-020-1708-z

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation N9 showed highest nitrogen fixation activity.
Observation P5 released most available phosphorus in liquid medium.
Observation K13 released most available potassium in liquid medium.
Observation P9 produced most IAA in tryptophan medium.
Intervention effect Bacterial combination increased soil nitrogen by 49.46%.
Intervention effect Bacterial combination increased soil phosphorus by 99.51%.
Intervention effect Bacterial combination increased soil potassium by 19.38%.
Intervention effect Bacterial combination increased wheat nitrogen by 97.7%.
Intervention effect Bacterial combination increased wheat phosphorus by 96.4%.
Intervention effect Bacterial combination increased wheat potassium by 42.1%.
Recommendation Authors considered the bacterial combination a biofertilizer candidate.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment: >95% relative humiditye1
Outcome: ash contente0
Direction: neither a decreasee0
Comparator: 50–60%e1

Verbatim

e0
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

e1
“Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277

e2
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

Title

Does transpiration have an essential function in long‐distance ion transport in plants?

W. TANNER; H. BEEVERS Plant Cell & Environment 1990. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01089.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Water loss differed by a factor of two to three across humidity conditions.
Intervention effect High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight.
Intervention effect The upper shoot also showed no decrease in growth or ash content under high humidity.
Mechanism The authors suggest transpiration is not essential for long-distance mineral transport.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fresh/dry weight ratio did not change under NaCl.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: NaCle1
Outcome: fresh/dry weight ratioe0
Direction: changede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the stomatal conductance in cucumbers was reduced, accompanied by a decrease of the fresh/dry weight ratio in the roots. Conversely, neither of those parameters changed in tomatoes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1165

e1
“NaCl 60 mM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–521

Title

Different Strategies to Tolerate Salinity Involving Water Relations

Alberto Martinez-Alonso; Micaela Carvajal; Gloria Barzana The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Plant Sciences—10th Anniversary of Journal Plants 2021. doi:10.3390/iecps2021-12035

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect cucumbers had significantly decreased root hydraulic conductance under NaCl.
Intervention effect tomatoes had significantly decreased root hydraulic conductance under NaCl.
Intervention effect Cucumber stomatal conductance was reduced.
Intervention effect Cucumber root fresh/dry weight ratio decreased.
Intervention effect Tomato stomatal conductance did not change under NaCl.
Mechanism Tomatoes were interpreted as more salt resistant than cucumbers, possibly due to membrane water transporters.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated residue did not alter dry weight, protein or soluble amino acid content.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: ADOR uninoculatede1
Outcome: dry weight, protein and soluble amino acid contente0
Direction: did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37

e0
“but did not alter the dry weight, protein and soluble amino acid content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–874

e1
“The roots germinated in ADOR uninoculated show a decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–673

Title

Oxidative Stress Induced in Sunflower Seedling Roots by Aqueous Dry Olive-Mill Residues

Inmaculada Garrido; Mercedes García-Sánchez; Ilda Casimiro; et al. PLoS ONE 2012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046137

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Uninoculated residue reduced sunflower root meristem size, length, fresh weight and cortex layers.
Intervention effect Residue decreased superoxide generation, extracellular peroxidase activity and protein oxidation.
Intervention effect Residue enhanced SOD activity, lipid peroxidation and proline content.
Intervention effect Fluorescence imaging showed residue-induced superoxide and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in roots.
Mechanism The authors suggest SOD increase and peroxidase decrease may explain increased peroxide and lipid peroxidation.
Intervention effect Ten minutes of residue treatment caused an oxidative burst in control roots.
Intervention effect Fungal inoculation of residue partially restored ROS, morphology and antioxidant activities in roots.
Mechanism The authors conclude residue caused phytotoxic oxidative stress during germination.
Intervention effect Fungal inoculation of residue limited stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato dry weight was unchanged across light-dark cycles.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: varying light–dark cyclese0
Outcome: total dry weighte0
Direction: remained unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Total dry weight showed different behaviors in both species, since in tomato the total dry weight remained unchanged under varying light–dark cycles, whereas in cucumber seedlings there was a clear decrease compared to the control treatment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–754

Title

Physiological Responses of Tomato and Cucumber Seedlings under Different Light–Dark Cycles

Pedro García-Caparrós; Francisco Sabio; Francisco Javier Barbero; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10070945

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Cucumber dry weight decreased relative to control.
Intervention effect T2 yielded best water content in tomato and cucumber.
Observation Nitrogen, P and K content and partitioning had different patterns across cycles.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll b and a+b declined significantly under T1 and T2 versus T0 in both species.
Observation Leaf soluble sugar and proline concentrations were highest under control conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al-gaimi dry weight did not change under mild deficit.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Al-gaimie0
Treatment: Mild water deficite0
Outcome: dry weighte0
Direction: nor changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 and Hab-Ahmar, while Al-gaimi was less affected with neither decrease in root dry weight nor change in dry weight.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–913

t0
“wheat cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87

Title

Effect of water stress on growth and water use efficiency (WUE) of some wheat cultivars (Triticum durum) grown in Saudi Arabia.

Tahar Boutraa; Abdellah Akhkha; Abdulkhaliq A. Al-Shoaibi; et al. Journal of Taibah University for Science 2010. doi:10.1016/s1658-3655(12)60019-3

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 growth.
Intervention effect Mild water deficit affected Hab-Ahmar growth.
Intervention effect Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Hab-Ahmar growth most.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Sindy-2 growth less than Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Sindy- 1 growth less than Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe stress did not affect Al-gaimi growth.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased relative water content in Al-gaimi.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased relative water content in Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Water stress did not change RWC in Sindy-1.
Intervention effect Water stress did not change RWC in Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe deficit decreased WUE in Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Severe deficit decreased WUE in Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe deficit did not affect WUE in Sindy-1.
Intervention effect Severe deficit did not affect WUE in Al- gaimi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in pea.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment: supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiatione0
Outcome: dry weightse0
Direction: not significantly decreasede0
Comparator: control plants that received only solar UV-B radiatione0

Verbatim

e0
“The dry weights of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decreased by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138

Title

Effects of Deletion and Enhancement of Ultraviolet-B (280–315nm) Radiation on Plants Grown at 3000 m Elevation1

Michael R. Becwar; Frank D. Moore; Michael J. Burke Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1982. doi:10.21273/jashs.107.5.771

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect UV-B transmitting films produced shorter wheat than UV-B excluding Mylar.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in potato dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in radish dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in wheat dry weight.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in potato.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in radish.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in wheat.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease pea height.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease wheat height.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in wheat.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiatione0
Outcome: dry weightse0
Direction: not significantly decreasede0
Comparator: control plants that received only solar UV-B radiatione0

Verbatim

e0
“The dry weights of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decreased by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138

Title

Effects of Deletion and Enhancement of Ultraviolet-B (280–315nm) Radiation on Plants Grown at 3000 m Elevation1

Michael R. Becwar; Frank D. Moore; Michael J. Burke Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1982. doi:10.21273/jashs.107.5.771

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect UV-B transmitting films produced shorter wheat than UV-B excluding Mylar.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in potato dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in radish dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in wheat dry weight.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in pea.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in potato.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in radish.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease pea height.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease wheat height.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in potato.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment: supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiatione0
Outcome: dry weightse0
Direction: not significantly decreasede0
Comparator: control plants that received only solar UV-B radiatione0

Verbatim

e0
“The dry weights of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decreased by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138

e1
“potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–147

Title

Effects of Deletion and Enhancement of Ultraviolet-B (280–315nm) Radiation on Plants Grown at 3000 m Elevation1

Michael R. Becwar; Frank D. Moore; Michael J. Burke Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1982. doi:10.21273/jashs.107.5.771

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect UV-B transmitting films produced shorter wheat than UV-B excluding Mylar.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in potato dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in radish dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in wheat dry weight.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in pea.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in radish.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in wheat.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease pea height.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease wheat height.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in dry weight”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics