View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d photosynthesis was associated with reduced shoot dry weight relative to root dry weight.
dry weight of the shoot e0 decrease in photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in photosynthesis was associated with a decrease in dry weight of the shoot compared to the root. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–393 t0 “tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Impaired photosynthetic capacity was suggested to explain part of the flood-associated photosynthesis decrease .
impairment of photosynthetic capacity e0 Verbatim
t0 “trees of a tropical seasonally flooded forest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–104 e0 “part of the decrease in A under flooding was due to impairment of photosynthetic capacity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1259 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Stomatal closure initially accounted for most of the roughly 30 % photosynthesis decrease in salinized beans.
Stomatal closure e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stomatal closure was initially responsible for most of the ∼30 % reduction in photosynthesis of salinized beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–776 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No lower limit for photosynthesis is evident in the absorption spectra; some experiments down to 300 nm showed no decrease in absorption.
lower limit for photosynthesis e5 Verbatim
e1 “The spectrum of a Fuchsia leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–765 e5 “No evidence, however, is to be seen of a lower limit for photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1513 e6 “some experiments down to 300 nm still did not show a decrease of the absorption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1607 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation does not decrease photosynthesis of grapevine leaves, which the authors take as strong adaptability.
appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation e5 couldn't decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Leaves of Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–111 e5 “The grapevine has strong adaptability to UV-B radiation,and appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation couldn't decrease the photosynthesis of grapevine leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1234 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Photosynthetic pigment content in grapevine leaves increased with time under different enhanced UV-B treatments. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll a increased by 5% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll b increased by 2% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, total chlorophyll increased by 4% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, carotenoid increased by 3% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll a increased by 11% relative to control, a significant increase. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll b increased by 9% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, total chlorophyll increased by 10% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, carotenoid increased by 7% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, flavonoid content in grapevine leaves increased by 13% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, flavonoid content in grapevine leaves increased by 9% relative to control. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chronic acid fog suppressed a decrease in net photosynthesis through its nitrogen load.
chronic acid fog exposure e0 net photosynthesis rate e0 suppressed the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chronic acid fog exposure suppressed the decrease in net photosynthesis rate, due to its nitrogen load. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1231 e1 “momi fir (Abies firma Sieb. et Zucc.) trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–134 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low light decrease d black gram yield through lower dry matter production associated with poor photosynthesis .
decrease in yield e0 poor photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in yield under low light was due to a decrease in DMP due to poor photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–519 t0 “BLACK GRAM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–100 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Verbatim
e0 “was similar between genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1426 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 e1 “well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298 e2 “T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298 e3 “The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392 e4 “The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540 e5 “both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and the ir the rmal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At lower light, root cooling did not decrease whole-plant photosynthesis .
A of the whole plant e0 did not cause a decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At lower PPFD, root cooling did not cause a decrease in A of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1294 t0 “Artemisia tridentata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
When light was not limiting, the afternoon decrease in net photosynthesis appeared to be regulated more by non-stomatal factors than by changes in canopy conductance.
afternoon decrease in net photosynthesis e0 regulated more by non-stomatal factors than by changes in canopy conductance e0 Verbatim
t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 e0 “the afternoon decrease in net photosynthesis appeared to be regulated more by non-stomatal factors than by changes in canopy conductance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–884 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum lycopersicum
Fuchsia
Vitis
Abies firma
Vigna mungo
Triticum aestivum
Artemisia tridentata
Malus domestica