View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “fusarium” → Fusarium . Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).
Association author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Splitting N had little effect on fusarium crown rot.
Treatmentsplitting of N e1 Outcomefusarium crown rot e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Verbatim
e0 “Fusarium crown rot of wheat (Triticum aestivum ), caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum and Fusarium culmorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 e1 “splitting of N had little effect on fusarium crown rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1875 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Combinations of antagonists gave no significantly better control of tomato Fusarium wilt than nonpathogenic Fusarium antagonists alone.
TreatmentCombinations of antagonists e5 Directiondid not provide significantly better e5 Comparatornonpathogenic Fusarium antagonists alone e5 Verbatim
e0 “were tested for their efficacy in controlling Fusarium wilt of tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–291 e5 “Combinations of antagonists, including multiple Fusarium isolates, Fusarium with bacteria, and Fusarium with other fungi, also reduced disease, but did not provide significantly better control than the nonpathogenic Fusarium antagonists alone ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1978 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No fumigant controlled soil Fusarium .
Outcomecontrolled Fusarium in soil e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “none controlled Fusarium in soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–662 t0 “raspberry nursery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–46 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium survival was similar in cultivated and natural seed sources.
OutcomeSurvival of Fusarium spp. e0 Comparatornatural sources e0 Verbatim
e0 “Survival of Fusarium spp. in diseased seed was similar from both cultivated and natural sources ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1973 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium species did not affect damaged-kernel incidence.
Outcomeincidence of Fusarium -damaged kernel e0 Verbatim
e0 “The incidence of Fusarium -damaged kernel (FDK, %) was not affected by species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1204 t0 “Brazilian wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–70 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Grafted plants had similar Fusarium resistance regardless of rootstock.
Outcomeresistance to Fusarium e0 Verbatim
e0 “grafted plants presented similar resistance to Fusarium regardless of the rootstock ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1113 t0 “WATERMELON ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Corm size had no significant effect on Fusarium infection.
Outcomelevel of Fusarium infection e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Verbatim
t0 “FUSARIUM RESISTANCE IN GLADIOLUS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 e0 “The corm size had no significant effect on the level of Fusarium infection. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1394 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium inoculation had no significant effect on tomato growth.
TreatmentFusarium inoculatione0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Fusarium inoculation had no significant effect on tomato growth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1194 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No obvious Fusarium infection symptoms were observed on sampled weeds.
OutcomeNo obvious symptom of Fusarium infection e0 Verbatim
e0 “No obvious symptom of Fusarium infection was observed on any of weed sampled. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–514 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
phzC+ isolates alone did not suppress Fusarium wilt.
Directiondid not suppress e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Representative phzC+ isolates of five distinct genotypes did not suppress Fusarium wilt on their own ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1383 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.