Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IP 0% × PD 22 was at par with IP 0% × PD 33, IP 20% × PD 22 and IP 20% × PD 17 for chlorophyll content in GCI.

Taxon
ClitoriaClitoriat0
Treatment
IP 0% × PD 22e2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 22 , and IP 20% × PD 17e2

Verbatim

e2

“However, in SI IP 0% × PD 22 statistically at par ( p ≥0.05) with IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 22 , and IP 20% × PD 17 (for chlorophyll content in GCI); IP 0% × PD 17 and IP 20% × PD 22 (for leaf relative water content in GCII); and IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 33 , and IP 20% × PD 22 (for cell membrane stability index in GCII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1443
t0

“Forage Clitoria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–62

Title

Physiological Changes and Nutritional Value of Forage Clitoria Grown in Arid Agro-Ecosystem as Influenced by Plant Density and Water Deficit

Ahmed Shaaban; Hamdy Mahfouz; Ekram Ali Megawer; et al. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 2023. doi:10.1007/s42729-023-01294-4

Other claims from this paper (17)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IP 0% × PD 22 was at par with IP 0% × PD 33, IP 20% × PD 33 and IP 20% × PD 22 for cell membrane stability index in GCII.

Taxon
ClitoriaClitoriat0
Treatment
IP 0% × PD 22e2
Outcome
cell membrane stability indexe2
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 33 , and IP 20% × PD 22e2

Verbatim

e2

“However, in SI IP 0% × PD 22 statistically at par ( p ≥0.05) with IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 22 , and IP 20% × PD 17 (for chlorophyll content in GCI); IP 0% × PD 17 and IP 20% × PD 22 (for leaf relative water content in GCII); and IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 33 , and IP 20% × PD 22 (for cell membrane stability index in GCII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1443
t0

“Forage Clitoria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–62

Title

Physiological Changes and Nutritional Value of Forage Clitoria Grown in Arid Agro-Ecosystem as Influenced by Plant Density and Water Deficit

Ahmed Shaaban; Hamdy Mahfouz; Ekram Ali Megawer; et al. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 2023. doi:10.1007/s42729-023-01294-4

Other claims from this paper (17)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

iP N-glucosides were not converted back to iP.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Outcome
not converted back to iPe0

Verbatim

e0

“those of iP were not converted back to iP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–950
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–129

Title

Distinct metabolism of N‐glucosides of isopentenyladenine and trans‐zeatin determines cytokinin metabolic spectrum in Arabidopsis

Petr Hošek; Klára Hoyerová; Nagavalli S. Kiran; et al. New Phytologist 2019. doi:10.1111/nph.16310

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IP 0% × PD 22 was at par with IP 0% × PD 17 and IP 20% × PD 22 for leaf relative water content in GCII.

Taxon
ClitoriaClitoriat0
Treatment
IP 0% × PD 22e2
Outcome
leaf relative water contente2
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
IP 0% × PD 17 and IP 20% × PD 22e2

Verbatim

e2

“However, in SI IP 0% × PD 22 statistically at par ( p ≥0.05) with IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 22 , and IP 20% × PD 17 (for chlorophyll content in GCI); IP 0% × PD 17 and IP 20% × PD 22 (for leaf relative water content in GCII); and IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 33 , and IP 20% × PD 22 (for cell membrane stability index in GCII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1443
t0

“Forage Clitoria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–62

Title

Physiological Changes and Nutritional Value of Forage Clitoria Grown in Arid Agro-Ecosystem as Influenced by Plant Density and Water Deficit

Ahmed Shaaban; Hamdy Mahfouz; Ekram Ali Megawer; et al. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 2023. doi:10.1007/s42729-023-01294-4

Other claims from this paper (17)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids with and without the IP trait had comparable performance, so the biotechnology IP trait had no unintended effect on phenotypic characteristics.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
biotechnology IP traite7
Outcome
phenotypic characteristicse7
Direction
comparable performancee7
Comparator
without the IP traitse7

Verbatim

e0

“Wild soybean ( Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44
e7

“Generally, hybrids with and without the IP traits had comparable performance indicating that the biotechnology IP trait did not have unintended effects on phenotypic characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2305

Title

Phenotypic characteristics of interspecific hybrids between wild and cultivated soybean with and without insect-protected biotechnology traits

Duška Stojšin; Bill Duncan; Chen Meng Transgenic Research 2025. doi:10.1007/s11248-025-00443-y

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IP-TOR did not directly affect SnRK1α1 activity in vitro.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
IP-TORe0
Gene
SnRK1α1e0
Outcome
SnRK1α1 activitye0
Direction
does not directly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“IP-TOR does not directly affect SnRK1α1 activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1222
t0

“an Arabidopsis dual-reporter line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–375

Title

Context-dependent coordination of TOR and SnRK1 signaling under carbon and nitrogen perturbations

Hui Liu; Hai Shi; Jorg Schwender; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1862048

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOI33/AtENT8 overexpression did not confer hypersensitivity to iP.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Gene
SOI33/AtENT8e0
Outcome
not to iPe0

Verbatim

e0

“overexpression of SOI33/AtENT8 renders transgenic plants hypersensitive to iPR but not to iP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1489

Title

Arabidopsis SOI33/AtENT8 Gene Encodes a Putative Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter That Is Involved in Cytokinin Transport In Planta

Jiaqiang SUN; Naoya HIROSE; Xingchun WANG; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00104.x

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

iP in leaves did not respond to shade.

Taxon
Emmenopterys henryi Oliv.Emmenopterys henryit0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
Isopentennyladenine (iP) levele0
Direction
immune to shadee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Emmenopterys henryi Oliv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100
e0

“Isopentennyladenine (iP) level was immune to shade in leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–634

Title

Influence of Shade on Plant Hormone Profiling in Rare and Endangered Plant Emmenopterys henryi Oliv. Based on Transcriptomic Analysis

S. Q. He; J. H. Qiu; H. Q. Zhao; et al. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2025. doi:10.1134/s1021443725604057

Other claims from this paper (12)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight did not differ significantly above IP 50%.

Taxon
paprikat0
Treatment
more than IP 50% treatmentse0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of more than IP 50% treatments had no significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–729
t0

“paprika”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–31

Title

Changes in Qualities of Paprika Seedlings Affected by Different Irrigation Point in Raising Seedlings using Rockwool Cube

Baul Ko; Ho Cheol Kim; Yang Gyu Ku; et al. Protected horticulture and Plant Factory 2020. doi:10.12791/ksbec.2020.29.3.245

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOI33/AtENT8 overexpression did not cause hypersensitivity to iP.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise1
Treatment
overexpression of SOI33/AtENT8e0
Gene
SOI33/AtENT8e0
Outcome
iPe0
Direction
not toe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“overexpression of SOI33/AtENT8 renders transgenic plants hyper sensitive to iPR but not to iP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1480
e1

“transport ers in Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–530

Title

Arabidopsis SOI33/AtENT8 Gene Encodes a Putative Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter That Is Involved in Cytokinin Transport In Planta

JiaqiangSUN; NaoyaHIROSE; XingchunWANG; et al. 植物学报:英文版 2005

Other claims from this paper (9)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.