View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infiltration sample length generally did not affect water-content and infiltration correlation.
Treatmentinfiltration sample length e0 Outcomecorrelation between water content and infiltration e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Verbatim
e0 “infiltration sample length did not affect correlation between water content and infiltration . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1458 e1 “Field measurements of grain sorghum fresh weight, cumulative infiltration and soil moisture complemented a theoretical development. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–705 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infiltration at harvest and infiltration of pricked seed gave similar disease incidence.
Treatmentinfiltration at harvest e0 Outcomedisease incidence e0 Comparatorinfiltration of ‘pricked’ seed e0 Verbatim
t0 “potato cultivars to blackleg (Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–154 e0 “infiltration at harvest and infiltration of ‘pricked’ seed gave similar disease incidence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–684 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reforestation showed no effect on soil infiltration .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “no effect on infiltration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2183–2208 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Goose treading did not reduce infiltration capacity.
Outcomeinfiltration capacity e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “but no reduction in infiltration capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1320 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Perennials did not affect water infiltration under no-till.
Outcomesoil water infiltration e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “perennials affected compaction but not soil water infiltration under no-till ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1095 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No deleterious effects of vacuum infiltration were observed.
Outcomedeleterious effects of vacuum infiltration e0 Verbatim
e0 “No deleterious effects of vacuum infiltration were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–582 t0 “Wheat Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The chloride absorption mechanism was not impaired by vacuum infiltration .
Treatmentvacuum infiltration e0 Outcomeabsorption mechanism e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The absorption mechanism is not impaired by vacuum infiltration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–972 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pressure infiltration of putrescine did not affect ethylene production.
Treatmentpressure infiltration e0 Outcomeethylene production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Vacuum or dipping infiltration of putrescine at 1 mM suppressed ethylene production, while pressure infiltration had no effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–457 t0 “kiwifruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Vacuum infiltration of cytokinins did not increase BA response.
TreatmentVacuum infiltration of cytokinins e0 Directiondid not increase e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Vacuum infiltration of cytokinins prior to culture did not increase the BA response ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–896 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Steady infiltration rate was unaffected by treatment during the first two years.
Outcomesteady infiltration rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The steady infiltration rate was not affected by treatment during this period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2025–2102 e1 “lucerne ( Medicago sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–781 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.