View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light levels did not significantly affect nitrogen and magnesium allocation to stems .
nitrogen and magnesium allocation e1 Verbatim
e0 “the light levels affected significantly the nitrogen and magnesium allocation to the roots and leaves, but not to stems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–419 e1 “A perennial forb, Conyza japonica was cultivated under three light levels and the nitrogen and magnesium allocation to the roots, stems and leaves were determined ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–271 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher temperature did not affect dry matter allocation to leaves, stems and petioles in fruit-bearing plants.
increase in temperature e0 dry matter allocation to the leaves, stems and petioles e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In fruit-bearing plants, an increase in temperature had no effect on the dry matter allocation to the leaves, stems and petioles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–903 t0 “cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Grazing did not affect resource allocation to reproductive and vegetative stems per unit length.
Grazing treatment e0 resource allocation to reproductive stems and vegetative stems per unit length e0 did not affect e0 no grazing (control) e1 Verbatim
e0 “Grazing treatment did not affect the resource allocation to reproductive stems and vegetative stems per unit length of reproductive K. humilis individuals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1535 e1 “no grazing (control), light grazing, moderate grazing and heavy grazing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–746 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing ozone did not change soybean biomass allocation among roots, stems , and leaves.
increasing concentrations of O 3 e0 allocation of biomass to roots, stems, and leaves e0 did not influence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 e0 “Exposure to increasing concentrations of O 3 resulted in a linear decline in growth, but did not influence the allocation of biomass to roots, stems , and leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–754 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Biomass allocation to stems , leaves and roots did not differ between vegetative-stage R:FR treatments.
vegetative-stage R : FR treatments e0 biomass allocation to stems, leaves, and roots e0 did not differ e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–74 e0 “biomass allocation to stems , leaves, and roots did not differ between vegetative-stage R : FR treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–782 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen allocation among leaves, stems , buds and roots at harvest did not differ among populations.
leaves, stems, buds and roots e0 nitrogen allocated e0 did not differ e0 Verbatim
e0 “The proportion of dry matter and nitrogen allocated to the different plant components (leaves, stems , buds and roots) at harvest did not differ between the populations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1305 t0 “Sonchus arvensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter allocation among leaves, stems , buds and roots at harvest did not differ among populations.
leaves, stems, buds and roots e0 proportion of dry matter e0 did not differ e0 Verbatim
e0 “The proportion of dry matter and nitrogen allocated to the different plant components (leaves, stems , buds and roots) at harvest did not differ between the populations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1305 t0 “Sonchus arvensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Coastal acclimation occurred without substantial change in stem- to -leaf resource allocation .
resource allocation ratio between stems and leaves e0 without considerable alterations e0 Verbatim
e0 “the acclimatory changes in B. pilosa were achieved without considerable alterations in the resource allocation ratio between stems and leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1004 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application did not significantly affect dry matter allocation to stems and grains.
stems,grains e0 nitrogen application rate e0 the cumulative fraction of dry matter e0 not significantly effected e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves, stems ,grains,which were not significantly effected by nitrogen application rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–645 e1 “Eight winter wheat genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil N differences did not change root, stem or leaf biomass allocation .
differences in available soil N e1 biomass allocation to roots, stems or leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaves in black locust ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1881 e1 “differences in available soil N had no influence on biomass allocation to roots, stems or leaves in black locust ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1881 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Conyza japonica
Cucumis sativus
Glycine max
Chenopodium album.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Sonchus arvensis
Bidens pilosa
Triticum aestivum
Robinia pseudoacacia