View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthesis showed no obvious decrease as temperature rose.
temperature rising e0 net photosynthesis e0 no obvious decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 e0 “no obvious decrease pattern in net photosynthesis appeared along with the temperature rising ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–499 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis did not have a corresponding decrease in transpiration rate.
Sangiovese Grapevine t0 transpiration rate e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sangiovese Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 e0 “A corresponding reduction in the transpiration rate was not observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–747 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis did not decrease through 87 moles per cubic meter NaCl under optimal assay conditions.
NaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaves of cowpea (Vigna unquiculata [L.] Walp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 e1 “No decrease in photosynthesis was obtained for NaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter in the plant growing media ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–624 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis with age was not due to mutual shading.
not due to mutual shading e6 Verbatim
e6 “this decrease was not due to mutual shading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–794 t0 “Plantago lanceolata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Four ryanodine applications at 10-day intervals caused no further decrease in apple leaf photosynthesis than a single application.
Four applications of ryanodine at 10-day intervals e1 no further decrease e1 a single application e1 Verbatim
e1 “Four applications of ryanodine at 10-day intervals caused no further decrease in photosynthesis than was obtained by a single application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–511 t0 “EFFECTS OF RYANIA AND RYANODINE ON THE APPARENT PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF McINTOSH APPLE LEAVES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No lower limit for photosynthesis is evident in the absorption spectra; some experiments down to 300 nm showed no decrease in absorption.
lower limit for photosynthesis e5 Verbatim
e1 “The spectrum of a Fuchsia leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–765 e5 “No evidence, however, is to be seen of a lower limit for photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1513 e6 “some experiments down to 300 nm still did not show a decrease of the absorption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1607 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation does not decrease photosynthesis of grapevine leaves, which the authors take as strong adaptability.
appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation e5 couldn't decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Leaves of Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–111 e5 “The grapevine has strong adaptability to UV-B radiation,and appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation couldn't decrease the photosynthesis of grapevine leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1234 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Photosynthetic pigment content in grapevine leaves increased with time under different enhanced UV-B treatments. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll a increased by 5% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll b increased by 2% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, total chlorophyll increased by 4% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, carotenoid increased by 3% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll a increased by 11% relative to control, a significant increase. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll b increased by 9% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, total chlorophyll increased by 10% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, carotenoid increased by 7% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, flavonoid content in grapevine leaves increased by 13% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, flavonoid content in grapevine leaves increased by 9% relative to control. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At lower light, root cooling did not decrease whole-plant photosynthesis .
A of the whole plant e0 did not cause a decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At lower PPFD, root cooling did not cause a decrease in A of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1294 t0 “Artemisia tridentata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photoinhibitory treatment beyond 2 h did not further decrease photosynthesis in soybean.
photoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h e2 did not cause a further decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Exposure to the photoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h did not cause a further decrease of photosynthesis in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–823 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional UV irradiation did not decrease the rate of photosynthesis relative to the control variant.
additional UV irradiation e0 rate of photosynthesis e7 did not decrease e7 control variant e1 Verbatim
t0 “Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–147 e0 “the effect of additional UV irradiation of various ranges in addition to the main one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–244 e1 “compared with the control variant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–482 e7 “while the rate of photosynthesis did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–646 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativat0
Vigna unguiculata
Plantago lanceolata
Fuchsia
Vitis
Artemisia tridentata
Glycine max
Stevia rebaudiana