View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Eggplant yield did not show a significant linear response to increasing sethoxydim levels.
increasing levels of sethoxydim e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Regression analysis did not reveal a significant linear response of eggplant yield to increasing levels of sethoxydim. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–521 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Average cumulative yield at 130 DAT was 4,296 kg·ha -1 under living mulch versus 2,079 kg·ha -1 conventionally. Observation Mite infestation was more pronounced in conventional plots and explained the higher living mulch yield. Intervention effect At 159 DAT, conventional bare ground yielded 5,362 kg·ha -1 versus 4,521 kg·ha -1 under mechanical suppression. Intervention effect At 159 DAT, chemical suppression yielded 4,155 kg·ha -1 versus 5,362 kg·ha -1 conventionally. Intervention effect At 159 DAT, untreated living mulch yielded 2,535 kg·ha -1 versus 5,362 kg·ha -1 conventionally. Intervention effect Conventional and suppressed living mulch yields were not significantly different. Intervention effect Unmanaged living mulch significantly reduced yield relative to conventional treatment. Intervention effect Unmanaged living mulch significantly reduced yield relative to suppressed living mulch. Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Some variables showed no statistical linear response to the percentage of Betty in the blend.
statistical linear response e7 Some variables e7 Verbatim
t0 “Blending Hard White Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e7 “Some variables did not exhibit a statistical linear response to the percentage of Betty ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1268 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity, irrigation method and frequency, and row spacing did not alter the linear yield response when other factors were nonlimiting.
linear response of seed cotton or dry matter yields to water e0 did not affect e0 when factors other than water availability were not limiting e0 Verbatim
e0 “Water salinity, irrigation method and frequency, and intrarow spacing did not affect the linear response of seed cotton or dry matter yield s to water when factors other than water availability were not limiting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1935 e1 “cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–227 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield response to eCO2 in wheat was independent of fumigation technique and rooting environment.
no_change inferred e5 independent of fumigation technique and rooting environment e5 Verbatim
e5 “Yield response to eCO2 was independent of fumigation technique and rooting environment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1063 t0 “Effects of Elevated CO2 on Wheat Yield : Non- Linear Response and Relation to Site Productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Climate yield response s were the same in both tillage systems.
linear yield response to the climate variables e0 either tillage system e0 Verbatim
e0 “The linear yield response to the climate variables was the same in either tillage system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–710 e1 “maize/sorghum yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–224 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not differ at seeding densities of 5, 6 and 7 seed per linear foot in 2001–2004.
seeding density treatments of 5, 6, and 7 seed per linear foot e0 No differences e0 among seeding density treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “No differences in yield or spotted wilt severity were noted among seeding density treatments of 5, 6, and 7 seed per linear foot in 2001‐2004 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1066 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Single-date linear regression found no SCN effect on soybean yield (R2 < 0.2).
Verbatim
e0 “Linear regression analysis showed that SCN had no effect (R2 < 0.2) on yield and green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI) derived from aerial imagery on a single date. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–766 t0 “Soybean Cyst Nematode (Heterodera glycines ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–83 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall pH had no significant linear or quadratic effect on grain yield of either corn cultivar.
Pioneer 3377 and B73✕Mol7 e1 no_change inferred e2 Verbatim
e1 “Two corn cultivars (Pioneer 3377 and B73✕Mol7) were protected from ambient rain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–450 e2 “Analysis of the effect of rainfall pH on grain yield showed no significant linear or quadratic trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–684 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Amsoy 71 showed no significant linear response to simulated acid rain in plants per hectare, mass per seed or seed protein concentration.
simulated acid rain e6 plants/ha, mass/seed, and protein concentration of the seed e6 no_change inferred e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “For Amsoy 71 there were no significant linear contrasts for the effect of simulated acid rain on plants/ha, mass/seed, and protein concentration of the seed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1185 t0 “Effects of simulated acid rain on growth parameters and yield components of two soybean cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Simulated acid rain had small but significant effects in some years on some soybean growth and yield parameters. Intervention effect Increasing acidity of the simulated rain reduced seeds per plant, seeds per pod and chaff dry weight of Amsoy 71 in one of three years. Intervention effect Amsoy 71 plants under the more acidic simulated rain treatments were shorter. Intervention effect Amsoy 71 plants under the more acidic simulated rain treatments had lower lodging in the second and third years. Intervention effect Williams 82 showed a small but significant increase in seed oil with decreasing pH in 1984 only. Intervention effect Williams 82 showed no significant linear response to simulated acid rain in plants/hectare, plant height, lodging score. Intervention effect Williams 82 showed no significant linear response to simulated acid rain in chaff dry weight, low pods, pods/plant. Intervention effect Williams 82 showed no significant linear response to simulated acid rain in seeds/plant, seeds/pod, or mass/seed. Intervention effect Changes in either soybean cultivar were generally 6% or less over the entire pH range studied. Intervention effect The response of soybean to simulated acid rain was not consistent between cultivars or from year to year. Intervention effect The response of soybean to stimulated acid rain was small compared with the potential effects of other stresses such as drought, ozone, disease, insects and weeds. Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photochemical quenching, maximum quantum yield and light- response -curve shape changed little or not at night.
photochemical quenching qP , maximum quantum yield of linear electron transport ( Φ ), and shape of LRC ( θ ) e0 little or no change e0 Verbatim
e0 “little or no change in photochemical quenching qP , maximum quantum yield of linear electron transport ( Φ ), and shape of LRC ( θ ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1002 e1 “Pulmonaria vallarsae subsp. apennina
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–325 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum melongenae0
Triticum aestivum
Gossypium hirsutum
Sorghum
Zea mays
Arachis hypogaea
Glycine max
Zea mays subsp. mays
Pulmonaria vallarsae