View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Primer-dimer formation was not a factor in repeatability .
primer-dimer formation e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The propensity for primer-dimer formation was not a factor in repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1258 t0 “wheat and barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–625 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Primer-dimer formation was not a factor in repeatability .
Verbatim
e0 “The propensity for primer-dimer formation was not a factor in repeatability . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1258 e1 “for wheat and barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–625 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The calculation method used had no significant influence on the estimate of the repeatability coefficient in ornamental pepper.
estimate of the repeatability coefficient e1 no significant influence e1 Verbatim
t0 “ornamental pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 e1 “There was no significant influence of the calculation method used over the estimate of the repeatability coefficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–742 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability for stalk number and diameter was about equal between plant crops and first ratoon crops.
first ratoon crops e3 Repeatability for stalk number and diameter e3 Verbatim
e1 “among 6 crops of sugarcane ( Saccharum sp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–100 e3 “Repeatability for stalk number and diameter was about equal between plant crops and first ratoon crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–347 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The estimation methods did not differ for repeatability of four fruit and seed traits.
repeatability coefficient e0 Verbatim
e0 “The methods used do not differ as to estimate the repeatability coefficient to the longitudinal diameter characteristics of the fruit, seed equatorial diameter, fruit mass and seed mass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1699 e1 “Euterpe edulis fruit characteristics
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–818 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Methods did not differ in repeatability estimates for fruit longitudinal diameter, seed equatorial diameter, fruit mass and seed mass.
repeatability coefficient e0 Verbatim
e0 “The methods used do not differ as to estimate the repeatability coefficient to the longitudinal diameter characteristics of the fruit, seed equatorial diameter, fruit mass and seed mass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1699 e1 “Euterpe edulis fruit characteristics
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–818 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Micro-painting had similar repeatability to spraying.
Verbatim
e0 “The repeatability of the micro- painting method was similar to that of the spray method. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–763 e1 “Using Amaranthus retroflexus L., Lactuca sativa L., Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop., and Echinochloa crus- galli (L.) Beauv. as indicator plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations is similar for ceramic fiber and asbestos.
repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations e3 Verbatim
e1 “Ceramic fiber was found to be a suitable alternative to asbestos in determining the acid-insoluble lignin content of 59 forages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 e2 “Blank values for ceramic fiber were less than those for asbestos ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–327 e3 “repeatability of duplicate lignin determinations was similar for both filter aids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–414 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Specificity, selectivity and repeatability remained unchanged in multiplex versus singleplex RT-qPCR.
specificity, selectivity, repeatability e0 remained unchanged e0 singleplex RT-qPCR e0 Verbatim
e0 “Method validation showed that mRT-qPCR had lower sensitivity than singleplex RT-qPCR, while specificity, selectivity, repeatability , and reproducibility remained unchanged. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1376 t0 “Hops (Humulus lupulus ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–197 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of entry values between the two locations for early vigor score was not significant.
for early vigor score e1 one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 e1 “the repeatability as measured by both coefficients was high for heading time ( r ≥ 0.73), moderately high for kernel weight and plant height (0.48 ≤ r ≤ 0.57), relatively low for grain yield and kernels per spike (0.18 ≤ r ≤ 0.30), and non‐significant for early vigor score ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–960 e0 “A subset of 600 entries from a world collection was evaluated for six agronomic traits at one site in northern Syria and one in Sicily ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–593 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivumt0
Euterpe edulis
Amaranthus retroflexus
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum