View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Plot yield did not show a significant correlation with treatment.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 e0 “Regarding the plot yield , the treatment did not bring a significant correlation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1303 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The rice yield of the crimson clover 2 + hairy vetch plot was not significantly different from the conventional practice plot .
TreatmentCC 2 + hairy vetch e5 Directionnot significantly different e5 Comparatorconventional practice plot e5 Verbatim
e5 “The rice yield of CC 2 + hairy vetch $5kg\;10a^{-1}$ plot was not significantly different from conventional practice plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2354 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plot s behind maize had no significant border versus inner plot yield difference.
Directionno significant differences e0 Comparatorborder plot or inner plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “When wheat was cultivated behind maize, there were no significant differences in the yield , if the plot was a border plot or inner plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3686–3821 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot did not differ significantly across genotypes.
Outcomebiological yield plot-1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “except biological yield plot -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–596 t0 “Bread Wheat Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Podding index did not correlate significantly with yield per plot .
Organ / stagepodding index e0 t0 Outcomeyield per plot e0 t0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “not significant correlation between podding index and yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–173 t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Whole plot planting and fertilization treatments generally did not differ significantly in corn grain yield .
TreatmentWhole plot treatments e0 Directiondid not differ e0 ComparatorWhole plot treatments e0 Verbatim
t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 e0 “Whole plot treatments generally did not differ significantly in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1345 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Within- plot seed-size variation did not affect total grain yield .
Treatmentvariation in seed size within a plot e0 Outcometotal grain yield per plot e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116 e0 “variation in seed size within a plot had no impact on total grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1542 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Dacia yield did not differ significantly in that plot .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “APRICOT TREE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 e0 “Dacia variety, in the some plot had nesignificanthy differences concerning yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–704 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing plot length from 6.10 to 15.25m did not negate the end-of- plot yield effect.
Treatmentincreasing plot length from 6.10 to 15.25m e0 Outcomeend‐of‐plot effect on yield e0 Directiondid not negate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “increasing plot length from 6.10 to 15.25m and decreasing alley width from 2.45 to 0.90 m did not negate the end‐of‐ plot effect on yield of soybean grown in nonirrigated field plot s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1487 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fall 1983 BA application did not change total yield per plot .
Taxon‘Redchief Strawberry t0 TreatmentBA applied in Fall 1983 e0 Outcometotal yield/plot e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “BA applied in Fall 1983 had no effect on total yield / plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–659 t0 “‘Redchief Strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–56 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.