Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot yield did not show a significant correlation with treatment.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
plot yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43
e0

“Regarding the plot yield, the treatment did not bring a significant correlation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1303

Title

Sustainable Plant Nutrition of Winter Wheat

Ottília Vámos; Tamás Szakál; Dávid Vasas; et al. Széchenyi István University Proceedings of Sustainable Development Research 2024. doi:10.62897/cos2024.2-1.137

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice yield of the crimson clover 2 + hairy vetch plot was not significantly different from the conventional practice plot.

Treatment
CC 2 + hairy vetche5
Outcome
rice yielde5
Direction
not significantly differente5
Comparator
conventional practice plote5

Verbatim

e5

“The rice yield of CC 2 + hairy vetch $5kg\;10a^{-1}$ plot was not significantly different from conventional practice plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2354

Title

Effect of Monoculture and Mixtures of Green Manure Crimson Clover (Trifolium incarnatum) on Rice Growth and Yield in Paddy

Weon-Tai Jeon; Ki-Yeong Seong; Min-Tae Kim; et al. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 2011. doi:10.7745/kjssf.2011.44.5.847

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plots behind maize had no significant border versus inner plot yield difference.

Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
border plot or inner plote0

Verbatim

e0

“When wheat was cultivated behind maize, there were no significant differences in the yield, if the plot was a border plot or inner plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3686–3821

Title

Optimizing the prediction of genotypic values accounting for spatial trend andpopulation structure

Bettina U. Müller University writing server of the University of Hohenheim (Universität Hohenheim) 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield per plot did not differ significantly across genotypes.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
biological yield plot-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“except biological yield plot-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–596
t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–131

Title

Evaluation of Advance Mutant Genotypes and Interrelationship Analysis of Yield and Yield Associated Traits in Bread Wheat Genotypes

Naimatullah Mangi; A. W. Baloch; Saima Mir Arain; et al. Sindh University Research Journal 2016

Other claims from this paper (16)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Podding index did not correlate significantly with yield per plot.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0t0
Organ / stage
podding indexe0t0
Outcome
yield per plote0t0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“not significant correlation between podding index and yield per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–173
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52

Title

Study on podding index and other traits in groundnut (A. hypogaea L.)

D. Roy; R.K. Patel; O.P. Ojha Legume Research - An International Journal 2003

Other claims from this paper (18)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole plot planting and fertilization treatments generally did not differ significantly in corn grain yield.

Treatment
Whole plot treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
Whole plot treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67
e0

“Whole plot treatments generally did not differ significantly in grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1345

Title

Planting Method and Fertilization Timing Effects on Ridge-Till Corn

Keith A. Kohler; Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh; Richard M. Cruse UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) 1999

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within-plot seed-size variation did not affect total grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
variation in seed size within a plote0
Outcome
total grain yield per plote0
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116
e0

“variation in seed size within a plot had no impact on total grain yield per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1542

Title

Effect of variations in seed size and planting depth on emergence, infertile plants, and grain yield of spring wheat

Y. Gan; E. H. Stobbe Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-098

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dacia yield did not differ significantly in that plot.

Taxon
APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Daciae0
Treatment
some plote0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“APRICOT TREE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79
e0

“Dacia variety, in the some plot had nesignificanthy differences concerning yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–704

Title

RESEARCHES REGARDING CUTTING IN GREEN INFLUENCE UPON YIELD AT SOME APRICOT TREE VARIETIES CULTIVATED AT S. D. TIMISOARA

A. Ghiţă Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture 2008. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:846

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plot length from 6.10 to 15.25m did not negate the end-of-plot yield effect.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
increasing plot length from 6.10 to 15.25me0
Outcome
end‐of‐plot effect on yielde0
Direction
did not negatee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing plot length from 6.10 to 15.25m and decreasing alley width from 2.45 to 0.90 m did not negate the end‐of‐plot effect on yield of soybean grown in nonirrigated field plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1487

Title

Response of Nonirrigated Maturity Group V Determinate Soybean to End‐Trimming

Larry G. Heatherly; Jeffrey. M. Tyler Crop Science 1998. doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800010046x

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall 1983 BA application did not change total yield per plot.

Taxon
‘Redchief Strawberryt0
Treatment
BA applied in Fall 1983e0
Outcome
total yield/plote0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“BA applied in Fall 1983 had no effect on total yield/plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–659
t0

“‘Redchief Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–56

Title

Effect of BA on Growth and Yield of ‘Redchief Strawberry

Douglas D. Archbold; John G. Strang HortScience 1986. doi:10.21273/hortsci.21.6.1377

Other claims from this paper (10)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.