View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Starch type did not affect fresh root yield , adjusted fresh root yield or harvest index.
Outcomefresh root yield (FRY), adjusted FRY and harvest index e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no effect of starch type on fresh root yield (FRY), adjusted FRY and harvest index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1262 t0 “Cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh root weight per plant and fresh root yield per ha were positively correlated (0.831).
Outcomefresh root yield per ha e4 Directionincrease inferred e4 Comparatorfresh root weight per plant e4 Verbatim
t0 “ashwagandha (Withania somnifera Dunal) cv. Jawahar-20 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–88 e4 “fresh root weight per plant (g) and fresh root yield per ha (0.831) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–748 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava fresh shoot yield and fresh root yield differed highly significantly among varieties, sites and years.
Outcomefresh shoot yield, and fresh root yield e0 Qualifierdifferences were detectedamong varieties, sites and years e0 Verbatim
e0 “Highly significant differences were detectedamong varieties, sites and years for fresh shoot yield , and fresh root yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–401 t0 “cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry root yield of Ashwagandha were maximum in the T2 treatment.
Outcomefresh root yield and dry root yield e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “root yield of Ashwagandha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 e2 “fresh root yield and dry root yield were recorded maximum in T2 treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–836 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root weight, top fresh weight and root fresh yield were lower in high-temperature conditions.
Treatmenthigh-temperature conditions e5 Outcomeroot weight, top fresh weight, root fresh yield e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–110 e5 “Agronomic traits revealed lower values of root weight, top fresh weight, root fresh yield , top fresh yield , and sucrose% in high-temperature conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1110 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management significantly influenced fresh root yield , fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield .
Treatmentintegrated nutrient management e0 Outcomefresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “All the growth and yield parameters, fresh root yield , fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root and foliage were significantly influenced due to integrated nutrient management ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1483 t0 “fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection on fresh root yield gave an 82% differential.
Outcomefresh root yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “fresh root yield (82%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1759 t0 “Cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh root yield differed among sites and cultivars.
OutcomeFresh root yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Fresh root yield differed between sites and cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1812 t0 “cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Jamon had the lowest fresh root weight per plant and fresh and dry root yield per feddan.
Outcomefresh weight of root/plant, fresh and dry weight of roots/fed e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
t0 “Fodder Beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 e0 “Jamon recorded the lowest fresh weight of root /plant, fresh and dry weight of root s/fed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1523 Other claims from this paper (13) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend exploiting these crosses for high fresh root yield per plant.
Outcomehigh fresh root yield / plant e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “These crosses could be exploited for obtaining high fresh root yield / plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1263 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.