View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil losses were generally greater at field capacity than at 50% field capacity .
Comparator50% field capacity e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Losses were generally greater at field capacity than at 50% field capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–701 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
With increasing transplanter speed, effective field capacity , theoretical field capacity and field efficiency decreased.
Treatmentincreasing speed of the transplanter e3 Outcomeeffective field capacity, theoretical field capacity and field efficiency e3 Verbatim
t0 “two row tomato transplanter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–58 e3 “Results observed that with increasing speed of the transplanter, missing percentage, plant spacing, planting depth, row spacing, length of seedling increased and effective field capacity , theoretical field capacity and field efficiency decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1745 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late in the experiment, 40% field capacity had lower SPAD, POD and SOD than 70% and 100% field capacity .
Treatment40% field capacity e0 OutcomeSPAD value, the activity of POD and SOD e0 Comparator70% field capacity and 100 field capacity e0 Verbatim
e0 “the SPAD value, the activity of POD and SOD in N. incisum at the 40% field capacity were lower than 70% field capacity and 100 field capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1292 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 100% of field capacity was superior to 60% of field capacity for corn.
Treatmentirrigation at 100% field capacity e0 Comparator60% of field capacity e0 Verbatim
t0 “Corn Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–113 e0 “the superiority of irrigation at 100% field capacity in comparison with 60% of field capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1062 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late in the experiment, 40% field capacity had higher rhizome MDA than 70% and 100% field capacity .
Outcomecontent of MDA in rhizome e0 Comparator70% field capacity and 100% field capacity e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the content of MDA in rhizome were higher than 70% field capacity and 100% field capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1389 t0 “Notopterygium incisum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–104 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Valerian under 40% field capacity produced the lowest biomass compared with 60%, 80% and 100% field capacity .
Treatment40% field capacity e0 Comparator60 %, 80 % and 100 % field capacity e0 Verbatim
t0 “Valerian biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–66 e0 “The result depicted that 40% field capacity produced the lowest biomass compared to 60 %, 80 % and 100 % field capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–977 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root development was somewhat suppressed at field capacity and 40% of field capacity .
Treatmentsoil water content at field capacity and at 40% of field capacity e0 Outcomeroot development e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “sweet potato cuttings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–106 e0 “With the soil water content at field capacity and at 40% of field capacity root development was somewhat suppressed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1814 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf free proline content followed the reported field - capacity ranking.
Outcomefree Proline conten of the leaves e0 Qualifierfield capacity 10% field capacity 20% field capacity 80% fieldcapacity 40% field capacity 60% e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the free Proline conten of the leaves was in the order of field capacity 10% field capacity 20% field capacity 80% field capacity 40% field capacity 60% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–801 t0 “Osmanthus fragrans (Thunb.) Lour. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–116 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Notopterol and isoimperatorin were higher at 70% than at 100% and 40% field capacity .
Treatment70% field capacity e0 Outcomenotopterol and isoimperatorin e0 Comparator100 field capacity and 40 field capacity e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the 70% field capacity , the notopterol and isoimperatorinwerehigher than100 field capacity and 40 field capacity . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1591 t0 “Notopterygium incisum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–104 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought at 35% field capacity depressed the listed wheat traits relative to 60% and 85% field capacity .
Treatmentdrought (35% field capacity) e0 Outcomeall traits above e0 Directionnegative effect e0 Comparatorfield capacity (60, 85%) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Exposure of plants to drought (35% field capacity ) showed a negative effect on all traits above comparing to field capacity (60, 85%) except for the increase in antioxidant enzymes (Peroxidase, Catalase). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1105 t0 “wheat cultivars ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–119 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.