View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf emergence to flower stalk emergence averaged 186 days, ranging from 173 to 204.
interval between leaf emergence and flower stalk emergence e0 a range of 173 to 204 e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The interval between leaf emergence and flower stalk emergence averaged 186 days with a range of 173 to 204 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–319 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spathe color development started about 28 days before emergence , when the flower was about 50% of emergence length.
Spathe color development started e3 Verbatim
e0 “Anthurium andraeanum Andre cv . Kaumana flower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–76 e3 “Spathe color development started =28 days before emergence when the flower was =50% of the emergence flower length (4.5 cm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–685 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Female flower buds burst after leaf emergence .
female flower buds bursted after the emergence of leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “female flower buds bursted after the emergence of leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–878 t0 “Populus deltoides
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Flower development in opium poppy has four phases between emergence and first flower .
four phases between emergence and first flower e5 Verbatim
t0 “Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–88 e5 “These results indicate four phases between emergence and first flower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1195 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
T9 reached first flower emergence in 102 days.
days taken for first flower emergence e0 Verbatim
e0 “days taken for first flower emergence (102) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–888 t0 “flower yield of Ixora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High temperature significantly influenced the stage from flower differentiation to flower bud emergence in tomato.
flower differentiation to flower bud emergence e0 high temperature e0 stage during flower differentiation to flower bud emergence e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that high temperature had significantly influence on the stage during flower differentiation to flower bud emergence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–599 e1 “effects of different humidity on tomato growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–203 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
GroundEye L800 and flower -bed emergence did not differ statistically.
flower-bed emergence test e0 did not differ statistically e0 flower-bed emergence test e0 Verbatim
e0 “The GroundEye L800 process and the flower -bed emergence test did not differ statistically ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1037 t0 “Corn seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 Other claims from this paper (2) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Apothecia emergence appeared synchronized with flower development.
flower development e0 S. sclerotiorum apothecia emergencee0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “S. sclerotiorum apothecia emergence was closely synchronized with flower development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1154 t0 “Perennial Pyrethrum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower stalk emergence to flower cut averaged 64 days, ranging from 54 to 74.
interval between flower stalk emergence and flower cut e0 a range of 54 to 74 e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The interval between flower stalk emergence and flower cut averaged 64 days with a range of 54 to 74 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–421 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Before emergence , Anthurium flower development was long and slow.
process before emergence was long and slow e0 Verbatim
e0 “The Anthurium andraeanum `Kaumana' flower growth and development before and after emergence was studied. The process before emergence was long and slow. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Anthurium andraeanum
Populus deltoides
Papaver somniferum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Ixora
Solanum lycopersicum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Tanacetum cinerariifolium
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum