View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Group II of Botrytis cinerea showed more competitive infection than group I on grape leaves.
group II e1 pathogen group I e1 pathogen competitive infection e1 Verbatim
e1 “competitive infection of group II was more on grape, cucumber and paprika leaves, than group I ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–423 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Group II of Botrytis cinerea showed more competitive infection than group I on cucumber leaves.
group II e1 pathogen group I e1 pathogen competitive infection e1 Verbatim
e1 “competitive infection of group II was more on grape, cucumber and paprika leaves, than group I ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–423 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Group II of Botrytis cinerea showed more competitive infection than group I on paprika leaves.
group II e1 pathogen group I e1 pathogen competitive infection e1 Verbatim
e1 “competitive infection of group II was more on grape, cucumber and paprika leaves, than group I ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–423 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Group II contained only Helixanthera .
Verbatim
e0 “Group II and Group II I contain only Helixanthera and Loranthus respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1241 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The 104 SBP-box genes divide into group I and II , and group II further into subgroups II -1 and II -2 by phylogenetic analysis.
divided into group I and II e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “These genes are divided into group I and II , and the latter is further divided into two subgroups (subgroup II -1 and II -2) based on phylogenetic analysis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1148 t0 “land plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–56 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Group I was sister to Group II , and Group II I was sister to Group IV.
Group I was the sister group of Group II, as well as Group III to Group IV e0 Verbatim
e0 “Group I was the sister group of Group II , as well as Group II I to Group IV. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1298 t0 “Anthurium
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Group II had higher mortality than group I.
Verbatim
e0 “Group II differs from group I mainly by a higher mortality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–680 t0 “Malus Taxa and Hybrids
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–48 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nine group II strains differed from the group II core in molecular and host specificity tests.
some differences from the core of group II e0 nine distinct strains e0 Verbatim
e0 “the same nine distinct strains of group II showing some differences from the core of group II (54 strains) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1245 e1 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–92 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Many species in shrub group I were negatively associated with species in group II .
species in Group I e0 association with the species in Group II e0 species in Group II e0 Verbatim
e0 “Many species in Group I had a significantly negative association with the species in Group II ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1266 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
UPGMA Group II contained two landraces.
Verbatim
e0 “Group II contained two ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1159 t0 “cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cucumis sativus_Danser_(14534464724).jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Helixanthera
Anthurium
Malus
Phaseolus vulgaris
Manihot esculenta