View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management significantly influenced rice growth parameters , yield attributes and yield .
Taxonmachine transplanted rice crop e0 Outcomegrowth parameters, yield attributes and yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Weed management practices significantly influenced the growth parameters , yield attributes and yield of machine transplanted rice crop. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–429 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Growth parameters and yield attributes of transplanted rice showed significant improvements.
Outcomegrowth parameters, yield attributes e2 Verbatim
t0 “weed management under transplanted rice condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–60 e2 “significant improvements in growth parameters , yield attributes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1338 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield maximization was attributed to improved growth parameters and yield attributes .
Outcomeyield maximization e0 Qualifierimprovement in growth parameters and yield attributes e0 Verbatim
t0 “Groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 e0 “The yield maximization was due to improvement in growth parameters and yield attributes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–916 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GF-12 had higher growth parameters and yield attributes .
Outcomegrowth parameters, yield attributes e0 Verbatim
e0 “variety GF-12 (V3) noticed higher values of growth parameters , yield attributes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–924 t0 “Fennel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting time significantly influenced growth parameters , yield attributes and yield .
Outcomegrowth parameters, yield attributes and yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the planting time had significant influence on growth parameters , yield attributes and yield of garlic ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–810 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sole redgram cropping increased redgram growth parameters and yield attributes .
Outcomegrowth parameters and yield attributes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sole cropping of redgram increased its growth parameters and yield attributes of redgram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1232 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer management significantly influenced mustard growth parameters , yield attributes and yield .
TreatmentFertilizer management treatments e0 Outcomegrowth parameters, yield attributes and yield e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Rapeseed/toria (Brassica campestris ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 e0 “Fertilizer management treatments significantly influenced various growth parameters , yield attributes and yield of mustard. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1959 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments significantly affected rice growth parameters and yield attributes .
Treatmentdifferent treatments e0 Outcomegrowth parameters and yield attributes e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–75 e0 “all the growth parameters and yield attributes were significantly influenced by different treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–502 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Growth parameters and yield attributes followed the seed- yield trend.
Outcomegrowth parameters and yield attributes e0 Verbatim
e0 “Similar trend was also observed in growth parameters and yield attributes . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1408 t0 “Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly influenced growth parameters and yield attributes .
MaterialBarjahaji (AAA) t0 Outcomegrowth parameters and yield attributes e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the growth parameters and yield attributes were significantly influenced by the treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–537 t0 “Banana (Musa spp.) cv. Barjahaji (AAA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–85 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect T4 was superior for pseudostem height, at 278.68 cm. Intervention effect T4 had the least phyllochron, 7.76. Intervention effect T4 shortened the planting shooting interval to 181.05 days. Intervention effect T4 shortened the shooting-harvest interval to 97.15 days. Intervention effect T4 shortened crop duration to 278.27 days. Intervention effect T5 gave maximum pseudostem girth of 68.30 cm. Intervention effect T5 was most effective for total leaf production, 22.99. Intervention effect T5 was most effective for functional leaf number, 6.97. Intervention effect T5 was most effective for leaf area index, 3.17. Intervention effect T4 was superior for hands per bunch, 8.01. Intervention effect T4 was superior for finger length, 24.06 cm. Intervention effect T4 was superior for finger girth, 11.97 cm. Intervention effect T4 was superior for finger volume, 209.36 cc. Intervention effect T4 was superior for finger weight, 149.97 g. Intervention effect T4 was superior for harvest index, 0.38. Intervention effect T5 had the highest yield, 62.71 t/ha. Intervention effect T5 had the highest bunch weight, 20.36 kg. Intervention effect T5 had the highest fingers per hand, 15.70. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.