View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold shock significantly inhibited pitting incidence, pitting index and decay incidence.
Outcomepitting incidence, pitting index, and decay incidence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “CST significantly inhibited the increase in pitting incidence, pitting index, and decay incidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–479 t0 “sweet cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Petroleum oil significantly increased grapefruit pitting .
Outcomepitting of grapefruit e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shellac wax significantly increased grapefruit pitting .
Outcomepitting of grapefruit e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 30% available soil moisture depletion significantly reduced pitting incidence.
Treatmentirrigation at 30% ASM e0 Outcomepitting incidence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The irrigation at 30% ASM significantly reduced pitting incidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–851 t0 “White Grapefruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–93 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean ELISA optical density differed significantly between plants with and without stem pitting .
Comparatorthose plants with stem-pitting and those without e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “there is a significant difference in mean OD between those plants with stem- pitting and those without ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–655 t0 “Stem Pitting Strains of Citrus Tristeza Virus in Indonesia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased grapefruit pitting .
Treatmentshellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil e0 Outcomepitting of grapefruit e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grapefruit with smaller canopies and severe stem pitting differed significantly from plants with greater growth and milder pitting .
Comparatorgreater vegetative development and mild to moderate stem pitting e0 Verbatim
t0 “grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–90 t1 “Citrus tristeza virus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 e0 “the group of plants with smaller canopy volume and severe stem pitting differed significantly from the group that presented greater vegetative development and mild to moderate stem pitting . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–707 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pitting suppressed bare ground relative to untreated sites.
Taxonperennial forbs and annuals e0 Comparatoruntreated sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “pitting had a significant positive effect on the cover of perennial forbs and annuals, and suppressed bare ground compared with untreated sites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–702 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shellac-based waxes significantly stimulated pitting of tangerine fruit.
Treatmentshellac-based waxes e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Fallglo' Tangerines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 e4 “Waxing with shellac-based waxes also significantly reduced post-packing degreening and stimulated pitting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–939 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium significantly increased pitting across three trials.
Outcomeamount of pitting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Potassium in the three trials was very detrimental, significantly increasing the amount of pitting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–994 e1 “Cox's Orange apple trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–32 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.